Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 1071/17 30-01-2020
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 1071/17 30-01-2020

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T107117.20200130
Date of decision
30 January 2020
Case number
T 1071/17
Petition for review of
-
Application number
11774024.1
IPC class
B29C49/00
B29K105/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 420.14 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Process for producing injection stretch blow molded polyolefin containers

Applicant name
Basell Poliolefine Italia S.r.l.
Opponent name
Chemische Fabrik Budenheim K.G.
Board
3.2.05
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention 123(2) (2007)
European Patent Convention 056 (2007)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 012(4) (2007)
Keywords

Amendments - added subject-matter (main request

Amendments - no)

Inventive step (main request

Inventive step - no, auxiliary request III

Inventive step - yes)

Reformatio in peius (auxiliary requests I and II - yes)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0003/89
G 0011/91
G 0009/92
G 0002/10
Citing decisions
-

I. The opponent lodged an appeal against the interlocutory decision of the opposition division on the version in which European patent no. 2 632 689 meets the requirements of the European Patent Convention.

II. During the opposition proceedings, the opponent had raised the grounds for opposition according to Article 100(a) EPC in conjunction with Articles 54 and 56 EPC (lack of novelty and lack of inventive step).

III. Oral proceedings were held before the board of appeal on 30 January 2020.

IV. The appellant (opponent) requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.

V. The respondent (patent proprietor) requested that the appeal be dismissed. In the alternative, it requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained on the basis of the claims according to any of auxiliary requests I, II or III, all filed on 21 November 2017 together with the reply to the statement setting out the grounds of appeal.

VI. The documents referred to in the appeal proceedings included the following:

E1: WO 2005/052049 A1

E2: WO 2006/018777 A1

E5: WO 2010/009832 A2

E11: Technical data sheet "Budit LM 16", Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG, Budenheim, October 2008

E12: Safety data sheet "Iriotec", Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, 30 April 2015

E13: Safety data sheet "Copper(II) hydroxide phosphate", Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, 8 April 2013

E15: Material safety data sheet "Copper(II) phosphate", Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill (MA), 16 June 2009

E16: Excerpt from "Product Range", Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG

VII. Claim 1 according to the main request reads as follows:

"Injection stretch blow molding process for preparing polyolefin containers, comprising the following steps:

1) preparing a preform by injection molding a polyolefin composition comprising a polymer (A) selected from ethylene polymers, propylene polymers and mixtures thereof, and a heat absorber (B);

2) supplying heat to reheat the preform prepared in step 1) and stretch blow molding said preform; characterized in that the heat absorber (B) is Cu2(OH)PO4."

VIII. Compared to the main request, claim 1 of auxiliary request I is amended as follows:

"Injection stretch blow molding process for preparing polyolefin containers, comprising the following steps:

1) preparing a preform by injection molding a polyolefin composition comprising an ethylene homopolymer or copolymer having density equal to or greater than 0.945 g/cm**(3) [deleted: a polymer (A) selected from ethylene polymers, propylene polymers and mixtures thereof], and a heat absorber (B);

2) supplying heat to reheat the preform prepared in step 1) and stretch blow molding said preform; characterized in that the heat absorber (B) is [deleted: Cu]2[deleted: (OH)PO]4 a copper hydroxide phosphate."

IX. In comparison with the main request, claim 1 of auxiliary request II is amended as follows:

"Injection stretch blow molding process for preparing polyolefin containers, comprising the following steps:

1) preparing a preform by injection molding a polyolefin composition comprising an ethylene homopolymer or copolymer having density equal to or greater than 0.945 g/cm**(3)and having F/E ratio values equal to or greater than 60 [deleted: a polymer (A) selected from ethylene polymers, propylene polymers and mixtures thereof], and a heat absorber (B);

2) supplying heat to reheat the preform prepared in step 1) and stretch blow molding said preform; characterized in that the heat absorber (B) is [deleted: Cu]2[deleted: (OH)PO]4 a copper hydroxide phosphate."

X. Compared to the main request, claim 1 of auxiliary request III is amended as follows:

"Injection stretch blow molding process for preparing polyolefin containers, comprising the following steps:

1) preparing a preform by injection molding a polyolefin composition comprising an ethylene homopolymer or copolymer having density equal to or greater than 0.945 g/cm**(3)**()[deleted: a polymer (A) selected from ethylene polymers, propylene polymers and mixtures thereof], and a heat absorber (B);

2) supplying heat to reheat the preform prepared in step 1) and stretch blow molding said preform; characterized in that the heat absorber (B) is Cu2(OH)PO4."

XI. The arguments of the appellant in the written and oral proceedings can be summarised as follows:

Main request, added subject-matter

The fact that the feature of claim 1 defining that the heat absorber (B) was Cu2(OH)PO4 did not make any reference to the specific product trademark "Budit LM16" was contrary to the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC. In the original application as filed it was not directly and unambiguously disclosed that this reference could be omitted. Rather, it required some considerations by the skilled person to realise that any Cu2(OH)PO4 could be used in the process of claim 1. In fact, as could be seen from documents E11, E12 and E13, Cu2(OH)PO4 sold under the name of "Budit LM16" differed from other Cu2(OH)PO4 products in its particle size distribution and purity, both of which had an important influence on the heat absorption properties relevant for the present invention. Moreover, documents E15 and E16 showed that, at the relevant date, not only Cu2(OH)PO4 but all three copper compounds mentioned on page 2 of the application as filed were commercially available, inter alia, from Budenheim. Finally, it was noted that also for examples 1 and 2 given in the patent application Cu2(OH)PO4 of the "Budit LM16"-type was used (see page 8 of the original application). In view of that, and according to the established case law of the boards of appeal, generalising this specific teaching to any Cu2(OH)PO4 product constituted an intermediate generalisation which went beyond what was directly and unambiguously disclosed in the application as filed.

Main request, inventive step

Document E2 was the closest prior art from which the subject-matter of claim 1 differed in that Cu2(OH)PO4 was used as heat absorber instead of carbon black. The problem solved by this difference resided in avoiding a dark coloration of the final articles (see contested patent, paragraph [0007]). The further advantages of an improved wall thickness distribution and a wider processing window constituted bonus effects. The claimed solution of using Cu2(0H)PO4 as heat absorber instead of carbon black and its advantages (very good heat absorption properties, preventing coloration of the moulded articles) was generally known from the prior art. In particular, document E1 (see page 2, lines 7 to 14 and 15 to 19, example 4 and Figure 2) disclosed that an heat absorber of the Mex(PO4)y(OH)z-type had outstanding heat absorption properties (thereby also allowing for a more energy efficient heating of the preforms) and avoided a dark coloration of the moulded articles (see E1, page 3, lines 1 to 12). Among the Mex(PO4)y(OH)z-type heat absorbers, Cu2(OH)PO4 was presented as the preferred choice (see E1, page 4, first paragraph and claim 5). In fact, all examples in document E1 were directed to Cu2(OH)PO4. This was a clear hint pointing the skilled person to the claimed solution. Moreover, document E1 (see page 3, lines 13 to 19 and claims 2 and 3) contained a list of polymers, including polyethylene and polypropylene, for which Cu2(OH)PO4 could be used as an heat absorber; this teaching was not altered by example 4, where Cu2(OH)PO4 was combined with PET for establishing the material properties in a standardised set-up. The fact that polypropylene had a particularly low heat absorption when compared to PET (see document E2, page 1, third paragraph) provided a further incentive for choosing Cu2(OH)PO4 as heat absorbing additive. In view of the teaching of document E1, a combination of documents E2 and E1 would (and not only could) guide the skilled person to the claimed invention.

Auxiliary requests I and II, admissibility

Compared with the request considered allowable by the opposition division, the last feature of claim 1 of the respondent's auxiliary requests I and II was generalised from "the heat absorber (B) is Cu2(OH)PO4" to "the heat absorber (B) is a copper hydroxide phosphate". This was contrary the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius. Therefore, auxiliary requests I and II were inadmissible.

Auxiliary request III, admission

Auxiliary request III should not be admitted into the appeal proceedings. According the jurisprudence of the boards of appeal, convergence was a requirement for admitting amended claim requests into the appeal proceedings. This condition was not met for auxiliary request III.

Auxiliary request III, inventive step

Document E1 related to injection stretch blow moulding of PET bottles (see E1, page 1, third paragraph) and represented the closest prior art for the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request III. The claimed subject-matter differed from document E1 only in that the polymer was specified as comprising an ethylene homopolymer or copolymer having a density equal to or greater than 0.945 g/cm**(3). Since polyethylene was both lighter and cheaper than the PET material used in document E1, the objective technical problem to be solved was to provide an injection stretch blow moulding process for producing containers having a reduced density and lower costs. The claimed solution was rendered obvious by document E5, which also belonged to the technical field of injection stretch blow moulding. In particular, document E5 discussed the disadvantages of using PET and PP for blow moulded containers in terms of recycling (see E5, page 1, line 32 to page 2, line 8) and wall thickness distribution (see E5, page 2, lines 17 to 22) and proposed a two-step injection blow moulding process using HDPE (see E5, page 3, lines 16 to 24) in order to reduce the weight of the moulded containers (see E5, page 4, lines 7 to 12) and to improve their recyclability. It was explicitly stated that PET and HDPE were comparable in terms of shrinkage (see E5, page 3, lines 29 to 35) and that the existing injection moulds for PET preforms could also be used for HDPE (see E5, page 3, lines 35 and 36). Changing the plastic material did thus not require any investment in new moulding equipment. Consequently, document E5 motivated the skilled person to replace the PET material used in the process of document E1 with HDPE without having to expect any difficulties. The additive Cu2(OH)PO4 used in the process of document E1 could be generally utilised as heat absorber independently of the type of polymer. The skilled person would therefore naturally combine it with the HDPE material proposed in document E5. For these reasons, the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request III was rendered obvious by a combination of documents E1 and E5.

XII. The respondent's written and oral submissions may be summarised as follows:

Main request, added subject-matter

The penultimate paragraph on page 2 of the application as filed listed three specific examples of an heat absorber and identified these chemical compounds by their respective CAS number. Further, the paragraph stated that one of these compounds, namely Cu2(OH)PO4, was sold by Budenheim under the trademark of "Budit LM16". The reader of the text was hence informed that one of these compounds was commercially available and one source for this compound was identified. Contrary to the appellant's assertions, this paragraph did not give the impression that the specific example was the product sold under the tradename "Budit LM16". The paragraph in question listed three chemical compounds and complemented the information with a purchase option for one of them. Accordingly, the amendment of claim 1 was directly and unambiguously derivable from the application as originally filed and did thus not introduce subject-matter which extended beyond the original content of the application.

Main request, inventive step

Document E2 represented the closest prior art, from which the subject-matter of claim 1 differed in that Cu2(OH)PO4 was used as an heat absorber. The objective technical problem was to find a process for producing polyolefin containers by an injection stretch blow moulding process in which the obtained containers had reduced variations in the wall thickness in combination with a large processing window, of course without having a dark coloration of the final articles. Documents E1 would not have prompted the skilled person to modify the disclosure of document E2 in a way to arrive at the subject-matter of claim 1, in the expectation of obtaining an improved injection stretch blow moulding process for ethylene polymers, propylene polymers or mixtures thereof which gave a better wall thickness distribution and had a wider processing window. Document E1 disclosed in its introductory portion that PET bottles could be prepared in an injection stretch blow moulding process. However, document E1 was silent on the wall thickness distribution, energy consumption and processing window, even for the PET process. In view of that, document E1 could clearly not point the skilled person to using Cu2(OH)PO4 as an heat absorber in ethylene polymers, propylene polymers or mixtures thereof. Moreover, the examples did not relate to injection stretch blow moulding. Example 4 of document E1 was directed to small plates prepared by injection moulding. Hence, a combination of documents E2 and E1 would not render obvious the subject-matter of claim 1.

Auxiliary requests I and II, admissibility

The respondent did not wish to comment on the appellant's objection of a violation of the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius.

Auxiliary request III, inventive step

Document E5 was a reasonable starting point for examining the question of inventive step. Injection stretch blow moulding was customarily done with PET or PP, while processing HDPE in injection stretch blow moulding was difficult. Document E5 indicated a possibility of performing injection stretch blow moulding with a specific HDPE composition. This prior art teaching was reflected in comparative example 1 of the patent in suit (see Table 1 in paragraph [0058]) and had the disadvantage of a high scrap rate, i.e. a high percentage of defective bottles. The problem to be solved by the present invention thus was to improve the processing window and the cost effectiveness of injection blow moulding of HDPE containers. The claimed solution resided in adding Cu2(OH)PO4 as an heat absorber to the HDPE polymer. Document E5 did not contain any indication to that effect. Therefore, a combination of documents E1 and E5 could not render obvious the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request III.

1. Main request, added subject-matter

1.1 Regarding the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC, the parties' dispute hinges on the question of whether or not the last feature of claim 1 defining that "the heat absorber (B) is Cu2(OH)PO4", which had been added to the claim during the opposition proceedings, extends beyond the content of the patent application as filed.

1.2 The "gold standard" (G 2/10, OJ EPO 2012, 376) for assessing compliance with Article 123(2) EPC requires that any amendment can be made only within the limits of what a skilled person would derive directly and unambiguously, using common general knowledge, and seen objectively and relative to the date of filing, from the whole of these documents as filed (G 3/89, OJ EPO 1993, 117; G 11/91, OJ EPO 1993, 125). The content of the patent application as filed is not limited to what is explicitly stated but includes any teaching which is implicit for the person skilled in the art. The underlying idea is that after the amendment the skilled person must not be presented with new technical information (G 2/10, supra).

1.3 In the present case, an original disclosure relating to the contested amendment can be found at the bottom of page 2 of the description as filed:

"Specific examples of heat absorber (B) are:

dicopper hydroxide phosphate Cu2(OH)PO4, (CAS No. 12158-74-6) sold by Budenheim with the trademark Budit LM16; copper pyrophosphate (CAS No. 10102-90-6); copper phosphate Cu3P208, (CAS No. 7798-23-4)."

Moreover, the dicopper hydroxide phosphate (Cu2(OH)PO4) used for examples 1 and 2 on page 8 of the application as filed is of the "Budit LM16"-type.

1.4 It is observed that on page 2 of the application as filed, all three possible additives are clearly identified by their respective CAS registry number. Only for one of them (dicopper hydroxide phosphate Cu2(OH)PO4) a supplier and a brand name is indicated. Regarding the specific examples given in the patent, it is noted that all examples 1 to 8 are according to the invention and use dicopper hydroxide phosphate Cu2(OH)PO4 as a heat absorber. However, only for examples 1 and 2 "Budit LM16" is indicated as a brand name for Cu2(OH)PO4.

In view of the above, the overall teaching to the skilled person in the application as filed is that the use of Cu2(OH)PO4 as an heat absorbing additive causes the heat to penetrate more evenly and more quickly into the surface of the polyolefin containers. The direct and unambiguous disclosure in the whole of the application as filed is not limited to "Budit LM16" as being the only suitable Cu2(OH)PO4 additive in view of its particle size distribution and purity, as argued by the appellant. Therefore, the introduction of the limitation "the heat absorber (B) is Cu2(OH)PO4" into claim 1 does not go beyond the disclosure in the application as originally filed.

1.5 For these reasons, the board concludes that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request meets the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC.

2. Main request, inventive step

2.1 Both parties use document E2 as a starting point for discussing inventive step. It is common ground between the parties that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request differs from document E2 in that Cu2(OH)PO4 is used as an heat absorber instead of carbon black.

2.2 Regarding the technical effect of this difference, both parties agree that the use of carbon black as an heat absorber has the disadvantage of easily imparting a dark coloration to the final articles (see paragraph [0007] of the patent) and that this drawback is avoided if Cu2(OH)PO4 is used as an heat absorber instead of carbon black. Moreover, as pointed out by the respondent, the contested patent (see paragraph [0009] of the patent) presents an improved wall thickness distribution of the moulded bottles (leading to a higher top load), a higher energy efficiency during the step of reheating the preforms during the injection stretch blow moulding process, and a larger processing window as further advantages of selecting specific metal compounds (such as Cu2(OH)PO4) as heat absorbers.

2.3 The appellant base their inventive step attack on the technical effect of avoiding a dark coloration of the final articles; the further alleged advantages (improved wall thickness distribution of the moulded bottles, larger processing window) are considered as mere bonus effects.

According to the established case law of the Boards of Appeal (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office, 9**(th) edition July 2019, I.D.10.8.), an additional effect achieved inevitably by the skilled person on the basis of an obvious measure without any effort on their part represents a bonus which can normally not substantiate inventive step, even as a surprising effect. In view of this principle, the board considers it appropriate to examine the merits of the appellant's inventive step objections on the basis of the technical effect of avoiding a dark coloration, which is brought forward by both parties and which the appellant puts particular emphasis on.

Therefore, the objective technical problem to be solved can be seen in avoiding a dark coloration of the final articles.

2.4 Regarding the obviousness of the claimed solution, the appellant refers, inter alia, to document E1, which is directed to thermoplastic materials with high infrared absorption. In its introductory portion (see E1, pages 1 and 2), the document refers to PET bottles, made in particular by injection stretch blow moulding, containing, inter alia, carbon black as heat absorber. The latter has the disadvantage of imparting a dark coloration to the final articles (see E1, page 2, second paragraph). In order to avoid this drawback, document E1 proposes to use a Mex(PO4)y(OH)z-type heat absorber which does not noticeably impair the polymer's transparency (see E1, page 3, first paragraph). All examples of document E1 relate to Cu2(OH)PO4 as heat absorber. In example 4, the energy absorption of injection moulded PET parts with either Cu2(OH)PO4 or carbon black as heat absorbers are tested and compared. As shown in Figure 2, PET parts with Cu2(OH)PO4 have a higher absorption in the infrared spectrum than those with carbon black, while having a lower absorption (and thus a higher transparency) in the visible spectrum (see E1, Figure 2 and page 7, last paragraph). It is also noted that the list of possible polymers in document E1 includes not only PET but also polyethylene and polypropylene (see E1, page 3, second paragraph). Starting from the process of injection stretch blow moulding polypropylene bottles with carbon black of document E2, document E1 therefore points the skilled person to the claimed solution of selecting Cu2(OH)PO4 as heat absorber for the polypropylene material and the process of document E2.

2.5 For the sake of completeness, the board adds that it would arrive at the same conclusion if the inventive step assessment were based on the objective technical problem proposed by the respondent, i.e. finding a process for producing polyolefin containers by an injection stretch blow moulding process in which the obtained containers had reduced variations in the wall thickness in combination with a large processing window, of course without having a dark coloration of the final articles. In fact, document E1 (see E1, Figure 2 and page 7, last paragraph) not only teaches that using Cu2(OH)PO4 as heat absorbing additive instead of carbon black reduces the coloration of the plastic material, as explained above under point 2.4, but also that it causes a higher absorption in the infrared spectrum, i.e. a higher energy absorption. This inevitably leads to a more uniform heating of the preforms and, in turn, to an improved wall thickness distribution of the moulded bottles and a larger processing window for the moulding process. Also against this backdrop, document E1 points the skilled person to the claimed solution of selecting Cu2(OH)PO4 as heat absorber in the process of document E2.

2.6 For these reasons, the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request is not based on an inventive step (Articles 52(1) and 56 EPC).

3. Auxiliary requests I and II, admissibility

3.1 If the opponent is the sole appellant against an interlocutory decision by an opposition division maintaining the patent in amended form, the patent proprietor as respondent is primarily restricted in the appeal proceedings to defending the patent as thus maintained in order to comply with the principle of prohibition of reformation in peius (see G 9/92, OJ EPO 1994, 875). Amendments proposed by the patent proprietor (as party to the proceedings as of right under Article 107 EPC, second sentence) may be rejected by the board as inadmissible if they are neither appropriate nor necessary (see G 9/92, supra, headnote II).

3.2 In the present case, claim 1 of auxiliary requests I and II broadens the specification of the heat absorber from Cu2(OH)PO4 (as defined in the version of claim 1 considered allowable by the opposition division) to copper hydroxide phosphate in general. This amendment of claim 1 according to auxiliary requests I and II is neither appropriate nor necessary for defending the version in which the contested patent was maintained by the opposition division. It therefore violates the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius.

3.3 It follows that amended auxiliary requests I and II have to be rejected as inadmissible in accordance with decision G 9/92 (supra).

4. Auxiliary request III, admission

4.1 Auxiliary request III submitted together with the reply to the statement setting out the grounds of appeal corresponds to auxiliary request III filed during the opposition proceedings. The appellant argues that this request should not be admitted into the appeal proceedings since it was not convergent with auxiliary request II.

4.2 According to the transitional provisions of Article 25(2) RPBA 2020, Article 12(4) RPBA 2007 applies to the question of admission of auxiliary request III. However, the provisions of Article 12(4) RPBA 2007 do not give the board any discretion not to admit a request which was presented in the first instance proceedings (and not considered inadmissible by the department of first instance).

4.3 In view of this, auxiliary request III forms part of, and has thus to be considered in, the present appeal proceedings.

5. Auxiliary request III, inventive step

5.1 Both parties agree that document E1 is a reasonable starting point for assessing the inventive merits of the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request III. The parties also concur that claim 1 differs from document E1 in that the polymer is specified as comprising an ethylene homopolymer or copolymer having a density equal to or greater than 0.945 g/cm**(3).

5.2 The appellant indicates that, based on this differing feature, the objective technical problem to be solved was to provide an injection stretch blow moulding process for producing containers having a reduced density and lower costs.

5.3 Regarding the question of obviousness of the claimed subject-matter, the appellant relies on document E5. They argue that this prior art already used an ethylene homopolymer or copolymer having a density equal to or greater than 0.945 g/cm**(3) in an injection stretch blow moulding process, which would render obvious the claimed solution. However, the board observes that, even if one were to follow this argument, there is no reason apparent from the cited documents why the skilled person would then deviate from the teaching of document E5 and add to the suggested HDPE composition of document E5 Cu2(OH)PO4 as an additive. Document E1 specifically discloses Cu2(OH)PO4 in combination with PET (see example 4). The fact that this document (see E1, page 3, second paragraph) also contains a list of polymers including polyethylene in general, for which metal phosphates of the Mex(PO4)y(OH)z-type could be used as additives, does not constitute a teaching to combine Cu2(OH)PO4 with an ethylene homopolymer or copolymer having a density equal to or greater than 0.945 g/cm**(3) in the injection stretch blow moulding process of document E5. Consequently, starting from document E1 the board is not persuaded that document E5 would, without hindsight, render obvious the subject-matter of claim 1.

5.4 In view of these considerations, the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request III is based on an inventive step in the sense of Article 56 EPC.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the department of first instance with the order to maintain the patent with the following claims and a description to be adapted thereto:

Claims No. 1 to 6 according to auxiliary request III filed on 21 November 2017 with the reply to the statement setting out the grounds of appeal.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility