Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • Core activities
          • Stories and insights
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2024
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Executive summary
          • Driver 1 – People
          • Driver 2 – Technologies
          • Driver 3 – High-quality, timely products and services
          • Driver 4 – Partnerships
          • Driver 5 – Financial Sustainability
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0234/16 26-11-2019
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0234/16 26-11-2019

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2019:T023416.20191126
Date of decision
26 November 2019
Case number
T 0234/16
Petition for review of
-
Application number
12152823.6
IPC class
H01J 61/28
H01J 61/70
H01J 61/52
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 353.73 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Low-pressure mercury vapor discharge lamp with amalgam, lamp system, water treatment system, use of a lamp system

Applicant name
Signify Holding B.V.
Opponent name
Heraeus Noblelight GmbH
Board
3.4.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 52(1)
European Patent Convention Art 54 1973
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
European Patent Convention Art 84 1973
European Patent Convention Art 100(a) 1973
European Patent Convention Art 100(c) 1973
European Patent Convention Art 111(1) 1973
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
Keywords

Claims - clarity in opposition appeal proceedings

Grounds for opposition - fresh ground for opposition

Grounds for opposition - not admitted into appeal proceedings

Late-filed novelty objection - admitted (no)

New inventive step objections - admitted (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0010/91
G 0003/14
T 2233/09
T 0392/16
Citing decisions
T 1972/18

I. The appeal of the opponent concerns the interlocutory decision of the opposition division to maintain the European patent EP-B-2 447 981 as amended during the opposition proceedings (Article 101(3)(a) EPC).

II. The opposition had been filed against the patent as a whole. Grounds of opposition were lack of novelty, lack of inventive step, and extension of the subject-matter beyond the content of the parent application (Articles 100(a) and (c), 54(1) and (2), and 56 EPC 1973).

III. At the oral proceedings before the board the appellant (opponent) requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.

The respondent (patent proprietor) requested as a main request that the appeal be dismissed and, auxiliarily, that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained according to the claims of auxiliary request I filed with the reply to the grounds of appeal dated 18 August 2016.

IV. Reference is made to the following documents:

D3: |US-A-5,274,305,|

D6: |WO 2004/089429 A2,|

D10:|WO 03/001856 A1,|

D11:|WO 93/11556 A1,|

D17:|JP 10074487 A, |

D18:|JP 10074488 A. |

V. The wording of independent claims 1 and 8 of the main request, i. e. in the version maintained by the opposi­tion division, is as follows (board's labelling "(i)" and "(ii)"):

"1. A lamp system comprising a low-pressure mercury vapor discharge lamp, the lamp comprising:

- at least one discharge vessel (6) enclosing, in a gastight manner, a discharge space (8) provided with a filling of mercury and a rare gas, the discharge vessel having a first end section (28) and a second end section,

- a first electrode (10, 30) arranged at the first end section and a second electrode arranged at the second end section for maintaining a discharge along a discharge path between the first electrode and the second electrode,

- an amalgam (18) having an optimal temperature range arranged at the first end section out of the discharge path,

- a heating element (22) arranged at the first end section for heating the amalgam to a temperature within its optimal temperature range,

the lamp system further comprising

- an electronic circuit (38) arranged to generate an electrical discharge current for maintaining the discharge, and an electrical heating current for heating the heating element, independently from the electrical discharge current,

(i) - a temperature sensor for measuring the tempera­ture level at a position near the amalgam,

- a control circuit (40) for generating at least one control signal to activate the electronic circuit to generate the electrical heating current

- the control circuit (40) being programmable to generate the at least one control signal in dependence on the temperature level provided by the temperature sensor, characterized in that the lamp further comprises:

- a pressed end (14) at the first end section (28) for sealing the first end section in a gastight manner, wherein the amalgam is positioned in a recess of the pressed end (14) at the side facing the dis­charge vessel (6), whereby the heating element (22) is arranged to heat the amalgam (18) independently of the first electrode (10), or the first electrode (10) is further arranged to operate as the heating element;

or in that the lamp further comprises

- a pressed end (14) at the first end section (28) for sealing the first end section in a gastight manner, wherein the amalgam is positioned in a container encapsulating the amalgam, adjacent to the heating element and having a gas opening enabling exchange of mercury with the discharge space, whereby the first electrode (10) is further arranged to operate as the heating element."

"8. A low-pressure mercury vapor discharge lamp arranged to operate in a lamp system according to claim 1, comprising:

- at least one discharge vessel (6) enclosing, in a gastight manner, a discharge space (8) provided with a filling of mercury and a rare gas, the discharge vessel having a first end section (28) and a second end section,

- a first electrode (10, 30) arranged at the first end section and a second electrode arranged at the second end section for maintaining a discharge along a discharge path between the first electrode and the second electrode,

- an amalgam (18) having an optimal temperature range arranged at the first end section out of the discharge path,

- a heating element (22) arranged at the first end section for heating the amalgam to a temperature within its optimal temperature range,

(ii) - a temperature sensor for measuring the tempera­ture level at a position in the discharge vessel near the amalgam,

characterized in that the lamp further comprises:

- a pressed end (14) at the first end section (28) for sealing the first end section in a gastight manner, wherein the amalgam is positioned in a recess of the pressed end (14) at the side facing the dis­charge vessel (6), whereby the heating element (22) is arranged to heat the amalgam (18) independently of the first electrode (10), or the first electrode is further arranged to operate as the heating element;

or in that the lamp further comprises

- a pressed end (14) at the first end section (28) for sealing the first end section in a gastight manner, wherein the amalgam is positioned in a container encapsulating the amalgam, adjacent to the heating element and having a gas opening enabling exchange of mercury with the discharge space, whereby the first electrode is further arranged to operate as the heating element."

VI. The parties argued essentially as follows:

(a) Main request - clarity, amendments

The appellant argued that amended claim 8 of the main request lacked clarity and extended beyond the applica­tion as filed.

The respondent was of the opinion that the lack of cla­rity and added subject-matter objections should not be admitted into the proceedings and had no merits, ei­ther.

(b) Main request - novelty

During the oral proceedings before the board the appellant raised a lack of novelty objection over document D10.

In the respondent's view this new objection should not be admitted into the proceedings.

(c) Main request - inventive step

The appellant brought forward lack of inventive step objections over document D3 in combination with docu­ment D6 and over document D11 in combination with docu­ment D6. The objection based on documents D17 and D18 was withdrawn during oral proceedings before the board.

The respondent argued that the lack of inventive step objections should have been raised during the opposi­tion proceedings and therefore should not be admitted into the appeal proceedings.

1. Main request - clarity, amendments

1.1 The appellant argued that the amendment in claim 8 of the main request - effected during the opposition pro­ceedings - that the temperature sensor of the discharge lamp was for measuring the tempera­ture level at a posi­tion "in the discharge vessel" near the amalgam (see point V. above, fea­ture (ii)) rendered the claim acces­sible for a clar­i­ty objection. The position of the tem­perature sensor was in fact not determined by the amend­­­­ment. Furthermore, it was unclear whether the tem­pera­ture sensor of the discharge lamp as defined in claim 8 of the main request was also the tem­­perature sensor of the lamp system as defined in claim 1 of the main request (see point V. above, fea­ture (i)) or whether different temperature sensors were intended so that the lamp system comprises in total two temperature sensors. There was also no basis in the applica­tion as filed for the latter understanding of the claims, i. e. a lamp system comprising two temperature sensors.

1.2 The board notes first that the clarity and added sub­ject-matter objections were filed with the grounds of appeal and were - in the appellant's view - evoked by amendments effected during the oral proceedings before the opposition division. The board sees no reason to hold these objections inadmissible under Article 12(4) RPBA 2007.

1.3 However, the different interpretations of claims 1 and 8 of the main request presented by the appellant and leading to the alleged lack of clarity are based on wording which was already present in grant­ed claims 1 and 11. In particular, a tempera­ture sensor is speci­fied to be part of the lamp system in claim 1 of the main request ("the lamp sys­tem fur­ther com­pris­ing ... a temperature sen­sor"), whereas claim 8 of the main re­quest con­tains a reference to claim 1 and de­fines a temperature sensor to be part of the dis­charge lamp ("A low-pressure mercury vapor dis­charge lamp ... compris­ing ... a temperature sensor"). Pre­cise­ly the same wording is already used in the corre­sponding granted claims 1 and 11. Furthermore, in these granted claims it is merely defined that the tem­pera­ture sensor is intended to measure the temperature lev­el at a posi­tion near the amalgam without indicating the location of the sensor.

The invoked lack of clarity is therefore not introduced into the claims by the amendments effected during the opposition proceedings, but is based on wording which was already present in the granted claims. Hence, in accordance with the principles set out in the decision G 3/14 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal, the clarity objection under Article 84 EPC 1973 raised by the appellant may not be examined during the present opposition appeal proceedings.

1.4 The added subject-matter objection was first raised by the appellant in the grounds of appeal and relates to a fresh ground for opposition, namely extension of the subject-matter of the patent beyond the application as filed (first option in Article 100(c) EPC 1973), which is to be distinguished from the ground for oppo­sition concerning the extension of the subject-matter of the patent beyond the parent application (second option in Article 100(c) EPC 1973) (see T 2233/09, point 1.2 of the Reasons).

In particular, the fresh ground for opposition had not been raised by the appellant in its notice of opposi­tion, where - apart from lack of novelty and lack of inventive step - only extension of the subject-matter of the patent beyond the parent application had been raised. On the other hand, the appellant's objection is not related to any amendments effected during the oppo­sition pro­ceedings but is based on wording which was already present in the grant­ed claims and could thus well have been raised in the notice of opposition.

The Enlarged Board of Appeal held in the decision G 10/91 that a fresh ground for opposition may in principle not be introduced at the appeal stage and that an exception to this principle is only justified in case the patentee agrees that the fresh ground for opposition may be considered (see point 18 of the Reasons).

In the present case the respondent did not agree that the fresh ground for opposition may be considered dur­ing the appeal proceedings. The board has therefore no power to introduce it at the appeal stage.

In view of the above, the fresh ground for opposition concerning the exten­sion of the subject-matter of the patent beyond the application as filed is not admitted into the appeal proceedings.

2. Main request - novelty

2.1 At the oral proceedings before the board the appellant raised the objection that the subject-matter claimed according to the main request was not new over document D10 and stated that this document had already been dis­cussed in the notice of opposition.

The respondent argued that this new objection should not be admitted into the proceedings.

2.2 According to Article 12(2) RPBA 2007, the statement of the grounds of appeal must contain a party's complete case and should specify all the facts, arguments and evidence relied on.

Any amendment to a party's case after it has filed its grounds of appeal may, according to Article 13(1) RPBA 2007, be admitted and considered at the board's dis­cretion. The discretion must be exercised in view of inter alia the complexity of the new subject-matter submitted, the current state of the proceedings and the need for pro­cedural economy.

2.3 In the present case the objection of lack of novelty over document D10 was submitted for the first time at the oral proceedings before the board. Hence, this objec­tion was submitted after the statement of the grounds of appeal and is an amendment to the appel­lant's case within the meaning of Article 13(1) RPBA 2007. Conse­quent­ly, the ad­mission of this objection is at the board's discretion.

2.4 The appellant did not provide any justification for rais­ing the new objection at such a late stage of the proceedings. Indeed, the board does not see any reason why the appellant should not have been in a position to submit the objection at the earliest possible stage of the appeal proceedings, i. e. with the grounds of appeal. In this case a thorough exchange of views con­cerning the objection could have taken place already during the written stage of the appeal proceedings.

By contrast, if the new objection were admitted into the appeal proceedings at the oral hearing, the focus of the discussion could be expected to shift - at a very late stage of the appeal proceedings - to en­tire­ly new issues which had played no role in these proceed­ings up to that point. In particular, since document D10 was not even cited during the writ­ten stage of the appeal proceedings nei­ther the re­spon­dent nor the board

had any reason to consider the con­tent of D10 at that stage of the proceedings, let alone to examine whether the claimed sub­ject-matter lacked novelty in view of that docu­ment, especially since this ground for opposi­tion played no role at that stage. The new issues may well be complex and en­tail lengthy discussions, e. g. concerning the question of what is not explicitly but only implicitly dis­closed in document D10. The fact that this document had been re­ferred to in the notice of opposition is not rele­vant in this respect. In any case, it had mere­ly been dis­cussed there in the context of in­ven­­tive step and more­over the claimed sub­ject-matter has changed since ­then due to amendments effect­ed during oppo­sition pro­ceed­ings.

