T 2214/15 of 21.07.2020
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T221415.20200721
- Date of decision
- 21 July 2020
- Case number
- T 2214/15
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 09729412.8
- IPC class
- G08B 25/04G01R 11/00G01R 21/00
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Distributed to board chairmen (C)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Device State Detecting Device, Device State Detecting Method, Device State Detecting Server, Device State Detecting System, Liver Abnormality Detecting Device, Liver Abnormality Detecting System, Liver Abnormality Detecting Method, and Device State Database Maintaining Server
- Applicant name
- Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.5.02
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 84 (2007)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(2) (2020)
- Keywords
- Lack of support - main, first and second auxiliary request - (no)
Admissibility of auxiliary requests - second auxiliary request (yes) - third auxiliary request (no) - Catchword
- If amendments intended to overcome objections of lack of support and lack of clarity raised in the summons give rise to further objections concerning clarity or added subject-matter, pointing out these further objections does not represent exceptional circumstances within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, but rather an ordinary development of the discussion which does not go beyond the framework of the initial objection. See reasons 5.3 and 5.4.
- Cited cases
- -
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.