Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Technologies
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • Core activities
          • Stories and insights
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0590/17 07-07-2021
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0590/17 07-07-2021

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2021:T059017.20210707
Date of decision
07 July 2021
Case number
T 0590/17
Petition for review of
-
Application number
10172026.6
IPC class
G01G 23/01
G01G 19/44
G01G 21/22
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 472.23 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Weight measuring apparatus for use as an input device of a game apparatus

Applicant name

Nintendo Co., Ltd.

Hosiden Corporation

Opponent name
Bigben Interactive SA
Board
3.4.02
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 76(1)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(2)
Keywords

Requests: Admission in first-instance proceedings and consideration in appeal proceedings (main request: yes)

Extension beyond the content of the earlier application as filed (main request: yes)

Admission of requests filed during the appeal proceedings (first to fourth auxiliary requests: no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0989/15
T 0954/17
Citing decisions
-

I. The patent proprietors and the opponent lodged an appeal against the interlocutory decision of the opposition division, finding European patent No. 2241869 as amended according to Auxiliary Request 4B then on file to meet the requirements of the EPC. The patent was based on a divisional application to the earlier European patent application No. 08001659.5.

II. The opposition filed by the opponent against the patent as a whole was based on the grounds for opposition of added subject-matter in respect of the earlier application as filed (Article 100(c) EPC), and of lack of novelty and of inventive step (Article 100(a) together with Articles 52(1), 54 and 56 EPC).

In its decision the opposition division concluded, inter alia, as follows:

- Auxiliary Request 4B was admitted into the proceedings, and

- the patent as amended according to Auxiliary Request 4B met the requirements of the EPC, and in particular those set forth in Articles 76(1), 123(2), 84 and 56 EPC.

III. In a communication under Article 15(1) of the revised Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA 2020, OJ EPO 2019, A63) annexed to the summons to oral proceedings issued on 14 September 2020, the board presented a preliminary assessment of the case.

IV. With their letter dated 4 June 2021, the patent proprietors submitted amended claims according to auxiliary requests 1 to 7. As their main request, they requested that the opponent's appeal be dismissed and that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of Auxiliary Request 4B.

V. Oral proceedings were held before the board on 7 July 2021.

During the oral proceedings the patent proprietors submitted amended claims according to a new auxiliary request 4.

The patent proprietors requested as main request that the opponent's appeal be dismissed and, as an alternative, that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the European patent be maintained as amended according to auxiliary request 1 filed as auxiliary request 3 by letter dated 4 June 2021 or auxiliary request 2 filed as auxiliary request 5 by letter dated 4 June 2021 or auxiliary request 3 filed as auxiliary request 6 by letter dated 4 June 2021 or auxiliary request 4 filed at the oral proceedings dated 7 July 2021.

The opponent requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the European patent be revoked.

At the end of the oral proceedings the chairman announced the decision of the board.

VI. Claim 1 of Auxiliary Request 4B, on which the decision under appeal is based, reads as follows:

"A weight measuring apparatus (10) for use as an input device of a game apparatus, the weight measuring apparatus comprising:

a battery (35) for power supply;

a load platform (11) for receiving a pressure load;

a plurality of load sensors (12) provided on the bottom surface of the weight measuring apparatus as leg portions and supporting the load platform for detecting a pressure load, each load sensor generating a detected load signal and comprising a strain element (23);

an amplifier (34) for each load sensor (12), each amplifier being connected to an A/D converter (32)

a microcomputer (31) operationally connected to each of the load sensors (12) through the amplifier and A/D converter and configured to receive each digitized detected load signal at the same time;

connecting means (13) to operationally connect the microcomputer (31) to the game apparatus configured to transmit data indicating the detected load signals of the respective load sensors, each load signal comprising identification information for the respective load sensor (12) wherein calibration data (Fig. 9) for each of the load sensors is stored on the microcomputer (31), the calibration data for each of the load sensors being obtained from the respective load sensor at a time when a load having a predetermined weight is applied to the load sensor."

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 differs from claim 1 of Auxiliary Request 4B in that the final feature "obtained from the respective load sensor at a time when a load having a predetermined weight is applied to the load sensor" is replaced by the feature "obtained by the sequential application of loads having different weights to the corresponding load sensor".

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 in that the feature "and comprising a strain element (23)" is replaced by the feature "and comprising a strain-gage type load cell comprising a strain element (23)".

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 in the insertion of the following feature at the end of the claim: "and wherein the weight measuring apparatus is configured to provide the calibration data (Fig. 9) to the game apparatus".

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 reads as follows:

"A weight measuring apparatus (10) for use as an input device of a game apparatus, the weight measuring apparatus comprising:

a battery (35) for power supply;

a load platform (11) for receiving a pressure load;

a plurality of load sensors (12) provided on the bottom surface of the weight measuring apparatus as leg portions and supporting the load platform for detecting a pressure load, each load sensor generating a detected load signal and comprising a strain-gage type load cell comprising a strain element (23);

an amplifier (34) for each load sensor (12), each amplifier being connected to an A/D converter (32)

a microcomputer (31) operationally connected to each of the load sensors (12) through the amplifier and A/D converter and configured to receive each digitized detected load signal at the same time, wherein calibration data (Fig. 9) for each of the load sensors is stored on the microcomputer (31), the calibration data for each of the load sensors being obtained by the sequential application of loads having different weights to the corresponding sensor;

connecting means (13) to operationally connect the microcomputer (31) to the game apparatus configured to transmit data indicating the detected load signals of the respective load sensors and the calibration data (Fig. 9), each load signal comprising identification information for the respective load sensor (12)."

1. The appeal of the patent proprietors and the appeal of the opponent are admissible.

2. Auxiliary Request 4B

2.1 Admittance issues

2.1.1 Admission of Auxiliary Request 4B into the first-instance proceedings by the opposition division

In its statement of grounds of appeal, the opponent contested the opposition division's decision to admit into the proceedings the then Auxiliary Request 4B during the oral proceedings and requested that the admission of this request be reviewed by the board. The opponent submitted, in particular, that the opposition division held in the decision under appeal that the request was not "clearly not allowable", and that for this reason the opposition division, when exercising its discretion, applied the wrong criteria because a request submitted during oral proceedings could only be accepted if the request was clearly allowable, i.e. if it overcame prima facie all the raised objections.

The board notes, however, that the amended claims of Auxiliary Request 4B were submitted during the first-instance oral proceedings in reaction to new objections under Article 76(1) EPC raised for the first time during the oral proceedings. The opposition division subsequently examined the allowability of the amendments on a prima facie basis, and in particular - following, as noted by the patent proprietors, the criteria indicated in the Guidelines (2016), Part E-II, 8.6 - on the basis of the question of whether they were "clearly not allowable", and it concluded that Auxiliary Request 4B was not "clearly not allowable", so that this request could therefore be admitted into the proceedings.

In view of these considerations, the board sees no reason to conclude that the opposition division has exercised its discretion by applying wrong principles or the wrong criteria or in an unreasonable way, or for otherwise reviewing and overturning the opposition division's decision to admit Auxiliary Request 4B into the first-instance proceedings.

2.1.2 Consideration of Auxiliary Request 4B in appeal proceedings

With their statement of grounds of appeal, the patent proprietors requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained as granted or as amended according to a series of auxiliary requests. In reply to the statement of grounds of appeal of the opponent requesting the revocation of the patent, the patent proprietors disputed the arguments submitted by the opponent in respect of Auxiliary Request 4B underlying the decision under appeal. They did not explicitly request, either in their reply or in their subsequent letter dated 5 February 2018, that the opponent's appeal be dismissed or that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of Auxiliary Request 4B. However, in their letter dated 4 June 2021 filed in preparation for the oral proceedings, the patent proprietors explicitly requested, as main request, that the opponent's appeal be dismissed, i.e., that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of the Auxiliary Request 4B, which the opposition division found to fulfil the requirements of the EPC.

The opponent submitted that the patent proprietors requested in their statement of grounds of appeal that the patent be maintained as granted or as amended according to different auxiliary requests, that in their reply to the opponent's appeal they did not modify these requests, and that they indicated for the first time during the appeal proceedings with the letter dated 4 June 2021 that the main request was the patent as amended according to Auxiliary Request 4B. The opponent further submitted that, in these circumstances, the present main request constituted an amendment to the patent proprietors' appeal case within the meaning of Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 and also within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, and that the admission of the present main request into the appeal proceedings should be refused in view of the substantive objections raised in respect of Auxiliary Request 4B and in view of the fact that no exceptional circumstance would justify the admission of the main request into the appeal proceedings.

However, as already noted by the board in its communication annexed to the summons to the oral proceedings, the fact that the patent proprietors, in their letter of reply to the opponent's statement of grounds of appeal, contested the opponent's substantive submissions relating to Auxiliary Request 4B meant that this request was implicitly maintained by the patent proprietors. In addition, according to Article 12(4) RPBA 2007 (which applies in the present case according to Article 25(2) RPBA 2020) "everything presented by the parties" under Article 12(1) RPBA 2007 (which largely corresponds to the provisions of Article 12(1) RPBA 2020), and in particular the reply of a party to the statement of grounds of appeal filed by another party, "shall be taken into account by the Board if and to the extent it relates to the case under appeal and meets the requirements in (2) [i.e. Article 12(2) RPBA 2007]". In this context, the board notes that these requirements largely correspond to those of Article 12(3) RPBA 2020.

In view of these considerations, the board is of the opinion that Auxiliary Request 4B was further pursued by the patent proprietors in their reply to the opponent's statement of grounds of appeal, although not necessarily within the scope of a main request. Therefore, and in the absence of any other ground, the patent proprietors' request that the opponent's appeal be dismissed and thus the opposition division's decision that the patent as amended according to Auxiliary Request 4B met the requirements of the EPC be upheld, was to be taken into account by the board in accordance with Article 12(4) RPBA 2007. In addition, the mere fact of subsequently promoting the mentioned request as their main request did not constitute an amendment to the patent proprietors' appeal case within the meaning of Article 13(1) or (2) RPBA 2020.

For all these reasons, the opponent's request that the present main request of the patent proprietors not be admitted and thus Auxiliary Request 4B not be considered cannot be allowed.

2.2 Article 76(1) EPC

2.2.1 In its decision the opposition division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 of Auxiliary Request 4B, and in particular the feature relating to the calibration data for each of the load sensors "being obtained from the respective load sensor at a time when a load having a predetermined weight is applied to the load sensor", complied with the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC.

The opponent contested the opposition division's finding in this respect and submitted in particular that the mentioned feature relating to how the calibration data was obtained extended beyond the content of the earlier application as filed. More particularly, the calibration data referred to in claim 1 was disclosed in the earlier application as filed as being obtained by the sequential application of loads having different weights to the load sensors as explained in the description of the earlier application as filed, and the omission of this feature in present claim 1 constituted an unallowable intermediate generalisation of the content of the earlier application as filed.

2.2.2 The board first notes that the earlier application as filed (see paragraphs [0002] and [0007] of the publication (EP 2056080 A2) of the earlier application as filed) discloses a weight measuring apparatus for use with a game apparatus (see, for instance, Fig. 3A to 3H and Fig. 5), a weight applying unit for obtaining calibration data used for performing calibration of the weight measuring apparatus (see, for instance, Fig. 8A, and claim 1 of the earlier application as filed), and a method of obtaining calibration data with the weight applying unit.

Claim 1 of Auxiliary Request 4B is directed to the weight measuring apparatus disclosed in the earlier application as filed, and the claims require that the apparatus comprises a microcomputer having calibration data stored therein. According to the earlier application as filed, the calibration data stored in the microcomputer of the claimed apparatus is obtained by a method involving

- the step of applying a load having a predetermined weight to each of the load sensor sections of the weight measuring apparatus using the weight applying unit and causing the microcomputer of the apparatus to store a value output from each of the load sensor sections, thereby performing a calibration (paragraph [0071], together with the subsequent detailed explanation in paragraphs [0072] to [0077]), followed by

- the repetition of the mentioned step with a load having a different weight (paragraph [0078]), whereby "the calibration [...] is finished" (paragraph [0078], last sentence) and the resulting data stored in the microcomputer contains a detection value output from each load cell each time a load having a different weight is applied (lines 11 to 19 of paragraph [0078]; see also Fig. 9, 15 and 16 and the corresponding description).

The further embodiment disclosed in paragraphs [0083] to [0088] of the earlier application as filed is - as noted by the opponent - also based on the approach mentioned above.

The skilled person would therefore understand that the calibration data stored in the microcomputer of the weight measuring apparatus disclosed in the earlier application as filed specifically corresponds to the calibration data obtained by the sequential application of loads having different weights referred to above. Claim 1 of Auxiliary Request 4B, however, only requires that the calibration data stored in the microcomputer is "obtained from the respective load sensor at a time when a load having a predetermined weight is applied to the load sensor", and the data obtained in this manner is disclosed in the earlier application as filed not as the actual calibration data stored in the microcomputer for each of the load sensors, but only as part of it. For this reason, the claimed subject-matter constitutes an intermediate generalisation of the content of the earlier application as filed.

In addition, in the board's opinion, this intermediate generalisation is not directly and unambiguously derivable from the content of the earlier application as filed and is, therefore, unallowable.

2.2.3 The patent proprietors submitted that, as concluded by the opposition division in its decision, the use of several weights disclosed in the passage at lines 6 to 22 of paragraph [0078] of the earlier application as filed reading "For example, loads of 34kg, 68kg and 102kg are sequentially applied [...]" would directly and unambiguously be understood by the skilled person as a mere example.

The board agrees with the patent proprietors in so far as the mentioned passage discloses in its technical context an example relating to the use of specifically three loads each having a specific weight. Not, however, in the sense that the sequential application of different loads itself would only be an example of the method of obtaining the calibration data subsequently stored in the microcomputer of the weight measuring apparatus disclosed in the earlier application because the mentioned passage only discloses an example of the more general disclosure in paragraph [0078], first sentence, relating to the repetition with loads having different weights of the step of applying a load to each of the load sensors and causing the microcomputer to store the corresponding detection values.

2.2.4 The patent proprietors also submitted that the earlier application as filed was directed to the calibration of a weight measuring apparatus having load sensors on its bottom surface as leg portions thereof not by applying a weight on the load platform of the apparatus as in the prior art, but by turning the apparatus upside down and applying the weight on the load sensors (Fig. 1 and 2 and the corresponding description). In addition, the method involved the application of only "a weight" on the load sensors (paragraph [0053]), and not necessarily the application of different weights as also derivable from a comparison between claims 19 and 20, between paragraphs [0044] and [0045], and between paragraphs [0071] and [0078] of the earlier application as filed. The skilled person would therefore understand that the sequential application of loads having different weights was only optional.

The board, however, does not find these arguments convincing. The earlier application as filed refers indeed to the use of a weight or load (see, in particular, paragraphs [0053], [0044] and [0071], and claim 19), but only when describing the operation with the weight applying unit for the purpose of obtaining calibration data. In addition, claim 1 does not refer to calibration data obtained with the weight applying unit or with the corresponding method of obtention of calibration data with this apparatus, but to the calibration data specifically stored in the microcomputer of the weight measuring apparatus. Moreover, according to the earlier application as filed this specific calibration data is not only obtained by the step of applying a load to the load sensors, but - as already noted in point 2.2.2 above - by the repetition of this step with loads having different weights.

2.2.5 The patent proprietors also submitted that, even assuming that the claimed subject-matter constituted an intermediate generalisation, this generalisation would be allowable because the skilled person would understand that the earlier application as filed did not disclose two different methods of determination of calibration data, but only one, and thus the skilled person would not be presented with new information.

However, there is no disclosure in the earlier application as filed from which the skilled person could derive - even using its common general knowledge - that calibration data merely obtained by application of only one load to each of the load sensors would be sufficient to perform a calibration of the claimed weight measuring apparatus - let alone, as submitted by the opponent, to perform a proper calibration of the same as required by the disclosure of the earlier application as filed relating to the claimed weight measuring apparatus.

2.2.6 The board concludes that the subject-matter of claim 1 of Auxiliary Request 4B extends beyond the content of the earlier application as filed (Article 76(1) EPC). Therefore, the patent proprietors' main request is not allowable.

3. Auxiliary request 1 - Admittance under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020

3.1 The patent proprietors filed the claims of auxiliary request 1 with their letter dated 4 June 2021.

In the present case, the summons to oral proceedings was notified after the date of entry into force of the revised version of RPBA 2020 which is 1 January 2020, see Article 24(1) RPBA 2020. Thus, pursuant to Article 25(1) and (3) RPBA 2020, Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 applies to the question of whether to admit auxiliary request 1, which was filed after notification of the summons to oral proceedings and is therefore an amendment within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020. Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 implements the third level of the convergent approach applicable in appeal proceedings (see Supplementary publication 2, OJ EPO 2020, explanatory remarks on Article 13(2), first paragraph, first sentence).

According to Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, "[a]ny amendment to a party's appeal case made [...] after notification of a summons to oral proceedings shall, in principle, not be taken into account unless there were exceptional circumstances, which had been justified with cogent reasons by the party concerned", i.e. in the present case by the patent proprietors.

3.2 Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 differs from claim 1 of Auxiliary Request 4B in that the calibration data for each of the load sensors is said to be "obtained by the sequential application of loads having different weights to the corresponding load sensor".

The opponent submitted that claim 1 had been amended to overcome the objection under Article 76(1) EPC addressed in point 2.2 above, which had already been raised in the first-instance proceedings and also in the opponent's statement of grounds of appeal. In the opponent's view, the patent proprietors, instead of waiting for guidance from the board, could have filed this request at an earlier stage of the proceedings, and, for these reasons, there was no exceptional circumstance justifying the admission of this request into the proceedings under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

The patent proprietors submitted that since the opponent had raised a considerable number of independent and complex objections during the proceedings and in particular with the statement of grounds of appeal, a large number of auxiliary requests, each addressing one of the respective objections, and, in addition, combinations of these auxiliary requests would have had to be made in the form of further auxiliary requests, resulting in an excessively high number of auxiliary requests. They further argued that this approach would have been highly ineffective and contrary to procedural economy and that, in view of these exceptional circumstances, the submission of the claims of the present auxiliary request 1 after the board had issued the communication annexed to the summons to oral proceedings was appropriate, and that therefore the request should be admitted into the proceedings. In addition, during the appeal proceedings the opponent did not point specifically to the omission in claim 1 of the sequential application of weights as constituting an objection under Article 76(1) EPC.

3.3 The board first notes that claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 represents an amendment to the patent proprietors' case in appeal within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, and that the amendment is directed to overcome the objection under Article 76(1) EPC addressed in point 2.2 above.

3.3.1 In addition, this objection was not raised for the first time in the board's communication annexed to the summons, but was already raised by the opponent in its statement of grounds of appeal. In particular, contrary to the patent proprietors' submissions, the opponent already submitted in its statement of grounds of appeal (page 8/15, second paragraph) that the sequential application of a plurality of different weights was disclosed as essential in the earlier application as filed and that its omission constituted an unallowable intermediate generalisation.

Therefore, the claims of auxiliary request 1 could have been filed at an earlier stage of the proceedings, and in particular with the patent proprietors' reply to the statement of grounds of appeal filed by the opponent.

3.3.2 As regards the patent proprietors' submissions that, in the circumstances of the case, filing auxiliary requests would not have been procedurally appropriate, the board notes the following:

On the one hand, it might have been excessive and procedurally impractical to have filed amendments in reply to each one of the numerous and complex objections raised by the opponent (in particular, under Articles 76(1) and 123(2) EPC) in respect of the claims of Auxiliary Request 4B in their statement of grounds of appeal as all these amendments together with the possible alternative combinations thereof would have resulted in a high number of auxiliary requests.

On the other hand, however, these circumstances did not justify refraining - as the patent proprietors did - from filing any auxiliary request at all in due time and waiting for the board's preliminary assessment of the opponent's objections in order to react and file appropriate auxiliary requests overcoming specific objections addressed by the board. On the contrary, the patent proprietors could - and should - at least have attempted to overcome some of the opponent's objections, or partial aspects thereof, by filing an appropriate number of auxiliary requests.

In view of these considerations, and in particular given the fact that the patent proprietors did not attempt to file any auxiliary request in reply to the opponent's objections in due time, in particular to the opponent's objection mentioned in point 3.3.1 above, the board sees no exceptional circumstances which have been justified with cogent reasons by the patent proprietors in support of the admission of the amendments to claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 into the proceedings under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

3.4 In view of the above considerations, the board exercised its discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 and decided not to admit auxiliary request 1 into the proceedings.

4. Auxiliary request 2 - Admittance under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020

4.1 The claims of auxiliary request 2 were also filed with the letter dated 4 June 2021.

Thus, pursuant to Article 25(1) and (3) RPBA 2020, Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 applies to the question of whether to admit auxiliary request 2, which was filed after notification of the summons to oral proceedings and is therefore an amendment within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

Claim 1 of this request differs from claim 1 of Auxiliary Request 4B, inter alia, in that the feature "comprising a strain element (23)" has been replaced by the feature "comprising a strain-gage type load cell comprising a strain element (23)".

The patent proprietors submitted that the mentioned amendment was a direct reaction to the objection raised by the board in its communication and according to which the parent application did not appear to generally disclose load sensors comprising a strain element, but only load sensors comprising a load cell of the strain-gage type operating with a strain element, so that claim 1 would appear to constitute an unallowable intermediate generalisation of the content of the earlier application as filed (Article 76(1) EPC). This objection was different from the objections raised by the opponent during the proceedings, and therefore the objection was new and constituted exceptional circumstances justifying the admission of auxiliary request 2 into the appeal proceedings under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

The opponent submitted that the board's objection mentioned by the patent proprietors had already been raised during the first-instance proceedings (see, for instance, minutes of the first-instance proceedings, time 09:23, second sub-paragraph, together with time 11:20) and also in its statement of grounds of appeal, that for this reason the patent proprietors, instead of waiting for guidance from the board, could and should have filed this request at an earlier stage of the proceedings. Therefore, there was no reason that would justify the admission of the late filed request into the proceedings.

4.2 The board first notes that the opponent had already objected in its statement of grounds of appeal (section "caractéristique 1d" on pages 6/15 to 8/15, and in particular page 7/15, third paragraph) that claim 1 of Auxiliary Request 4B required that each load sensor comprised "a strain element (23)", that in the earlier application as filed (paragraph [0056] and Fig. 4A to 4D) this strain element was labelled "23a" and was disclosed as being inextricably linked with the plates 22 and 24 supporting the strain element, with the strain sensor or gage 23b attached to the strain element, and with the structure of the assembly, and that the omission of these features, and in particular the omission of the essential feature constituted by the strain sensor or "jauge de contrainte" 23b (statement of grounds of appeal, page 7/15, third paragraph, last sentence), constituted an unallowable intermediate generalisation of the content of the earlier application as filed.

In addition, in the communication annexed to the summons to the oral proceedings (point 2.2.4 of the communication), the board presented a preliminary assessment of the mentioned opponent's objection and noted that, while there appeared to be no reason to conclude that the skilled person would have understood that the claimed load sensors each comprising a strain element would necessarily be structurally configured as disclosed in detail in paragraphs [0055] and [0056] of the earlier application as filed with reference to Fig. 4A to 4D (communication, point 2.2.4, second paragraph), the parent application did not appear to generally disclose load sensors comprising a strain element, but only load sensors comprising a load cell of the strain-gage type operating with a strain element, and that for this reason the claimed subject-matter appeared to constitute an unallowable intermediate generalisation of the content of the earlier application as filed.

It follows from the above considerations that the board, in its preliminary assessment of the opponent's objection, considered that, while some of the elements of the objection (omission in the claim of the plates 22 and 24 and of details of the structure of the assembly) did not appear persuasive, the element of the objection relating to the omission in the claim of the strain sensor or gage 23b attached to the strain element might be considered to be well founded in as much as the claim did not require that the load sensor comprised a load cell of the strain-gage type. Therefore, no new element was introduced in the objection expressed by the board in its preliminary assessment of the opponent's objection, and the objection did not constitute - contrary to the patent proprietors' submissions - a new objection or a new issue that would have constituted an exceptional circumstance justified with cogent reasons within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

It is also noted that the patent proprietors did not avail themselves of the possibility of filing in due time any auxiliary request in reply to the opponent's objection mentioned above, and that similar comments to those already made in point 3.3.2 also apply in respect of the filing of auxiliary request 2.

4.3 Since there were no exceptional circumstances which were justified with cogent reasons by the patent proprietors in support of the admission of the amendments to claim 1 of auxiliary request 2, the board exercised its discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 and decided not to admit auxiliary request 2 into the appeal proceedings.

5. Auxiliary request 3 - Admittance under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020

5.1 The claims of auxiliary request 3 were also filed with the letter dated 4 June 2021.

Thus, pursuant to Article 25(1) and (3) RPBA 2020, Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 applies to the question of whether to admit auxiliary request 3, which was filed after notification of the summons to oral proceedings and is therefore an amendment within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

Claim 1 of this request differs from claim 1 of Auxiliary Request 4B, inter alia, in that the claim further requires that "the weight measuring apparatus is configured to provide the calibration data (Fig. 9) to the game apparatus".

The patent proprietors argued that the amendment was a reaction to the new objection raised by the board in the communication annexed to the summons, according to which it was not clear what the technical functional relationship was between the calibration data and the remaining features of the claimed apparatus (Article 84 EPC). For this reason, the amended claims were to be admitted into the proceedings under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

The opponent submitted that the amended feature gave rise to new objections under Article 76(1) EPC and also to new objections of lack of clarity and of lack of support in the description (Article 84 EPC), and that for this reason the amended claims should not be admitted into the proceedings pursuant to Article 13(1) RPBA 2020. In particular, claim 1 left open how the calibration data was transmitted to the game apparatus, and it was not clear whether the calibration data was transmitted to the game apparatus through the claimed connection means or by some other means (Article 84 EPC).

5.2 The board notes that, on the one hand, the amended feature of claim 1 under consideration was inserted in the claim in reply to the objection of lack of clarity of claim 1 of Auxiliary Request 4B raised for the first time by the board in its communication annexed to the summons, and that this can be seen as a cogent justification by the party why the circumstances are exceptional. If such circumstances are shown to exist, the board of appeal may, in exercising its discretion, decide to admit an amendment made to the appeal case at this advanced stage of the proceedings (see Supplementary publication 2, OJ EPO 2020, explanatory remarks on Article 13(2), third paragraph, last sentence).

On the other hand, when exercising its discretion in accordance with Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 and deciding whether to admit an amendment made at the third level of the convergent approach, the board is free to use or not use the criteria applicable at the second level of the convergent approach, i.e. as set out in Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 (see Supplementary publication 2, OJ EPO 2020, explanatory remarks on Article 13(2), fourth paragraph; and for example decisions T 989/15, point 16.2 of the Reasons, and T 954/17, point 3.10 of the Reasons).

According to Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 and the explanatory remarks on Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 (see Supplementary publication 2, OJ EPO 2020), the onus is on the patent proprietors to demonstrate both why the amendment overcomes the issues raised by the board and why the amendment, prima facie, does not give rise to new objections.

As submitted by the opponent, the amended feature under consideration, prima facie, renders claim 1 unclear in respect of the way the claimed apparatus transmits the calibration data to the game apparatus, and in particular raises the question of whether the claimed apparatus is configured to transmit the calibration data to the game apparatus through the claimed connecting means or by some other alternative means not specified in the claim (Article 84 EPC).

Therefore, the amendments introduced into claim 1, prima facie, give rise to new objections.

5.3 In view of these considerations, the board, in the exercise of its discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA2020, decided not to admit auxiliary request 3 into the appeal proceedings.

6. Auxiliary request 4 - Admittance under Article 13(1) RPBA 2020

6.1 The claims of auxiliary request 4 were submitted during the oral proceedings before the board.

Thus, pursuant to Article 25(1) and (3) RPBA 2020, Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 applies to the question of whether to admit auxiliary request 4, which was filed after notification of the summons to oral proceedings and is therefore an amendment within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 has been amended, inter alia, by specifying that the calibration data for each of the load sensors is "obtained by the sequential application of loads having different weights to the corresponding sensor".

The opponent submitted that the amended claims should not be admitted into the proceedings pursuant to Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 because the amendments gave rise to new objections under Articles 76(1) and 84 EPC. In particular, the opponent submitted that the "sequential application of loads having different weights to the corresponding sensor" specified in claim 1 was not clear and that the claim did not require that the calibration data was obtained by the application of the loads to each of the load sensors independently of each other, but included, in contrast to the corresponding disclosure in the description of the patent specification (Fig. 2 and the corresponding description), the possibility of a co-application of loads to the load sensors (Article 84 EPC).

The patent proprietors submitted that the amendments introduced into claim 1 overcame all the objections addressed by the board in the communication annexed to the summons, and that the claim was clear. In particular, it was clear in claim 1 that the loads were sequentially applied to the corresponding load sensor, i.e. for each of them and therefore independently of each other.

6.2 As set out above, one of the criteria applicable at the second level of the convergent approach, i.e. as set out in Article 13(1) RPBA 2020, is that the patent proprietors have demonstrated why the amendment, prima facie, does not give rise to new objections. The board adheres to the opponent's view that the claimed feature "sequential application of loads having different weights to the corresponding sensor", prima facie, is ambiguous and therefore not clear (Article 84 EPC) because it can be interpreted as the repeated application of loads disclosed in the description of the earlier application as filed and mentioned in point 2.2.2 above and also in the corresponding passages of the description of the patent specification, but also in the sense that a first load is applied to a first one of the load sensors, a second different load is then applied to a second one of the load sensor, etc.. In addition, as a consequence of the formulation of the feature under consideration, doubts arise as to whether the claim is supported by the description within the meaning of Article 84 EPC because according to the description the calibration data is obtained for the different load sensors independently of each other (Fig. 2 together with the corresponding description, and paragraphs [0077] to [0084]) and the mentioned claimed feature does not exclude the co-application of different loads to the load cells as submitted by the opponent.

Therefore, the amendments introduced into claim 1, prima facie, give rise to new objections.

6.3 In view of these considerations, the board, in the exercise of its discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, decided not to admit auxiliary request 4 into the appeal proceedings.

7. The board concludes that none of the patent proprietors' requests is allowable. The patent must therefore be revoked (Article 101(3)(b) EPC).

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility