Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0052/14 11-09-2019
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0052/14 11-09-2019

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2019:T005214.20190911
Date of decision
11 September 2019
Case number
T 0052/14
Petition for review of
-
Application number
10197420.2
IPC class
H04N 7/26
G06T 3/40
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 392.52 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Coding and decoding of multiview videos

Applicant name
Advanced Digital Broadcast S.A.
Opponent name
-
Board
3.5.04
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
Keywords

Admission of amended claims into the proceedings - main and first to fourth auxiliary requests (no)

Inventive step - fifth auxiliary request (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0273/11
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal is against the decision of the examining division refusing European patent application No. 10 197 420.2, published as European patent application EP 2 472 867 A1.

II. The documents cited in the decision under appeal included the following:

D1: Ni Qin et al., "On-Demand Sharing of a High-Resolution Panorama video from Networked Robotic Cameras", Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) held in San Diego, CA, USA, October 29 - November 2, 2007, IEEE, Piscataway (NJ), pages 3113-3118, XP031222254

D2: King-To Ng et al., "Data Compression and Transmission Aspects of Panoramic Videos", IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 15, No. 1, January 2005, IEEE, pages 82-95, DOI:10.1109/TCSVT.2004.839989, XP011124668

D4: WO 01/99430 A2

D5: US 2005/0243920 A1

III. The decision under appeal was based on the grounds that the subject-matter of claim 1 according to the main, first and second auxiliary requests then on file did not involve an inventive step (Article 56 EPC) in view of the following combinations of prior-art documents:

- for the main and first auxiliary requests, when starting from either D1 or D2 in combination with either D4 or D5; and

- for the second auxiliary request, when starting from D2 in combination with either D4 or D5.

IV. With the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant filed six sets of amended claims according to a main request and first to fifth auxiliary requests replacing all the claims underlying the decision under appeal.

The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that a European patent be granted on the basis of the claims of the main request or, in the alternative, the first, second, third, fourth or fifth auxiliary request, all requests filed with the statement of grounds of appeal. As a precaution, the appellant also requested oral proceedings.

V. The appellant was summoned to oral proceedings to be held on 11 September 2019.

In a communication under Article 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA, OJ EPO 2007, 536) annexed to the summons to oral proceedings, the board gave a preliminary opinion which may be summarised as follows:

- the main request and first to fourth auxiliary requests should not be admitted into the proceedings under Article 12(4) RPBA;

- the claims of the fifth auxiliary request, which appeared to be identical to the claims of the main request underlying the decision under appeal, would be admitted into the proceedings; however, their subject-matter did not involve an inventive step in view of the disclosure of document D2.

VI. By letter dated 5 September 2019, the appellant informed the board that it would not be attending the oral proceedings. It did not comment on the board's preliminary opinion.

VII. The board held oral proceedings on 11 September 2019 in the appellant's absence.

The chairman noted before the end of the oral proceedings that the appellant's requests were that the decision under appeal be set aside and that a European patent be granted on the basis of the claims of the main request or, in the alternative, the first, second, third, fourth or fifth auxiliary request, all requests filed with the statement of grounds of appeal.

At the end of the oral proceedings, the chairman announced the board's decision.

VIII. Claim 1 according to the appellant's main request reads as follows:

"Method for coding a multiview video stream (100) comprising a plurality of images (104, 105, 106) corresponding to single views in a fixed time instant, characterized by comprising the steps of:

a) Dividing said images (104, 105, 106) in a plurality of slices;

b) Coding (502, 611) each of said slices;

c) Generating a multiview video stream (100) comprising a plurality of separate images, each of said separate image comprising

i. a set of said coded slices (401),

ii. first information (107a) adapted to define the position of said slices (401) and

iii. second information (107b) adapted to identify at least one image of said multiview video stream (100), said at least one identified image comprising at least one slice (404, 405)."

IX. Claim 1 according to the appellant's first auxiliary request reads as follows:

"Method for coding a multiview video stream (100) comprising a plurality of images (104, 105, 106) corresponding to single views in a fixed time instant, characterized by comprising the steps of:

a) Dividing said images (104, 105, 106) in a plurality of slices;

b) Coding (502, 611) each of said slices;

c) Generating a multiview video stream (100) to be broadcast comprising a plurality of separate images, each of said separate image comprising

i. a set of said coded slices (401),

ii. first information (107a) adapted to define the position of said slices (401) and

iii. second information (107b) adapted to identify at least one image of said multiview video stream (100), said at least one identified image comprising at least one slice (404, 405)."

X. Claim 1 according to the appellant's second auxiliary request reads as follows:

"Method for coding a multiview video stream (100) comprising a plurality of images (104, 105, 106) corresponding to single views in a fixed time instant, characterized by comprising the steps of:

a) Dividing said images (104, 105, 106) in a plurality of slices;

b) Coding (502, 611) each of said slices;

c) Generating a multiview video stream (100) comprising a plurality of separate images, each of said separate image comprising

i. a set of said coded slices (401),

ii. first information (107a) adapted to define the position of said slices (401) and

iii. second information (107b) adapted to identify at least one image of said multiview video stream (100), said at least one identified image comprising at least one slice (404, 405),

wherein said first information (107a) comprises a plurality of identification codes (PID), in particular Packet ID codes, assigned respectively to each of said slices."

XI. Claim 1 according to the appellant's third auxiliary request reads as follows:

"Method for coding a multiview video stream (100) comprising a plurality of images (104, 105, 106) corresponding to single views in a fixed time instant, characterized by comprising the steps of:

a) Dividing said images (104, 105, 106) in a plurality of slices;

b) Coding (502, 611) each of said slices;

c) Generating a multiview video stream (100) comprising a plurality of separate images, each of said separate image comprising

i. a set of said coded slices (401),

ii. first information (107a) adapted to define the position of said slices (401) and

iii. second information (107b) adapted to identify at least one image of said multiview video stream (100), said at least one identified image comprising at least one slice (404, 405),

wherein said multiview video stream includes an initial default view (1101) to be displayed to the user."

XII. Claim 1 according to the appellant's fourth auxiliary request reads as follows:

"Method for coding a multiview video stream (100) comprising a plurality of images (104, 105, 106) corresponding to single views of a scene (1) in a fixed time instant, characterized by comprising the steps of:

a) Dividing each of said images (104, 105, 106) in a plurality of slices;

b) Coding (502, 611) each of said slices;

c) Generating a multiview video stream (100) comprising a plurality of separate video streams (101, 102, 103), each of said separate video streams (101, 102, 103) comprising

i. a set of said coded slices (401),

ii. first information (107a) adapted to define the position of said slices (401) in said images (104, 105, 106) and

iii. second information (107b) adapted to identify at least one video stream (101, 103) of said multiview video stream (100), said at least one identified video stream (101, 103) comprising at least one slice (404, 405) that, in said scene (100), is adjacent to a slice of said set (401)."

XIII. Claim 1 according to the appellant's fifth auxiliary request reads as follows:

"Method for decoding a multiview video stream (100) comprising a plurality of images (104, 105, 106) corresponding to single views of a scene (1) in a fixed time instant, wherein said scene develops over a main horizontal direction (X), wherein said multiview video stream (100) is coded according to a coding method comprising the steps of:

a) Dividing each of said plurality of images (104, 105, 106) in a plurality of slices obtained by sectioning said plurality of images (104, 105, 106) along a transversal direction (Y) that is orthogonal to said main horizontal direction (X);

b) Implementing a 90 degrees rotation (501) of each of said slices (104) and Coding (502, 611) each of said rotated slices (104b);

c) Generating a multiview video stream (100) comprising a plurality of separate video streams (101, 102, 103), each of said separate video streams (101, 102, 103) comprising:

i. a set of said coded slices (401);

ii. first information (107a) adapted to define the position of said slices (401) in said plurality of images (104, 105, 106), wherein said first information (107a) comprises a plurality of identification codes (PID) assigned respectively to each of said slices (601, 602, 610);

iii. second information (107b) adapted to identify at least one video stream (101, 103) of said multiview video stream (100), said at least one identified video stream (101, 103) comprising at least one slice (404, 405) that, in said scene (100), is adjacent to a slice of said set (401); and

iv. a third information representative of said rotation (501) of said slices (104);

and wherein said decoding method comprises the steps of:

d) Receiving said plurality of coded video streams (504, 652, 505);

e) Receiving a command (1103, 1103b) to display a view (801, 1102, 1200) of said scene, said view to be displayed (801, 1102, 1200) comprising slices (805) belonging to at least two of said plurality of images (104, 105);

f) Selecting the slices (805) associated to said view to be displayed (801, 1102, 1200) based on the received command (1103, 1103b) and on said first and second information (107a, 107b);

g) Decoding (802, 902) each of the selected slices (805);

h) checking in said multiview video stream (100) the presence of information indicative that said slices have undergone a 90 degrees rotation (501);

i) in case selected slices have undergone to said 90 degrees rotation (501), applying an opposite rotation (804) to the decoded slices (803) before generating said video image (805);

j) Generating a video image (805, 903, 1203) comprising at least part of the selected slices (805) ordered so as to generate the view to be displayed (801, 1102, 1200)."

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. With the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant filed six sets of claims according to a main request and first to fifth auxiliary requests.

The claims of the fifth auxiliary request are identical to those of the main request underlying the decision under appeal.

Hence, the board took account of these claims in the appeal proceedings (Article 12(4) RPBA).

Admission of amended claims into the appeal proceedings under Article 12(4) RPBA

3. Pursuant to Article 12(4) RPBA, the board has the power to hold inadmissible a request which could have been presented in the first-instance proceedings but was not or which was withdrawn during the first-instance proceedings (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 8th edition 2016, IV.E.4.3.1 in general and IV.E.4.3.3 b) and c) for ex parte appeal proceedings). Since in fact almost every request could have been presented to the department of first instance, the question is whether the situation was such that the present request should have been presented at that stage (see, for instance, decision T 273/11, point 1.1 of the Reasons, with references to further decisions).

3.1 Re the main and first to fourth auxiliary requests

3.1.1 The claims of the fourth auxiliary request are identical to the claims of the application as filed, except for a few minor corrections of claim dependencies in dependent claims 11, 12 and 14.

The claims of the main request are the claims of the application as filed in which a few generalising amendments have been made in the independent claims, in particular the deletion of any reference to a scene and the replacement of "video stream(s)" by "image(s)".

The first auxiliary request differs from the present main request by the additional feature in the independent claims that the multiview video stream is broadcast.

The second auxiliary request differs from the present main request in that the features of dependent claim 7 of the main request have been added into the independent claims, i.e. that said first information (107a) comprises a plurality of identification codes (PID), in particular Packet ID codes, assigned respectively to each of said slices.

The third auxiliary request differs from the present main request in that a feature taken from page 13 (erroneously referred to by the appellant as page 12), lines 31 and 32, of the description of the application as filed, i.e. that said multiview video stream includes an initial default view (1101) to be displayed to the user, has been added into the independent claims.

3.1.2 The set of claims according to the main and first to fourth auxiliary requests are either identical or closely related to the claims of the application as filed but differ extensively from all the sets of claims underlying the decision under appeal. Moreover, whereas all claims underlying the decision under appeal defined either a "method for decoding" or a "decoding apparatus", the sets of claims according to the main and first to fourth auxiliary requests filed with the statement of grounds of appeal also comprise claims for a "method for coding" and for a "coding apparatus".

In reaction to the examining division's first communication under Article 94(3) EPC of 23 April 2012, the appellant no longer pursued the claims of the application as filed. Indeed, with the letters of 8 August 2012, 16 January 2013 and 28 March 2013 and during the oral proceedings before the examining division, the appellant filed amended claims which moved away from the wording of the claims of the application as filed towards the wording used in the claims of the main, first and second auxiliary requests underlying the decision under appeal.

3.1.3 For the above reasons, reverting to the wording and structure of the claims of the application as filed, which were no longer pursued in first-instance proceedings, should not be permitted. If the appellant believed that the invention according to the claims as originally filed was patentably distinguished from the prior art (see page 1, third paragraph, of the statement of grounds of appeal), it should have maintained these claims in the proceedings at first instance to get a reasoned decision on their compliance with the requirements of the EPC.

Accordingly, the board exercised its power under Article 12(4) RPBA in not admitting the main and first to fourth auxiliary requests filed with the statement of grounds of appeal into the appeal proceedings.

Fifth auxiliary request - inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

4. As mentioned under point 2 above, the claims according to the fifth auxiliary request are identical to the claims of the main request underlying the decision under appeal.

5. Closest prior art

5.1 In the reasons for the decision, the examining division apparently considered that prior-art documents D1 and D2 disclosed the same features of claim 1 and that both could be regarded as the closest prior art.

5.2 However, the board is of the view that D2 should be regarded as the closest prior art. Indeed, D1 is less relevant than D2 for the following reasons:

In the method of D1, the panorama video is divided into patches (see figure 1), not into vertical slices. The sole passage of D1 which mentions dividing the panorama video into vertical slices (page 3114, right column) does not refer to a feature of the method of D1 but to that of an earlier disclosure (reference [13] in D1), which happens to be document D2.

6. Disclosure of the closest prior-art document D2

6.1 Document D2 discloses methods for coding, transmitting and decoding a panorama video. The panorama video may be constructed by frame-by-frame stitching of four video streams captured by four cameras (see page 84, left column and right column, second paragraph, and figures 2 and 3). The panorama video is divided into slices (called tiles in D2), for instance six vertical slices (see section II.C on pages 84 and 85). Each slice is encoded and compressed into a video stream, for instance, in accordance with the MPEG-2 standard (see section III on pages 85 to 87). Provided there is sufficient bandwidth, the whole panorama video is transmitted from the encoder to the decoder (see figure 7 and section IV on pages 87 and 88). On the decoder side, the user may select the view of the panorama that they want to display (see section II.C on pages 84 and 85). The decoder then only decodes the vertical slices corresponding to the view selected by the user (see section II.C on pages 84 and 85). The user can change the selected view during playback of the panorama video (see the "virtual walkthrough applications" in section II.C on pages 84 and 85). The walkthrough may be seamless (see section III, first paragraph, on page 85). Pointers embedded into the compressed bitstream allow the decoder to quickly retrieve the position of the vertical slices and individual image frames in the bitstream, thereby allowing a seamless walkthrough (see sections III.A and III.B on pages 85 and 86 and figures 7 and 8).

6.2 Document D2 therefore discloses the following features of the method of claim 1:

Method for decoding a multiview video stream comprising a plurality of images corresponding to single views of a scene in a fixed time instant, wherein said scene develops over a main horizontal direction, wherein said multiview video stream is coded according to a coding method comprising the steps of:

a) Dividing [deleted: each of] said plurality of images in a plurality of slices obtained by sectioning said plurality of images along a transversal direction that is orthogonal to said main horizontal direction; (in D2, the whole panorama video is divided in slices, but not each of the four images used to construct the panorama video)

[deleted: b) Implementing a 90 degrees rotation of each of said slices and Coding each of said rotated slices;] (no mention of a rotation of slices in D2)

c) Generating a multiview video stream comprising a plurality of separate video streams, each of said separate video streams comprising:

i. a set of said coded slices; (a set of one slice per video stream in D2)

ii. first information adapted to define the position of said slices in said plurality of images, wherein said first information comprises a plurality of identification codes (PID) assigned respectively to each of said slices; (it is implicit in D2 that each MPEG-2 video stream has its own PID)

iii. second information adapted to identify at least one video stream of said multiview video stream, said at least one identified video stream comprising at least one slice that, in said scene, is adjacent to a slice of said set; (see pointers in section III.B on page 86 and figures 7 and 8) [deleted: and]

[deleted: iv. a third information representative of said rotation of said slices];

and wherein said decoding method comprises the steps of:

d) Receiving said plurality of coded video streams;

e) Receiving a command to display a view of said scene, said view to be displayed comprising slices belonging to at least two of said plurality of images; (in D2, the view to be displayed corresponds to two out of the six slices of the panorama video (see Streams 1 and 2 in figure 7 and on page 86, left column, first full paragraph); the view thus extends over two of the four images used for constructing the panorama video)

f) Selecting the slices associated to said view to be displayed based on the received command and on said first and second information;

g) Decoding each of the selected slices;

[deleted: h) checking in said multiview video stream the presence of information indicative that said slices have undergone a 90 degrees rotation;]

[deleted: i) in case selected slices have undergone to said 90 degrees rotation, applying an opposite rotation to the decoded slices before generating said video image;]

j) Generating a video image comprising at least part of the selected slices ordered so as to generate the view to be displayed.

6.3 The appellant argued on page 3 of the statement of grounds of appeal that D2 did not disclose that a multiview video stream was generated which comprised a plurality of images each corresponding to a single view. A plurality of channels was necessary in D2 to transmit the whole panorama, which implied a plurality of decoders on the receiving side. In contrast, the single multiview video stream of the invention allowed the use of a single decoder on the receiving side.

6.4 The board does not find the appellant's arguments persuasive for the following reasons:

In D2, the panorama video may be constructed by frame-by-frame stitching of four video streams captured by four cameras (see page 84, left column and right column, second paragraph, and figures 2 and 3). Hence, the panorama video is generated from a plurality of images each corresponding to a single view. The panorama video is then divided into slices, for instance six vertical slices (see section II.C on pages 84 and 85). Each slice is encoded and compressed into a video stream, for instance, in accordance with the MPEG-2 standard (see section III on pages 85 to 87). The video streams are then multiplexed (see figure 7 and page 86, left column). The resulting multiplexed stream is thus the same as the multiview video stream of claim 1.

According to D2, the whole panorama video stream may be broadcast over a few cable TV channels or over a LAN (section IV on pages 87 and 88). Hence, it is possible to use a single decoder or several decoders to decode that stream.

7. Distinguishing feature(s)

7.1 The decoding method of claim 1 thus differs from the closest prior art by the following distinguishing feature(s):

h) checking in said multiview video stream the presence of information indicative that said slices have undergone a 90 degrees rotation; and

i) in case selected slices have undergone said 90 degrees rotation, applying an opposite rotation to the decoded slices before generating said video image.

7.2 The further difference in claim 1 that the slices being divided from each of a plurality of images comprised in the panorama video, instead of directly from the panorama video as a whole as in D2, is a feature of the coding method, not the decoding method as presently claimed.

8. Technical effect and objective technical problem

8.1 The appellant submitted on page 8 of the statement of grounds of appeal that these distinguishing features relating to the rotation of each single slice resulted in "an improved coding/decoding efficiency, especially when an MPEG technique is used to code/decode single images/slices".

8.2 The examining division regarded the objective technical problem solved by these distinguishing features to be how to efficiently encode the slices (see point 3.2 of the Reasons for the decision).

8.3 The board notes that according to the description of the application as filed, the advantage of rotating the vertical slices by 90 degrees is that it then becomes possible to take advantage of the particular features of MPEG that provide for individual coding/decoding of horizontal slices (see page 3, lines 4 to 8, and page 9, lines 9 to 12).

The stated advantage of the rotation of the vertical slices thus only exists if coding/decoding is performed in accordance with the MPEG standard. Claim 1, however, does not mention MPEG. Without MPEG, there is no advantage or technical effect achieved by the rotation of the vertical slices. At least none is disclosed in the application as filed. If anything, the rotation of the slices would be disadvantageous because of the additional processing step at both the coding and decoding stages, with no advantage in return.

9. Obviousness

9.1 According to the established case law of the boards of appeal, foreseeable disadvantageous modifications of the closest prior art which are not compensated by an unexpected technical advantage cannot contribute to the presence of an inventive step, irrespective of whether the skilled person would have wanted to make these modifications (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office, 8th edition 2016, section I.D.9.18.1). As found above (point 8.3), the distinguishing features of claim 1 are foreseeable disadvantageous modifications of the closest prior art not compensated by any technical advantage.

9.2 Hence, the method of claim 1 does not involve an inventive step in view of D2.

10. Conclusion on the fifth auxiliary request

Since claim 1 does not meet the requirements of Article 56 EPC, the appellant's fifth auxiliary request is not allowable.

11. Conclusion

Since the appellant's main and first to fourth auxiliary requests are not admitted into the appeal proceedings and the appellant's fifth auxiliary request is not allowable, the appeal must be dismissed.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility