European Patent Office

T 2451/13 of 14.01.2016

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2016:T245113.20160114
Date of decision
14 January 2016
Case number
T 2451/13
Petition for review of
-
Application number
07715867.3
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Distributed to board chairmen (C)
OJ versions
No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
SENSORIC IMPRINTING
Applicant name
N.V. Nutricia
Opponent name
NESTEC S.A.
Board
3.3.09
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 53(c)European Patent Convention Art 56Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(3)
Keywords
Review of first-instance decision to admit late-filed ground
Ground for opposition under Article 100(a)/53(c) EPC
Admissibility of new objection under Article 123(2) EPC
Admissibility of late-filed auxiliary request
Admissibility of document filed in response to the statement of grounds of appeal
Public availability of commercial brochure from opponent - standard of proof
Kit of parts - inventive step
Catchword
If the publication date of a document originating from an opponent (or a subsidiary thereof) is in dispute, the opponent must prove that date "up to the hilt". The yardstick for this proof is that of "beyond reasonable doubt" rather than "absolute certainty" (point 3.2).

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.