Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 1254/17 01-12-2021
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 1254/17 01-12-2021

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2021:T125417.20211201
Date of decision
01 December 2021
Case number
T 1254/17
Petition for review of
-
Application number
09785490.5
IPC class
E21B 19/00
F16L 11/08
F16L 11/133
E21B 17/01
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 396.9 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

FLEXIBLE PIPE

Applicant name
GE Oil & Gas UK Limited
Opponent name
Technip France
Board
3.2.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 84
Keywords

Claims - clarity (no)

Claims - unclear characterization by parameters

General principles - prohibition of reformatio in peius

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0009/92
G 0001/99
Citing decisions
-

I. By decision posted on 21 March 2017 the opposition division decided that European patent No. 2337923 as per auxiliary request 2dD then on file, and the invention to which it related, met the requirements of the EPC.

II. The opponent (appellant) lodged an appeal against that decision in the prescribed form and within the prescribed time limit.

The patent proprietor (respondent) that had initially also lodged an appeal against said decision withdrew its appeal by letter dated 22 April 2021.

III. Oral proceedings before the Board were held on 1 December 2021.

As announced by letter dated 17 November 2021 the respondent did not attend these oral proceedings, despite being duly summoned. In accordance with the provisions of Rule 115(2) EPC and Article 15(3) RPBA, the proceedings were continued without it.

For further details of this, in particular the issues discussed with the party present and the parties' initial requests, reference is made to the minutes of the oral proceedings.

IV. At the end of the oral proceedings the parties' requests were as follows:

(a) The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that European patent No. 2337923 be revoked.

(b) The respondent requested that the patent be maintained "on the basis of the claims filed with the written submissions" (letter of 17 November 2021).

As summarised in the Board's communication dated 22 February 2021 (point 4), the requests filed in writing were as follows:

that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained on the basis of the main request, or alternatively on the basis of one of auxiliary requests 1 to 4, 4' and 5 to 11 or 1A to 4A, 4A' and 5 to 11A, all filed by letter of 14 December 2017.

V. The relevant claims

The relevant claims of the requests on file are set out below in the order that they are dealt with in the decision; specifically, auxiliary request 11 (which corresponds to auxiliary request 2dD, on the basis of which the opposition division maintained the patent) is quoted first, followed by the remaining requests on file.

The method claims of all the requests have not played a role in the present decision.

VI. Auxiliary request 11

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 11 reads as follows (amendments compared with claim 1 as granted have been underlined, omissions have been indicated by strike-through, and the feature that is relevant for the clarity objection has been marked in bold and italics):

"A riser [deleted: or jumper] assembly for transporting production, exportation or injection fluids from a source location to a target location, comprising:

a first segment of flexible pipe comprising a portion of flexible pipe body (46) and a first and second end fitting (45,48);

a further segment of flexible pipe comprising a portion of flexible pipe body (57) and a first and second end fitting (56, 58); characterised by:

an intermediate segment of flexible pipe comprising a portion of flexible pipe body and a first and second end fitting (50, 52) and at least one buoyancy element (55) the first and second end fittings terminating respective first and second ends of the portion of flexible pipe body of the intermediate segment and a first and second bend stiffener each secured to a respective end fitting of the intermediate segment and wherein each of the first, further and intermediate segments of flexible pipe has an innermost carcass layer (11) which provides an interlocked metallic construction, internal pressure sheath (12) which acts as a fluid retaining layer and comprises a polymer layer that ensures internal fluid integrity, a pressure armour layer (13) formed over the internal pressure sheath and is a structural layer with a layup angle close to 90° that increases the resistance of the flexible pipe to internal and external pressure and mechanical crushing loads, an outer sheath (17) which comprises a polymer layer used to protect the pipe against penetration of seawater, corrosion, abrasion and mechanical damage and wherein the at least one buoyancy element is confined on the intermediate segment between the bend stiffeners which provide buoyancy stoppers in the event of buoyancy clamp failure."

VII. Further requests (main request, auxiliary requests 1 to 4, 4' and 5 to 10, and the respective "A" requests, including auxiliary request 11A)

(a) Claim 1 of the main request (corresponding to claim 1 as granted) reads as follows:

"A riser or jumper assembly for transporting production, exportation or injection fluids from a source location to a target location, comprising:

a first segment of flexible pipe comprising a portion of flexible pipe body (46) and a first and second end fitting (45,48);

a further segment of flexible pipe comprising a portion of flexible pipe body (57) and a first and second end fitting (56,58), characterised by:

an intermediate segment of flexible pipe comprising a portion of flexible pipe body and a first and second end fitting (50,52) and at least one buoyancy element (55)."

(b) Auxiliary request 1

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 corresponds to claim 1 as granted, with the following amendment (underlined):

"... and wherein the at least one buoyancy element is confined on the intermediate segment between end fittings which provide buoyancy stoppers in the event of buoyancy clamp failure."

(c) Auxiliary request 2

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 corresponds to claim 1 of auxiliary request 1, with the "jumper alternative" having been removed from the beginning of the claim:

"A riser [deleted: or jumper] assembly for transporting production, ..."

(d) Auxiliary request 3

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 corresponds to claim 1 as granted, with the following amendment (underlined):

"... wherein each of the first, further and intermediate segments of flexible pipe has an optional innermost carcass layer (11), internal pressure sheath (12), a pressure armour layer (13), an outer sheath (17) and wherein the at least one buoyancy element is confined on the intermediate segment between end fittings which provide buoyancy stoppers in the event of buoyancy clamp failure."

(e) Auxiliary request 4

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 corresponds to claim 1 as granted, with the following amendment (underlined):

"... wherein each of the first, further and intermediate segments of flexible pipe has an optional innermost carcass layer (11) which provides an interlocked metallic construction, internal pressure sheath (12) which acts as a fluid retaining layer and typically comprises a polymer layer that ensures internal fluid integrity, a pressure armour layer (13) formed over the internal pressure sheath and is a structural layer with a layup angle close to 90° that increases the resistance of the flexible pipe to internal and external pressure and mechanical crushing loads, an outer sheath (17) which comprises a polymer layer used to protect the pipe against the penetration of seawater, corrosion, abrasion and mechanical damage and wherein the at least one buoyancy element is confined on the intermediate segment between end fittings which provide buoyancy stoppers in the event of buoyancy clamp failure."

(f) Auxiliary request 4'

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4' differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 in that

(i) the "jumper alternative" is deleted

"A riser [deleted: or jumper] assembly for transporting production, ..."

(ii) the terms "... optional innermost carcass layer (11) ..." and "... typically comprises a polymer layer ..." have been replaced with "... [deleted: optional] innermost carcass layer (11) ..." and "... [deleted: typically] comprises a polymer layer ...", respectively.

(g) Auxiliary request 5

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 corresponds to claim 1 as granted, with the following amendment (underlined):

"... and wherein the first and second end fittings terminate respective first and second ends of the portion of the intermediate segment and a first and second bend stiffener each secured to a respective end fitting of the intermediate segment."

(h) Auxiliary request 6

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 6 corresponds to claim 1 of auxiliary request 5, with the "jumper alternative" being removed from the beginning of the claim:

"A riser [deleted: or jumper] assembly for transporting production, ..."

(i) Auxiliary request 7

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 7 corresponds to claim 1 of auxiliary request 5, with the following amendment (the amendment compared with claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 is underlined):

"... and wherein the first and second end fittings terminate respective first and second ends of the portion of the intermediate segment and a first and second bend stiffener each secured to a respective end fitting of the intermediate segment and the at least one buoyancy element is secured at a respective location between the first and second bend stiffeners of the intermediate segment."

(j) Auxiliary request 8

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 8 corresponds to claim 1 of auxiliary request 7, with the "jumper alternative" having been removed from the beginning of the claim:

"A riser [deleted: or jumper] assembly for transporting production, ..."

(k) Auxiliary request 9

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 9 corresponds to claim 1 of the main request, with the following amendment at the end (underlined):

"... wherein the first and second end fittings terminate respective first and second ends of the intermediate segment and a first and second bend stiffener each secured to a respective end fitting of the intermediate segment, and wherein each of the first, further and intermediate segments of flexible pipe has an optional innermost carcass layer (11), internal pressure sheath (12), a pressure armour layer formed over the internal pressure sheath and is a structural layer with a layup angle close to 90° (13), an outer sheath (17) which comprises a polymer layer used to protect the pipe against penetration of seawater, corrosion, abrasion and mechanical damage, and wherein the at least one buoyancy element is confined on the intermediate segment between the first and second bend stiffeners which provide buoyancy stoppers in the event of buoyancy clamp failure."

(l) Auxiliary request 10

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 10 corresponds to claim 1 of the main request, with the following amendment at the end (underlined):

"...wherein the first and second end fittings terminate respective first and second ends of the intermediate segment and a first and second bend stiffener each secured to a respective end fitting of the intermediate segment, and wherein each of the first, further and intermediate segments of flexible pipe has an optional innermost carcass layer (11) which provides an interlocked metallic construction, internal pressure sheath (12) which acts as a fluid retaining layer and typically comprises a polymer layer that ensures internal fluid integrity, a pressure armour layer (13) formed over the internal pressure sheath and is a structural layer with a layup angle close to 90° that increases the resistance of the flexible pipe to internal and external pressure and mechanical crushing loads, an outer sheath (17) which comprises a polymer layer used to protect the pipe against penetration of seawater, corrosion, abrasion and mechanical damage, and wherein the at least one buoyancy element is confined on the intermediate segment between the bend stiffeners which provide buoyancy stoppers in the event of buoyancy clamp failure."

(m) The "A requests" (1A to 4A, 4A' and 5A to 11A)

In each case, the "A request" removes the dependent claim defining the "required buoyancy length" (claim 7 of the main request or its equivalent, which have been renumbered in each case), so as to address the objection of insufficiency of disclosure with respect to that term.

VIII. The appellant's essential arguments can be summarised as follows:

As the proprietor had withdrawn its appeal, the opponent was the only appellant. In such a situation the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius applied, i.e. the proprietor was restricted to defending the patent in the version as granted by the opposition division. Therefore, only auxiliary request 11 was to be considered by the Board.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 11, and auxiliary request 11A, should this request be considered, had been amended by taking a passage from the description. According to G3/14 these amended features had to be examined for clarity. The amendment defined the assembly as comprising an intermediate segment of flexible pipe comprising a pressure armour layer (13) formed over the internal pressure sheath and as being "a structural layer with a layup angle close to 90° that increases the resistance of the flexible pipe to internal and external pressure and mechanical crushing loads...". The term "layup angle close to 90°" did not satisfy the requirements of Article 84 EPC in that the definition was a relative one, without an established meaning in the art. It was thus impossible to know whether or not an assembly having a pressure armour layer exhibiting a layup angle of 75°, 80° or 85° was to be considered part of the claimed subject-matter. While it was true that API specification 17J for unbonded flexible pipes (D13) used identical wording in point 3.1.32 for the definition of pressure armour layers, this did not imply that the term was clear.

As the unclear relative term was found in claim 1 of auxiliary request 11, and auxiliary request 11A, neither request was allowable.

With all the other requests being in violation of the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius, there was no allowable request, meaning that the patent was to be revoked.

IX. The respondent's essential arguments can be summarised as follows:

The term "layup angle close to 90°" was clear. D13, which, even according to the appellant, represented common general knowledge, used exactly the same language in point 3.1.32 as was used in the claims of the requests. It thus had to be the case that the skilled person was able to interpret this phrase in light of the common general knowledge and apply a technically sound interpretation. Accordingly, there was no lack of clarity.

The respondent did not put forward any reasoning regarding the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius.

1. Requests to be considered

1.1 With its decision posted on 21 March 2017 the opposition division had maintained the patent based on auxiliary request 2dD then on file. After the proprietor's appeal was withdrawn (letter dated 22 April 2021), the opponent was the only appellant.

1.2 According to G9/92 (headnote 3), "if the opponent is the sole appellant against an interlocutory decision maintaining a patent in amended form, the patent proprietor is primarily restricted during the appeal proceedings to defending the patent in the form in which it was maintained by the Opposition Division in its interlocutory decision. Amendments proposed by the patent proprietor as a party to the proceedings under Article 107, second sentence, EPC, may be rejected as inadmissible by the Board of Appeal if they are neither appropriate nor necessary".

1.3 As claim 1 of the main request and of each of auxiliary requests 1-4, 4' and 5-10 (including the respective "A requests") is broader than the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 11, which is identical to auxiliary request 2dD, on the basis of which the opposition division decided to maintain the patent, these requests are neither appropriate nor necessary in the sense of the aforementioned decision by the Enlarged Board of Appeal. Only auxiliary request 11A, which, by deleting a dependent claim objected to as insufficiently disclosed, is occasioned by the appeal, can be considered to fulfil the criteria of G9/92.

1.4 The Board thus concludes that, following the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius (G2/92, op. cit.), all the requests except for auxiliary requests 11 and 11A would be inadmissible, unless an exception to the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius were found to be applicable (G1/99, headnote).

1.5 G1/99 (headnote, second sentence) allows for such an exception to the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius in order to meet an objection put forward by the opponent/appellant or the Board during the appeal proceedings, in circumstances where the patent as maintained in amended form would otherwise have to be revoked as a direct consequence of an inadmissible amendment held allowable by the opposition division in its interlocutory decision.

1.6 In light of the above observations, the allowability of auxiliary requests 11 and 11A, which are clearly admissible in application of G9/92, is examined in a first step (point 2 below). Then, in a second step (point 3 below), the further requests (see list in point 1.3 above) are examined to determine whether one of them may exceptionally be allowed to be filed in order to overcome the deficiency in application of decision G1/99.

1.7 In this context it is noted that, although, according to G1/99, the respondent could have been allowed to file (additional) requests in order to overcome the deficiency, it did not file a reply to the appellant's letter dated 29 October 2021 and it was not present at the oral proceedings either, thus having chosen not to respond in any way to the possible implications of the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius invoked by the appellant (op. cit., point (A), pages 1 and 2).

2. Auxiliary requests 11 and 11A - Article 84 EPC

During the opposition proceedings, the assembly defined in claim 1 as granted has been amended to comprise an intermediate segment of flexible pipe comprising a pressure armour layer (13) formed over the internal pressure sheath and being "a structural layer with a layup angle close to 90° that increases the resistance of the flexible pipe to internal and external pressure and mechanical crushing loads...".

This amendment is based on the description (page 4, fourth paragraph of the original application; see also paragraph [0018] of the patent specification). In accordance with G3/14, claim 1 as amended in auxiliary requests 11 and 11A may thus be examined for compliance with the requirements of Article 84 EPC to the extent that the amendment introduces non-compliance with Article 84 EPC.

2.1 The appellant argued that the term "layup angle close to 90°" was a relative definition which did not make it possible to discern what fell under the definition of the subject-matter and what did not.

According to established case law, claims must be clear for the sake of legal certainty, as their purpose is to enable the protection conferred by the patent to be determined (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 9th edition 2019, II, A.1.1). Claims lack clarity if the exact distinctions which delimit the scope of protection cannot be learnt from them.

The Board agrees with the appellant that the term "close to 90°" in the present context does not make it possible to determine upwards of which angle a structural layer layup angle could be considered to be "close to 90°". The term is vague and does not have an unequivocal, generally accepted meaning in the relevant art. It thus follows from the requirement of legal certainty that the definition in claim 1 of auxiliary requests 11 and 11A is not clear.

The opposition division argued that "close to 90°" would be interpreted by the skilled person with respect to the function of the pressure armour layer and, due to this, the angle would be defined as closely as technically possible to 90°; however, the wording "close to 90°" is different from "as closely as technically possible to 90°". While an angle of 90° might be optimal for the function of the pressure armour, there is no indication in the patent or anywhere else in the file that "as closely as technically possible to 90°" was indeed meant. Contrary to expressions like "about", "approximately" or "substantially", which in certain circumstances have an established meaning in claim drafting (see e.g. the Guidelines for Examination 2020, F-IV, 4.7.1), the wording "close to 90°" is vague and undefined and does not allow the invention to be distinguished from the prior art.

This evaluation is not changed by the fact that exactly the same language is used in point 3.1.32 of D13, API specification 17J for unbonded flexible pipes. That passage of the document defines what is to be understood as a "pressure armor layer". Therefore, the term "pressure armor layer" could be accepted as having a clear meaning to the skilled person; however, this does not imply that all the wording used in the definition of the term "pressure armor layer" likewise has to be considered clear.

As correctly argued by the appellant, a definition in a standard document did not have to fulfil the requirements of Article 84 EPC. It is rather unrealistic to assume that each and every word used in the 32-page document D13 has been chosen with the diligence required for clear claim drafting. Moreover, even if it provided an indication that the term "pressure armor layer" itself had an established meaning in the art, this did not imply that the wording used in the definition of the term, namely the expression "close to 90°", was likewise clear.

For the purposes of the standard, the term "pressure armor layer" does indeed need to be defined. In view of all the other features, the reader knows what this term means, even if the definition of the layup angle is relatively vague. In this context it is noted that the definition in point 3.1.32 of D13 comprises further relatively vague features such as "typically consist of" or "may be backed up".

The requirements of clarity are different for a parametric definition in a claim. Here, the purpose is to define the protection conferred. It is thus not sufficient to clearly define what can be considered a "pressure armor layer", but it needs to be clear which angles fall under the feature "close to 90°" of the parametric definition and which do not. This cannot be derived either from the patent specification or from D13. Therefore, the wording "close to 90°" is not clear in the sense of Article 84 EPC, even though it has been used in D13.

2.2 To conclude, auxiliary requests 11 and 11A do not fulfil the requirements of Article 84 EPC.

3. Admissibility of the further requests on file - G1/99

3.1 Auxiliary requests 4, 4', 9 and 10 (and the respective "A requests") comprise the same unclear feature as auxiliary request 11/11A. They are thus not appropriate for defending the patent and therefore cannot justify an exception under G1/99, as they would clearly be unallowable.

3.2 Requests reintroducing the "jumper alternative", which is not part of claim 1 of auxiliary request 11/11A, put the respondent in a worse situation than if it had not appealed. They are not appropriate or necessary for defending the patent in the form in which it was maintained by the opposition division, as the inclusion of the jumper alternative has no causal link with the unclear feature "layup angle close to 90°". This is the case for the main request and auxiliary requests 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9 and 10 (and the respective "A requests"), which are thus not admissible.

3.3 The unclear feature is not found in the remaining requests 2, 6 and 8, meaning that the clarity objection discussed above does not apply; however, together with the unclear feature, various other features have been omitted, thus putting the appellant in a worse situation than if it had not appealed, without there being a causal link between the omitted features and the deficiency to be overcome. The amendments thus exceed what can be considered an equitable effort by the non-appealing proprietor to defend the patent against the clarity objection.

3.4 It should be noted that the three options set out in G1/99 for an exceptional amendment to overcome the deficiency cannot be chosen ad libitum, but need to follow the particular sequence of possibilities for overcoming the deficiency. The first solution for overcoming the deficiency to be considered is to introduce one or more originally disclosed (and clear!) features which limit the scope of the patent as maintained, e.g. the layup angle being 90°. Deleting the inadmissible amendment (e.g. omitting any numerical restriction to the layup angle) would be the third and last option, which is available to the respondent only if the two previous options given in the headnote of G1/99 are not possible.

Without any reasoning from the respondent in this respect, the Board concludes that auxiliary requests 2, 6 and 8 (and the respective "A requests") are also inadmissible.

4. To conclude, all the requests on file are either inadmissible or non-allowable or both. Consequently, the patent has to be revoked.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility