Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • Core activities
          • Stories and insights
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0218/17 07-04-2020
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0218/17 07-04-2020

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T021817.20200407
Date of decision
07 April 2020
Case number
T 0218/17
Petition for review of
-
Application number
06021304.8
IPC class
A22C13/00
B32B1/08
B32B27/20
B32B5/18
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 380.31 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Food casings capable of transferring a functional additive from a porous inner layer onto an encased food product

Applicant name
Kalle GmbH
Opponent name
Viscofan, S.A.
Board
3.2.04
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention 100(b) (2007)
European Patent Convention 083 (2007)
Keywords
Grounds for opposition - insufficiency of disclosure (yes)
Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal was filed by the appellant (patent proprietor) against the decision of the opposition division to revoke the patent in suit (in the following, "the patent").

During the opposition proceedings, the opponent inter alia raised the ground for opposition under Article 100(b) EPC (insufficiency of disclosure).

II. The opposition division decided that the patent did not disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art.

III. The Board issued a summons to oral proceedings. In a communication in preparation for these oral proceedings it gave a preliminary opinion on the question of sufficiency, further indicating that it would be inclined to remit the case for further prosecution.

Due to the measures taken in connection with the COVID 19 crisis the Board cancelled the oral proceedings.

In a letter of 24 March 2020 the appellant-proprietor subsequently withdrew its request for oral proceedings.

IV. The appellant-proprietor requests that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained according to the main request (as granted) or alternatively, in accordance with one of auxiliary requests I and II, both filed with the grounds of appeal.

The respondent opponent requests dismissal of the appeal as well as requesting oral proceedings.

Both parties request remittal for further prosecution.

V. The independent claim 1 of the main request reads as follows:

"1. A multilayered coextruded stretched thermoplastic food casing comprising:

at least one porous inner layer, wherein the porosity of the porous inner layer has been at least partially generated by stretching of the coextruded casing, wherein the porosity as measured as indicated herein of the sum of all porous inner layers is in the range from 5 to 70 % by volume, and at least an innermost porous inner layer has an interconnected porosity, such that said innermost porous inner layer is able to absorb, retain, desorb and to transfer at least one transferable functional additive from said at least one porous inner layer to food encased in said casing,

at least one layer having a barrier effect for water vapor, at least one layer having adhesion properties, said layer having adhesion properties optionally being the same as or different from said porous inner layer and/or said layer having barrier effect for water vapor".

Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request reads as for the main request except that the wording "wherein the porosity is measured as indicated herein" is deleted.

Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request reads as claim 1 of the first auxiliary request except that at the end of the claim the following wording is added:

"wherein said at least one porous inner layer comprises at least one fine-grained filler and wherein the porous inner layer comprises pore channels having diameters in the range from 0.1 to 80 mym".

VI. In the present decision, reference is made to the following documents:

D6 : R. Ziel et al, "Quantification of the pore size distribution (porosity profiles) in microfiltration membranes by SEM, TEM and computer image analysis", Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, pages 241 to 246

D7 : Wikipedia article on porosity, last edited on 13 October 2015, filed on 26 October 2015.

D10a to D10c: SEM photographs of casings according to the invention at different scales, filed with letter of 26 October 2015.

D11: Manuel del Cerro et al "Volume determination under the microscope, the simple way: The Delesse principle" Micscape Magazine 2009.

D12: Laura Espinal "Porosity and its measurement" Characterization of materials, edited by E. N. Kaufmann, Wiley, 12 October 2012.

D18: Wikipedia article "Scanning electron microscope", last edited on 19 December 2019, filed on 23 January 2020.

VII. The appellant-proprietor's arguments can be summarised as follows:

The porosity of the layers is to be measured using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) or SEM photographs. At the priority date the skilled person was able to measure porosity taking into account pores of all sizes, not just those said to be detectable in D12 figure 6, because SEMs have adjustable magnification over a much wider range. Furthermore, by stitching images to make a composite image, larger structures can be detected at a high magnification. Therefore the invention as claimed in claim 1 is sufficiently disclosed.

VIII. The respondent-opponent's arguments can be summarised as follows:

The invention cannot be carried out. According to D12, figure 6, only pores up to 10mym can be detected by SEM. Larger pores, which make a significant contribution to total porosity in food casings as those claimed, can not be detected. Therefore, at the priority date, the skilled person would not be able to measure porosity of the casings and the invention is not sufficiently disclosed.

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. Background

The invention relates to synthetic food casings. In particular, the invention relates to multi-layered coextruded stretched thermoplastic food casings of which at least one is a porous inner layer. The surfaces of the hollow spaces and pore channels may be able to absorb additives, store them and transfer them to the food product (see the published patent specification, paragraph [0001]).

Claim 1 in all its versions defines a range of [total] porosity of the sum of all porous inner layers, expressed as a percentage. The patent (see published patent specification, paragraph [0037]) discloses to measure this total porosity on cross sections of casings using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) or SEM photographs.

3. Main request, claim 1, sufficiency of disclosure

3.1 In its communication dated 12 September 2019, section 2, the Board set out its preliminary opinion regarding this matter. The relevant section of the opinion is reproduced below:

2. Sufficiency of disclosure, main request, claim 1, Article 100(b) EPC

2.1 According to established jurisprudence, an invention sufficiently disclosed if the skilled person, based the application as a whole and using their general knowledge, can perform the invention in the whole claimed, see the Case Law of the Boards of Appeal the EPO, 8th edition, 2016 (CLBA) II.C.

2.2 The appellant-proprietor challenges the impugned decision's finding that the invention as claimed is insufficiently disclosed. The decision found, amongst other things, that the skilled person would not be able to measure the porosity of the sum of all porous inner layers, and so would not be able to carry out the invention. The appellant-proprietor argues that the patent itself contains enough information for the skilled person to be able to measure the porosity, in particular by means of a scanning electron microscope (SEM), as the patent explains.

2.3 It is not in dispute (see D7) that porosity of a material is defined as the volume of voids divided by the total volume, and can be expressed as a percentage. Nor, by the same token, would porosity appear to be an unusual way of characterising a porous material as claimed.

2.4 The patent explains (see page 7, lines 2 to 3) that pores in the food casing material can be closed pores or open channels. The total porosity is the sum of this closed and interconnected porosity. Indeed, since both closed pores and channels are voids, the skilled person would know that both should contribute to the total porosity according to the above definition.

2.5 The patent explains (see published patent specification, paragraph [0037]), that "the porosity of the different layers may be measured on cross-sections of casings or films prepared with a cryo-microtome. The measurements of the (total) porosity may be performed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) or on SEM photographs, e.g. with the aid of measurement lines counting the number of points or measurement lengths for the porosity in relation to the total number of points respectively length of the total measurement length."

2.6 In the Board's view, this statement gives the skilled person a clear indication that they can measure total porosity using an SEM, or SEM photographs on a cryo-microtome sample, whether or not other methods might also be usable to measure the total porosity. In this respect, the Board notes that, according to established jurisprudence (see CLBA, II.C.4.2, and the cases cited), an invention is in principle sufficiently disclosed if at least one way enabling the skilled person to carry out the invention is clearly indicated.

2.7 Although the opposition division correctly noted (impugned decision, page 6, last but one paragraph, last sentence) that the SEM and mercury pressure penetration techniques will give different values of porosity, the Board does not agree that the skilled person merely learns from the patent that there are two alternative ways of measuring porosity.

According to the patent (see published patent specification, page 7, lines 5 to 7 and paragraph [0098]), the interconnected porosity can be measured by the mercury pressure penetration method. In the Board's view, the skilled person understands from this that the mercury penetration method measures only the contribution to the total porosity due to open channels, independently of the porosity due to closed pores.

With this in mind, far from the skilled person being at a loss to decide which porosity measurement (SEM or mercury penetration) explained in the patent they should use to measure porosity of the sum of all layers (total porosity), they would use the SEM method.

2.8 It appears not to be in dispute that the skilled person knows that the volumetric fraction of a discrete distributed component in a three dimensional composite can be accurately calculated from the (microscopically measured) area of the component in the composite's cross section (cf. D11, pages 4 to 7, "volume estimates under the microscope").

2.9 The question however arises as to whether, at the priority date, the SEM method would have been able to measure the area of the pores in the porous inner layers claimed, allowing the porosity of the sum of all porous inner layers to be calculated, with sufficient accuracy.

2.9.1 Regarding this question, the parties have referred to D6 (quantification of the pore size distribution in microfiltration membranes). Although D6 is post-published, the parties appear not to dispute that this reflects the skilled person's general knowledge at the priority date of the patent. Nor does the Board see any reason to doubt that this is so.

2.9.2 The respondent-opponent has argued, with reference to D6, introduction, that only qualitative information on pores could be obtained from SEM methods at the priority date of the patent.

2.9.3 Whether or not the microfiltration membranes described in D6 are structurally similar to thermoplastic food casings as claimed, D6 (see introduction, first paragraph) states that SEM is "a widely used technique to provide direct and detailed structural information including the shape and size of individual pores inside the membrane and at the membrane surface" [emphasis added by the Board]. Furthermore, the Board has no reason to doubt that, at the relevant date, the skilled person was not aware of computer image analysis from their general knowledge, as discussed in D6 (see abstract). Thus, D6 appears to confirm what the patent discloses (see paragraph [0036] again): namely that, at the priority date, the skilled person was able to derive quantitative information about a membrane's porosity using an SEM technique (as well as being able to deriving qualitative information about pores in a membrane).

2.9.4 A further question arising is whether the pores in a thermoplastic food casing are of a size which can be measured using an SEM technique. In its grounds of appeal (page 4, first paragraph), the appellant-proprietor explains that very small pores (the Board infers those to be smaller than 2nm, corresponding to the smallest pores in the mesopore range) cannot be detected (cf. post published D12, section starting on page 5, right hand column, titled "microscopy"). It may therefore need to be considered whether smaller (non measurable pores) would significantly contribute to the porosity of a casing as claimed. In this respect, the Board notes that the smallest pore diameters mentioned in the patent (see paragraph [0036], 0.01mym), are 10nm, thus five times larger than 2nm. In its reply to the appeal (see page 5, second paragraph), the respondent-opponent asserts that it is common knowledge that thermoplastic food casing comprise micropores (size less than 2nm), this they appear to argue is proven by D7, page 4. D7 is a Wikipedia article about porosity. However, it does not mention food casings, let alone offer a characterisation of pores in food casings. The fact that on page 4 it is stated that, in solids, microporosity refers to pores smaller than 2nm, does not, in the board's view, prove that these are normally present in food casings, much less demonstrate that such pores might significantly contribute to their total porosity as the respondent-opponent has speculated.

2.9.5 The respondent-opponent also argues (reply to appeal, page 5, third paragraph) that D12, figure 6 demonstrates that the SEM method cannot be used to measure pore diameters greater than 10mym (10000nm). Similarly, the appellant-proprietor argues (see grounds of appeal, page 4, first paragraph) that pores that are "too large" to be measured by the SEM method do not, according to the patent, contribute to the total porosity. It may need to be discussed what pore diameter would be "too large".

In this respect, the appellant-proprietor appears to argue that any pores above this upper limit of SEM detection should simply be considered as not contributing to the total porosity.

2.9.6 If indeed the upper limit of pore diameter the skilled person can measure (too large) is around 10mym, it seems (cf. published patent specification, paragraph [0036] again) that many pores in a food casing would not be measurable, although they would inevitably make a significant contribution to the actual total porosity. In the Board's view, ignoring all pores larger than a certain limit, say 10mym, would mean that the skilled person would never know whether the porosity they had calculated corresponded in any way to the actual porosity of the casing.

In the Board's view, this could but lead to the conclusion that the invention could not be carried out by the skilled person. In other words that the invention as claimed is not sufficiently disclosed.

Therefore, exploring this point appears to be crucial in deciding whether or not the invention as claimed in claim 1 is sufficiently disclosed".

3.2 In the concluding two points of this section of the communication (2.9.5 and 2.9.6), the Board identified an important question for deciding on the issue of sufficiency of disclosure. The Board summarises this question as follows: Is the skilled person, at the priority date, able to measure sum porosity of casing layers, including contributions of those pores with a diameter between 10 and 200mym, using SEM detection [or using SEM photographs]?

3.3 Taking into account the written submissions of the parties, including those subsequent to the communication, the Board considers that this question must be answered in the negative. Therefore the subject matter of claim 1 is insufficiently disclosed. The reasons are as follows.

3.4 The appellant-proprietor has replied to this question in a letter of 22 January 2020 (see page 3). It argued that, in SEM detection the magnification factor can be varied over a wide range, the range in D12, figure 6 being only a preferred range. To support this statement the appellant proprietor cited D18 (page 7 "magnification"), which states that SEM magnification varies between 1:10 up to 1: 3000000.

3.4.1 Assuming that post published D18 indeed reflects common general knowledge regarding SEM at the date of priority, the appellant-proprietor's argument that SEM magnification can be adjusted as disclosed in D18 has not convinced the Board that the skilled person would be able to measure porosity of each layer using SEM, taking into account the contribution of pores greater than 10mym.

3.4.2 As the respondent-opponent has pointed out (see letter of 24 February 2020), D12, figure 6, does not show a magnification range. It shows the range of pore sizes which can be detected by SEM (2nm to 10mym). Only a small proportion of possible pore sizes found in a typical casing according to the invention overlap with this band and would thus be detectable. For example (see published patent specification, paragraph [0036]), pores can range between 0.01mym (10nm) and 20000 times larger at 200mym. Whilst the smallest pores would be detectable according to D12, figure 6, the larger ones would not.

3.4.3 Moreover, the appellant proprietor has not provided any information on how magnification range relates to detectable pore size range. In the Board's view, as well as magnification, other factors, such as resolution and field of view also determine the range of pore size that SEM can measure.

3.4.4 Therefore, in the Board's view, being able to adjust the magnification range of an SEM as D18 suggests does not prove that all the pores of the sizes typically present in casings as claimed, and their contribution to the total porosity, would be detectable. Consequently, it is not proven that it would be possible to calculate the total porosity of a layer by simply viewing it using SEM or SEM photographs.

3.5 As with D18, the differently scaled SEM photographs D10a to D10c are not prior art. They are said to represent SEM photographs of casings according to the invention at different scales, and showing pore size between 0.1 mym and about 20 mym. However, because they do not show smaller or bigger pores, this does not not demonstrate that such pores are absent, but could merely confirm the known limits of SEM in detecting larger or smaller pore size.

3.6 Nor does the Board come to a different view in the light of the appellant-proprietor's further argument, according to which, to display larger structures in stronger magnification, it is known to change the position of the object in the microscope and then combine individually derived images by what it refers to as "stitching", to form a complete image.

3.6.1 The Board acknowledges that this stitching-together of multiple images would, in effect, increase the field of view. This might well allow more pores, including larger ones, to be displayed and their contribution to total porosity measured, whilst still being able to measure the smaller ones. However, this "stitching" method is not mentioned in the patent itself, which merely discloses (paragraph [0037]) to measure, for example with the aid of measurement lines, under an SEM or on SEM photographs.

3.6.2 Moreover, the appellant-proprietor has not provided any evidence that might have convinced the Board that such a "stitching" method was generally known to the skilled person at the priority date of the patent. Therefore, the argument that, at the priority date, the skilled person can carry out the invention by applying this method is moot.

3.7 Furthermore, the Board notes that as is clear from paragraph [0036] of the patent, pores over 10mym form an important part of distribution of pore sizes of pores of the porous inner layers of the food casing. Thus, d95 is preferably in the range 10 to 350mym, with the average d50 preferably between 0.1 and 50mym. Clearly, the contribution of such large size pores to the pore distribution is not negligible such that a SEM measurement might have produced a representative value of sum porosity. Indeed the respondent opponent's calculations, page 4 of their reply of 24 February 2020, show that for typical values of d50 and d95 SEM would be unable to measure the majority of pore sizes. Thus it cannot provide a reliable measure of sum porosity. As the patent does not otherwise indicate how this definitive parameter of the porous inner layer of the claimed food casing is to be measured, the claimed invention is not sufficiently disclosed.

3.8 Finally, the Board is unconvinced by the respondent's argument that claimed total porosity is to be understood as only the volume of pores that can be determined by SEM. This argument contradicts their earlier argument in relation to D18 and D10 that SEM can measure total porosity across the whole range of pore sizes. Moreover, it conflicts with the significant contribution of large pores to the distribution of pore sizes as can be inferred from specification paragraph [0036] discussed above.

3.9 The Board concludes that the arguments presented by the appellant-proprietor have not convinced the Board that the invention according to claim 1 is sufficiently disclosed. Therefore this request must fail.

4. Auxiliary requests.

4.1 The Board informed the parties of its preliminary opinion (see communication of 12 September 2019, section 3) that the issue of sufficiency of disclosure as discussed for the main request also applied to the auxiliary requests since, also in these requests, the skilled person needed to be able to make a casing having a porosity in the range of 5% to 70%.

4.2 The appellant-proprietor has not provided any argument as to why the auxiliary requests should succeed if the main request were to fail. Nor does the Board see any reason to deviate from its preliminary opinion. Therefore, the Board concludes that claim 1 of the auxiliary requests fails for the same reasons as apply to the main request.

5. Since the invention according to claim 1 of all the requests is insufficiently disclosed, the Board must dismiss the appeal.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility