European Patent Office

T 1658/12 of 06.04.2017

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2017:T165812.20170406
Date of decision
6 April 2017
Case number
T 1658/12
Petition for review of
-
Application number
05821081.6
IPC class
G07F 9/00
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Distributed to board chairmen (C)
OJ versions
No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
USER-SPECIFIC DISPENSING SYSTEM
Applicant name
Zito, Arthur J., Jr.
Opponent name
-
Board
3.4.03
Headnote
-
Keywords
Inventive step - (yes)
Catchword
In determining what is made available to the public within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC by a prior art patent document, it must be borne in mind that it is the description which chiefly serves to disclose the invention in a manner that it may be carried out, whereas the chief function of the claims is to define the subject-matter for which protection is sought. Where a combination of features is found only in the claims (or only in the claims and a "Summary of the Invention" which merely recites the features of the claims), it must be very carefully considered whether this combination truly corresponds to the technical teaching of the document as it would be understood by a skilled person, or whether it is merely an artefact of the claim drafting process aimed at obtaining maximal scope of protection (see Reasons, point 3.8; also T 312/94, Catchword; T 969/92, Point 3, and in particular, page 4, first paragraph; T 42/92, "Orientierungssatz").

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the Examining Division with the order to grant a patent in the following version:

- claims 1 to 13 of the main request as filed at the oral proceedings before the Board,

- pages 1, 2, 2a and 4 to 18 of the description as filed at the oral proceedings before the Board, and

- drawings: sheets 1 to 7 as published.