2.5 In view of the above considerations, exercising its discretion under Article 13(1) RPBA 2007, the board did not admit the new objec­tion of lack novelty over docu­ment D10 into the appeal proceedings.

3. Main request - inventive step

3.1 The appellant argued that the subject-matter claimed according to the main request lacked inventive step over document D3 as closest state of the art in com­bina­tion with docu­ment D6 and over document D11 as closest state of the art in combination with ­D6. The former line of attack was merely stopped but not aban­doned during oral proceedings before the opposition division.

The respondent argued that these objections should have been raised during the opposi­tion proceedings and should not be admitted into the appeal proceedings.

3.2 According to Article 12(4) RPBA 2007, everything pre­sented by the parties under Article 12(1) RPBA 2007, in particular the statement of the grounds of appeal (Article 12(1)(a) RPBA 2007), is taken into account by the board if and to the extent it relates to the case under appeal and meets the requirements of Article 12(2) RPBA 2007, the board having the power to hold inadmissible facts, evidence or requests which could have been presented or were not admitted in the first instance proceedings.

3.3 In the present case the objections of lack of inventive step on the basis of document D3 or document D11 as clos­est state of the art in combination with document D6 were submitted for the first time in the letter set­ting out the grounds of appeal.­ In the opposition pro­ceedings the appellant had merely argued in relation to inventive step of the subject-matter claimed accord­ing to the main request starting from document D6 as the closest state of the art. The objection based on docu­ments D3 and D6, which was raised during the oral pro­ceedings before the opposition division and then not further pursued, also assumed document D6 to be the closest state of the art (see points 4.20 to 4.24 of the minutes of these oral proceedings).

The board has thus the power to hold these new objec­tions, which represent a new factual framework that could have been submitted during the opposition pro­ceedings, inadmissible under Article 12(4) RPBA 2007 (see T 392/16, points 2.1 and 2.2 of the Reasons).

3.4 The appellant did not provide any justification for raising the new objections only during the appeal pro­ceedings rather than already during the opposition proceedings. The board does not see any reason why the appellant should not have been in a position to submit these objections already during the opposition pro­ceedings, in particular at the oral hearing before the opposition division, especially since the combina­tion of documents D3 and D6 had been considered during this hearing in the context of document D6 constituting the closest state of the art. In that case the objections would have been dealt with in the con­tested decision, the parties would have been in a position to com­ment on these parts of the decision and the board would be able to review the decision in this respect.

Furthermore, during the oral hearing before the opposi­tion division the appellant had admitted that document D3 did not disclose all the features of claim 1 of the main request which were not disclosed in document D6 (see point 4.24 of the minutes of the hearing). In accordance with this appraisal there are thus features in this claim which are disclosed in neither one of these documents. The objection based on documents D11 and D6 was only brief­ly discussed in the grounds of appeal using a reference to the objection based on document D3 as closest state of the art in combination with D6 and is appar­ently - as admitted by the appel­lant - less relevant than the objection based on docu­ments D3 and D6. Hence, both objections appear to lack prima facie the relevance warranting their admission into the proceedings and in-depth discussion as to their significance in relation to inventive step.

3.5 In view of the above, the board does not admit under Article 12(4) RPBA 2007 the new objec­tions of lack of inventive step of the subject-matter claimed according to the main request over

- document D3 as closest state of the art in com­bina­tion with docu­ment D6 and

- document D11 as closest state of the art in com­bi­na­tion with ­D6.

4. Conclusion

Since none of the appellant's objections under the EPC against the patent in the version maintained by the opposition divi­sion is successful, the opposition division's deci­sion maintaining the patent is to be confirmed. Con­se­quently, the appeal has to be dis­missed in accordance with the respondent's main request (Article 101(3)(a) EPC and Article 111(1) EPC 1973). Con­sidera­tion of the respondent's auxiliary request I is therefore not necessary.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility