Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t180339eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 0339/18 (Fabric cleaning/Unilever) 02-06-2021
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 0339/18 (Fabric cleaning/Unilever) 02-06-2021

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2021:T033918.20210602
Date of decision
02 June 2021
Case number
T 0339/18
Petition for review of
-
Application number
09765764.7
IPC class
C11D 3/37
C11D 11/00
C11D 3/386
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 445.69 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO FABRIC CLEANING

Applicant name

1) Unilever PLC

2) Unilever N.V.

Opponent name
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Board
3.3.06
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56
European Patent Convention Art 84
European Patent Convention R 80
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13
Keywords

Inventive step - (no)

Inventive step - main request (patent as granted)

Late-filed auxiliary requests - claim requests clearly allowable (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 1286/14
G 0010/91
T 0736/95
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal lies from the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the opposition filed against European patent No. 2 300 586, claims 1 and 2 thereof reading as follows:

"1. A method of laundering fabric which comprises the steps of:

a) providing a pourable liquid detergent composition comprising ethoxylated polyethyleneimine, soil release polymer, 10-40% wt of surfactant, essentially consisting of nonionic and/or anionic and/or zwitterionic surfactant, which 10-40% wt of surfactant preferably passes the Calcium Tolerance Test described herein, and in addition, no more than 15% wt, preferably no more than 10%wt, of a soap, with the proviso that any soap present is present as a minority in wt% terms of the total surfactant, wherein the ratio of non-soap surfactant to ethoxylated polyethyleneimine is from 2:1 to 7:1,

b) diluting a dose of said detergent composition in water by a factor of greater than 500 to obtain a wash liquor which comprises 0.8 to 0.035 g/1 of non-soap surfactant, and,

c) washing fabrics with the wash liquor so formed."

"2. A method of laundering fabric which comprises the steps of:

a) providing a multidose container which contains a pourable liquid detergent composition comprising ethoxylated polyethyleneimine, soil release polymer, 10-40% wt of surfactant, essentially consisting of nonionic and/or anionic and/or zwitterionic surfactant, and in addition, no more than 15% wt, preferably no more than 10%wt, of a soap, with the proviso that any soap present is present as a minority in wt% terms of the total surfactant,

b) mixing a dose of the detergent composition comprising 4 to 8 g non-soap surfactant, at least 0.5 g of soil release polymer and at least 0.5 g of the ethoxylated polyethyleneimine, with water to obtain a wash liquor, wherein the ratio of non-soap surfactant to ethoxylated polyethyleneimine is from 2:1 to 7:1, and

c) washing fabrics with the wash liquor so formed."

II. In the contested decision, the Opposition Division did not admit the late-filed ground for opposition under Article 100(c) EPC, acknowledged novelty over D3 (WO 97/42294 A1) and found that the claimed subject-matter was not obvious over D2 (WO 2006/113314 A1) taken as the closest prior art, even if combined with D16 (WO 2006/113315 A2).

III. With its statement of grounds, the opponent submitted a new document D17 (Liquid Detergents, 2**(nd) Ed., vol. 129, Chapter 8, pp. 290, 2005, edited by K.Y. Lai), maintained its former objections and argued that the Opposition Division had erred at not admitting its new ground for opposition.

IV. With its reply, the respondent/patent proprietors filed amended claims as auxiliary requests 1 to 6, requested to dismiss the appeal and to admit neither D17 nor the late-filed new ground for opposition.

V. In its preliminary opinion, the board saw no reason for admitting the new ground for opposition but held D17 to be admissible. Furthermore it acknowledged novelty over D3 but held obvious the subject-matter of the claims as granted over D2. The board further raised objections under Article 123(2) EPC against the auxiliary requests and concerning inventive step, it drew attention to the combination of D2 with D16.

VI. In response thereto the respondent submitted new auxiliary requests 1 to 5 with letter dated 5 May 2021 and maintained auxiliary request 6.

VII. The appellant requested not to admit the new auxiliary requests.

VIII. At the oral proceedings, which took place on 2 June 2021, inventive step of claim 1 of the main request was discussed taking D2 as the closest prior art, possibly combined with D16 and/or D17. Further the admittance of the auxiliary requests was discussed.

IX. The final requests of the parties were as follows:

The Appellant (Opponent) requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and the patent be revoked, that the new ground of appeal be admitted into the appeal proceedings and that auxiliary requests 1 to 5 not be admitted.

The Respondent (Patent Proprietors) requested that the appeal be dismissed and the patent maintained as granted (main request) or, alternatively, on the basis of one of auxiliary requests 1 to 5 filed with letter dated 5 May 2021 or of auxiliary request 6 filed with letter dated 24 August 2016.

1. Admittance of the new ground under Article 100(c) EPC

1.1 This new ground for opposition was filed with letter of 21 July 2017, i.e. outside the time limit set by Article 99(1) EPC.

1.2 For the board, the Opposition Division correctly found that deciding on its admittance was within its discretion.

1.2.1 In this respect the first instance questioned whether it was prima facie evident that a violation of Article 123(2) EPC was present as the opponent had obviously not noticed it when drafting the notice of opposition, and found that upon taking into account the complete disclosure of the original application, including the examples, it was clear that non-soap surfactants (NSS) were present at a ratio to ethoxylated polyethyleneimine (EPEI) polymers of 2:1 to 7:1, so that the ratio NSS/EPEI of 1:2 to 1:7 disclosed on page 12, lines 13 to 19, of the original application was evidently erroneous, and the obvious rectification was to swap the numerical ratio.

Further, the disclosure on page 12 did not link the amount of the polyethyleneimine (PEI) polymers with the disclosed ratio based on the EPEI, and in any case the amount of PEI was anyhow limited by the amended ratio to a value falling within the originally disclosed range for all PEI polymers. Although granted claim 2 referred to the ratio of NSS to EPEI in step b), i.e. after dilution, as no further actives were added upon dilution in step (b), the claimed ratio present in the wash liquor after dilution was the same as that of the detergent composition in step a) of claim 1. Finally, the subject-matter of either of claims 1 and 2 was not based on multiple selections from different lists, as there was ample support in the original application (e.g. page 38, lines 22 to 25) for compositions comprising additionally a soil release polymer (SRP) together with EPEI polymers.

1.2.2 The Opposition Division thus decided not to admit the late-filed ground for opposition under Article 100(c) EPC into the opposition proceedings in view of its lack of prima facie relevance.

1.3 According to an established principle (Case Law of the boards of Appeal of the EPO, 2019, IV.C.4.5.2) a board will only overrule a first instance discretionary decision if it was taken according to wrong principles, or without taking into account the right principles, or in unreasonable way, and thus exceeding the proper limits of the discretion.

1.4 In this respect, the present case is very similar if not identical (procedurally) to that dealt with in T 1286/14, as the patent proprietor did not consent to the admittance of the late-filed new ground for opposition not admitted by the Opposition Division.

1.4.1 In T 1286/14 the board addressed the limited scope for reviewing exercises of discretion to refuse a "fresh ground for opposition" where the proprietor objects to its admittance on appeal. In the case at issue, the opposition division had considered a late-filed ground irrelevant and refused to admit it. In such circumstances, it was sufficient for the board to establish that there was evidence that the opposition division had actually examined whether the ground was prima facie relevant and given reasons for its finding on this. So, instead of reviewing whether the opposition division had examined such prima facie relevance "correctly" in substance, it merely had to check that such an examination had demonstrably been conducted. In other words, its duty to review the exercise of discretion was limited. The competent board, citing G 10/91 (OJ 1993, 420), thus refrained from examining the substance of the fresh ground, thereby following the approach taken in decisions such as T 736/95 (OJ 2001, 191) and rejecting that entailing a thorough review of the earlier exercise of discretion on its merits, as taken in other decisions mentioned in that section of the case law.

1.5 In the present case, the board follows the rationale of T 1286/14 and takes the view that it is apparent from the decision under appeal that the Opposition Division has actually examined whether the ground was prima facie relevant and given reasons for its finding on this, as summarised above.

Therefore, the board's duty to review the exercise of discretion is limited, and does not extend to reviewing whether the opposition division has examined such non prima facie relevance "correctly" in substance.

1.6 It follows from the foregoing that the new ground for opposition under Article 100(c) EPC cannot be admitted into the appeal proceedings without the consent of the patent proprietor.

2. Admittance of the late filed item of evidence

D17 was filed with the grounds of appeal in reaction to the decision under appeal and evidently concerns common general knowledge in dispute on the role of soil release polymers. Hence, for the board, it is clearly admissible into these appeal proceedings.

3. Main request - Inventive step

3.1 The patent concerns an improved process for laundering fabrics using a concentrated detergent (paragraph [0001]) and addresses ([0011]) the benefits on the environmental footprint of a laundering process that may be obtained by using low dosages of concentrated products of a specific formulation class at high dilution. Further, the fully formulated products according to the invention exhibit better removal of dirt and stains than commercial products which, in use, are dosed at higher surfactant levels.

3.2 D2, that the parties acknowledged at the oral proceedings as representing the closest state of the art, is also acknowledged in the patent in suit ([0009] and [0010]) and relates to liquid detergent compositions having first wash lipase enzymes and modified polyethyleneimine polymers used for improved grease and oil soil cleaning (page 1, first paragraph).

3.2.1 D2 departs from the improved removal of greasy soils that is a constant aim for laundry detergent manufacturers. In spite of the use of many effective surfactants and combinations of surfactants, especially when used at low water temperatures, many surfactant-based products still do not achieve complete removal of greasy/oily soils (page 1, second paragraph). More recently, higher efficiency lipases have been developed that also work effectively during the wash phase of the cleaning process, so that as well as cleaning in the second washing step a significant improvement in cleaning effect due to lipase can be found in the first wash-cycle. Known examples of such enzymes are referred to as first wash lipases (page 1, third paragraph).

According to D2, the problem that faced the inventors was to maximise performance with this new generation of enzymes (page 1, fourth paragraph), and the solution adopted was to combine first wash lipases with modified polyethyleneimine polymers in a liquid detergent composition, thus improving grease and oil cleaning while giving stable liquid detergent compositions (page 1, fourth paragraph) versus commercially available lipase enzymes such as LIPOLASE® (paragraph bridging pages 1 and 2).

3.2.2 The liquid laundry detergent composition used in the method of D2 (see claim 1) comprises inter alia:

(a) from 5 to 20000 LU/g of a first wash lipase (Lipex);

(b) from 0.01 wt% to 10 wt% by weight of the composition of a modified polyethyleneimine polymer comprising a polyethyleneimine backbone of about 300 to about 10000 weight average molecular weight; the modification of the polyethyleneimine backbone being inter alia one or two alkoxylation modifications per nitrogen atom in the polyethyleneimine backbone; and

(c) the balance of the composition comprising a liquid carrier.

3.2.3 According to claim 4, the above composition further comprises

(d) a surfactant system comprising from 5 to 30% by weight of the composition of an ethoxylated C10-C18 alkyl ethoxy sulfate, as well as (page 12, lines 1-4)

(e) from 0 to 7 wt% of a co-surfactant, i.e. further nonionic or anionic surfactants,

so that the NSS amount can range from 5 to 37 wt%.

3.2.4 D2 thus does not literally disclose any generic or specific ratio between NSS and EPEI.

3.2.5 D2 however also discloses (last two paragraphs on page 18) a method of removing soils and stains, in the passage reading: "The compositions of this invention, prepared as hereinbefore described, can be used directly onto fabrics or used to form aqueous washing solutions for use in the laundering of fabrics. Generally, an effective amount of such compositions is added directly to the fabric or directly to water, preferably in a conventional fabric laundering automatic washing machine, to form such aqueous laundering solutions. As used herein "effective amount" refers to an amount providing the desired cleaning benefits of greasy soils and oily soils. The aqueous washing solution so formed is then contacted, preferably under agitation, with the fabrics to be laundered therewith. An effective amount of the liquid detergent compositions herein added fabric is from 0.5 mL to 10 mL of the composition. An effective amount of the liquid detergent composition herein added to water to form aqueous laundering solutions can comprise amounts sufficient to form from about 500 to 7,000 ppm of composition in aqueous washing solution. More preferably, from about 1,000 to 3,000 ppm of the detergent compositions herein will be provided in aqueous washing solution."

3.2.6 The board observes that it is not in dispute that the compositions of Examples A to D of D2 disclose the closest embodiments, with the composition of Example C being the closest in terms of common features with the composition used in the method of claim 1 at issue.

3.2.7 In particular, the exemplified compositions comprise the following components:

C12-15 alkyl ethoxy (1.8) sulfate, (a NSS)

C12-13 ethoxylated (9) alcohol, (a NSS)

C11-12 linear alkyl benzene sulfonate, (a NSS)

C12-14 dimethyl amine oxide;, (a NSS)

C12-18 fatty acid, (a Soap precursor),

PEI(backbone Mw 1600), Ethoxylated (EO20), (a EPEI),

Polymer**(4), (a EPEI), (defined under Table 1 as being of Formula (I) or (II), described at page 8 of D2 under the hearing "Modified Polyethyleneimine Polymer" (starting at page 6). As can be seen from formulae (I) and (II), n refers to the number of ethylene oxide units in the polymer)

3.2.8 Based upon the above definitions, the formulations of Examples A-D of D2 have following (uncontested) contents and ratios of NSS:EPEI.

Example A B C D

NSS(wt%) 16.5 22.48 12.38 11.28

EPEI(wt%) 1.65 1.65 1.49 1.32

NSS:EPEI 10:1 13.6:1 8.3:1 8.5:1

The lowest ratio NSS/EPEI is that of Example C (8.3/1).

3.2.9 The method of claim 1 at issue is thus distinguished from Example C of D2 in that the NSS/EPEI ratio of the composition is from 2:1 to 7:1 and the composition is dosed at the defined dilution ratio range.

3.3 Technical problem underlying the invention

3.3.1 The respondent has formulated the technical problem in the light of D2 as being the provision of a method of laundering fabrics providing improved washing performance across a range of stains, despite lowering the surfactant levels.

3.3.2 This formulation corresponds in essence to the one in the application as filed on which the patent in suit (see [0011], last sentence) was granted, in particular over the closest prior art D2.

3.4 Solution

3.4.1 As to the proposed solution, the patent in suit proposes inter alia the laundering method according to claim 1, which is in particular characterised by said ratio between NSS and EPEI and said dilution factor.

3.5 Success of the solution

3.5.1 The examples of the patent in suit are not conclusive on whether the alleged effect can also be obtained outside the claimed ratio, despite the fact that from the results in Tables 8 and 9, it is apparent that at the lowest ratio of 2:1 the SRI value is highest, and that when going from 2:1 to higher ratio values the RSI value decreases. It is however not clear what happens below 2:1 and above 8:1.

3.5.2 Comparative examples D13 (filed by the patent proprietors) concern compositions with high amounts of both EPEI and soil release polymer. However, in claim 1 at issue, the latter can be present in even small amounts.

3.5.3 As to the dilution factor defined in claim 1, in comparison to values outside the claimed range, the patent proprietors have not shown any advantage, but in the absence of counter-evidence, the board accepts that the technical problem as formulated by the respondent is effectively solved in respect of the claimed NSS/EPEI ratio.

3.6 Obviousness

3.6.1 The question which arises is whether the skilled person starting from D2 and faced with said technical problem would have found any motivation, without the benefit of hindsight, for increasing the EPEI amount in the dosage of the detergent of D2 in the expectation of an improved laundering performance, and whether in doing so he would have arrived at a composition falling within the ambit of Claim 1 at issue.

3.6.2 As regards the examples of D2, in particular example C, they do not disclose the dilution ratio when in use. Moreover, the composition of example C has a NSS/EPEI ratio higher (about 8:1) than the claimed ratio of up to 7:1.

3.6.3 With respect to the dilution ratio, D2 discloses a method of removing soils and stains (last paragraph on page 18) as follows: "An effective amount of the liquid detergent composition herein added to water to form aqueous laundering solutions can comprise amounts sufficient to form from about 500 to 7,000 ppm of composition in aqueous washing solution. More preferably, from about 1,000 to 3,000 ppm of the detergent compositions herein will be provided in aqueous washing solution."

The patent in suit ([0010]) itself acknowledges that a Non-Soap Surfactant (NSS) content of 11 to 21 wt.%, as disclosed in the examples of D2, provides a preferred wash solution non-soap surfactant concentration of from 0,1 to 0,6 g/l (i.e. a dilution factor as defined in claim 1).

Thus, in the method of laundering fabrics disclosed by D2, the dilution ratio range used for e.g. composition C falls within or at least overlaps with that defined in claim 1 at issue.

The argument of the respondent that D2 does not make clear whether the compositions illustrated in its examples are applied directly to the fabric or diluted does not convince, because the compositions of the examples of D2 are clearly applicable in diluted form with the stated dilution ratio.

3.6.4 In respect of the distinguishing lower NSS/EPEI ratio as claimed, the board remarks that the patent in suit [0010] (sentence bridging pages 2 and 3) acknowledges that "although the general disclosure of D2 allows for high levels of EPEI, the actual levels (i.e. those specifically disclosed in the examples thereof) used are too low to realise the benefit from the low dose of surfactant to the wash from a low volume dose of the composition".

The board further notes that the amount of NSS in the examples of D2, in particular in Composition C (about 12 wt.-%), is far away from the most preferred maximum of D2 whilst the amount of EPEI (1.49) is at about the minimum of the range disclosed in D2, and at about the middle part of the most preferred range disclosed by D2 (up to 3 wt.-%).

In fact, D2 (e.g. claim 1) teaches that the level of EPEI can be as high as 10 wt% (which, if compared to the maximum of NSS of 37 wt%, implicitly results in a ratio NSS/EPEI as claimed).

D2 (page 1, first three lines and last full paragraph; paragraph bridging pages 1 and 2) moreover teaches that the use of modified polyethyleneimine (in D2 the most preferred and only one exemplified modified poythyleneimine is ethoxylated polyethylene imine) in combination with lipase enzymes in a liquid detergent composition gives rise to:

- improved grease and oil cleaning results; and

- an acceptably stable liquid detergent composition,

which evidently applies across the amount ranges for lipase and polyethyleneimine given in D2.

The fact that D2 does not disclose which effect might be obtained by increasing the level of EPEI beyond the improved effect in combination with lipase, as argued by the respondent, is thus not decisive, as a wash improvement is anyhow attained by using EPEI in combination with the lipase, the presence of which is not excluded by claim 1 at issue. Indeed, in this respect, the examples of D2 show that a constant level of lipase (3.2 mg/100g) is accompanied by a constant level of EPEI according to formulae I and II (1 wt.-%) and by a variable level of another EPEI (note 2 under Table 1). Hence, in the combined use of lipase and EPEI of D2, the skilled person has the possibility of modifying both in proportion or to further adjust the level of a further EPEI, of course within the disclosed (preferred) ranges.

The skilled person seeking to attain improved grease and oil cleaning results would thus manifestly try to use lipase and EPEI at least within the (most) preferred EPEI amounts of respectively up to 5 wt% or up to 3 wt% of D2, e.g. in compositions such as those of the examples, which also include soil release polymers. Indeed, as argued by the appellant, already with an increase from 1.49 % (as in composition C) to 1.7 wt% of EPEI, hence well within the most preferred range of up to 3 wt.-% of EPEI, the skilled person would arrive in an obvious way to the claimed method.

Thus the skilled person had a motivation to increase the EPEI amount (as taught in D2) above the respective amount in example C (which would inevitably lead to a ratio NSS/EPEI of 7:1 or lower) already because D2 is directed towards using modified polyethyleneimines for improved grease and oil soil cleaning.

3.6.5 The method of claim 1 at issue was thus obvious over that of D2 alone.

3.7 It follows that the main request is not allowable because the ground of opposition under Article 100(a) EPC (lack of an inventive step) prejudices the maintenance of the patent as granted.

4. Auxiliary Requests 1 to 6

4.1 Admittance

At the beginning of the oral proceedings, the board stressed that the admittance of these late-filed (just before the oral proceedings) auxiliary requests was at the board's discretion inter alia under Article 13 RPBA 2020. The board expressed in particular serious concerns on the admittance of all these requests apart from auxiliary requests 5 and 6, which were pending during the opposition proceedings and at the beginning of appeal proceedings, since auxiliary requests 1 to 4 as such had never been at issue before, and since no exceptional circumstances justifying their late filing was apparent. In any case, at the oral proceedings, it became clear that these auxiliary requests were prima facie not clearly allowable (T 1286/14, reasons 2.2.2), for the following reasons:

4.1.1 Auxiliary request 1

4.1.2 According to the patent proprietors, claims 1 and 2 of this request were only supplemented by the features of granted claim 6, namely as follows:

"1. A method of laundering fabric which comprises the steps of:

a) providing a pourable liquid detergent composition comprising ethoxylated polyethyleneimine, soil release polymer at a level of from 3 wt% to 9.0 wt% of the composition, 10-40% wt of surfactant, [...]."

"2. A method of laundering fabric which comprises the steps of:

a) providing a multidose container which contains a pourable liquid detergent composition comprising ethoxylated polyethyleneimine, soil release polymer at a level of from 3 wt% to 9.0 wt% of the composition, 10-40% wt of surfactant, [...]."

4.1.3 However, the appellant and the board spotted further substantial amendments in claims 2 and 5 as follows:

"2. A method of laundering fabric which comprises the steps of:

a) [...],

b) mixing a dose of the detergent composition comprising 4 to 8 g non-soap surfactant, at least 0.5 g of soil release polymer and at least 0.5 g of a [deleted: the] [deleted: ethoxylated] polyethyleneimine, with water to obtain a wash liquor, wherein the ratio of non-soap surfactant to ethoxylated polyethyleneimine is from 2:1 to 7:1, and

c) [...]."

"5. A method according to any preceding claim wherein the composition comprises a [deleted: ethoxylated] polyethyleneimine, at a level of 0.01 to 25 wt%, preferably more than 3 and/or less than 9.5 wt% of the composition, most preferably 4 to 9 wt% of the composition."

4.1.4 These further amendments are prima facie objectionable at least because the deletion of "ethoxylated" from the feature "[deleted: ethoxylated] polyethyleneimine", which was present in the claims as granted and essential in particular with respect to the ratio between NSS and ethoxylated polyethyleneimines (now also in step b of claim 2), renders the claims unclear (Article 84 EPC). Furthermore these amendments, especially in dependent claim 5, do not overcome any of the invoked grounds for opposition (Rule 80 EPC).

4.1.5 Therefore, late-filed auxiliary request 1 is prima facie not clearly allowable under the EPC.

4.2 Auxiliary requests 2 to 4

4.2.1 The same amendments to claims 2 and 5 of auxiliary request 1 are contained respectively in each claim 2 and each claim 5 of auxiliary requests 2 and 4.

Moreover, also the amendment in each claim 1 of auxiliary requests 2 and 3, respectively reading:

"1. A method of laundering fabric which comprises the steps of:

a) providing a pourable liquid detergent composition comprising a polyethyleneimine at a level of more than 3 wt% of the composition, ethoxylated polyethyleneimine, soil release polymer, 10-40% wt of surfactant, [...]."

and

"1. A method of laundering fabric which comprises the steps of:

a) providing a pourable liquid detergent composition comprising a polyethyleneimine at a level of 4 to 9 wt% of the composition, ethoxylated polyethyleneimine, soil release polymer, 10-40% wt of surfactant, [...].",

introduce ambiguity, and thus gives rise to an objection of lack of clarity (Article 84 EPC), due to the simultaneous presence in the claim of the features "polyethyleneimine" and "ethoxylated polyethyleneimine".

Consequently, also auxiliary requests 2 to 4 are prima facie not clearly allowable (Article 84, Rule 80 EPC).

4.3 Auxiliary requests 5 and 6

4.3.1 The amendments to claims 2 and 5 of auxiliary request 1 are contained in each claim 2 of auxiliary requests 5 and 6, as well as in claim 4 of auxiliary request 5 and in claim 5 of auxiliary request 6.

4.3.2 Moreover, the method of claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 is limited by the feature "and wherein the composition comprises 5 to 20000 LU/g lipase", not imparting any distinction over that of D2/example C, containing this enzyme in an amount as now defined. Prompted by the board, the respondent did not comment on this issue.

4.3.3 Finally, claims 1 and 2 of auxiliary request 6 contain an amendment "greater than 2% wt. of soil release polymer", which was not present in the claims as granted or as originally filed, which has thus been taken from the description, and which consequently raises questions under Article 123(2) EPC.

4.3.4 Hence, in view of the above objections, also auxiliary requests 5 and 6 are (clearly) not allowable, at least under Article 84 and Rule 80 EPC, or, auxiliary request 5, under Article 56 EPC and, auxiliary request 6, under Article 13 RPBA 2020 (Article 123(2) EPC).

5. It follows that none of the requests on file is allowable.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The appealed decision is set aside

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility