Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • Find a professional representative
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t181433eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 1433/18 22-09-2022
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 1433/18 22-09-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T143318.20220922
Date of decision
22 September 2022
Case number
T 1433/18
Petition for review of
-
Application number
13734792.8
IPC class
H04N 21/422
G06F 3/0354
H04N 5/44
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 526.64 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

REMOTE CONTROL FOR REMOTELY CONTROLLING AN APPARATUS FOR RECEIVING TELEVISION SIGNALS, CONNECTING TO THE INTERNET AND FUNCTIONING AS A MULTIMEDIA CENTER, AND RELATED SYSTEM THEREOF

Applicant name
Saronikos Trading and Services, Unipessoal Lda
Opponent name
-
Board
3.5.04
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art
Keywords

Main request, auxiliary requests I, III, IV - inventive step - (no)

New auxiliary request I - amendment to appeal case - amendment overcomes issues raised (no)

Auxiliary requests II, V, VI - amendment after summons - cogent reasons (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0989/15
T 0954/17
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal is against the examining division's decision to refuse European patent application No. 13 734 792.8, published as international patent application WO 2015/003743 A1.

II. The prior-art documents cited in the decision under appeal included the following:

D1: WO 03/044625 A2

D3: WO 2008/130362 A1

D5: US 2007/0058047 A1

D6: US 5 638 061 A

III. The decision under appeal was based on the following grounds.

(a) The subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request was not new in view of the disclosure of document D6 (Article 54 EPC). The subject-matter of claims 1 and 13 to 15 of the main request lacked inventive step in view of the disclosure of document D1 combined with the disclosure of document D6 or common general knowledge (Article 56 EPC).

(b) The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 lacked inventive step in view of the disclosure of document D1 combined with the disclosure of document D6 or common general knowledge (Article 56 EPC).

(c) The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary requests 2 and 3 was not new in view of the disclosure of document D6 (Article 54 EPC). The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary requests 2 and 3 lacked inventive step in view of the disclosure of document D1 combined with the disclosure of document D6 (Article 56 EPC).

(d) The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 lacked inventive step in view of the disclosure of document D1 combined with the disclosure of documents D5 and D6 or combined with the disclosure of document D5 and common general knowledge (Article 56 EPC).

(e) The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 lacked inventive step in view of the disclosure of document D1 combined with the disclosure of documents D5 and D6.

IV. The applicant (appellant) filed notice of appeal. With the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant maintained the main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 5 on which the decision under appeal was based. It provided arguments to support its opinion that the claims met the requirements of Articles 54 and 56 EPC.

V. The board issued summons to oral proceedings and a communication under Article 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal in the 2020 version (RPBA 2020, see OJ EPO 2019, A63). In this communication, the board submitted the following.

(a) Claim 1 of none of the requests then on file met the requirements of Article 84 EPC.

(b) For the examination of novelty and inventive step, the board interpreted the claims in a manner consistent with the description, page 4, line 25 to page 5, line 3; page 8, lines 18 to 24 and page 14, lines 2 to 12.

(c) The subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request and auxiliary requests 2 and 3 lacked novelty in view of the disclosure of document D6 (Article 54 EPC).

(d) Document D3 was an appropriate starting point for the assessment of inventive step of the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 1. The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 lacked inventive step over the combined disclosure of documents D3, D5 and D6 (Article 56 EPC).

(e) The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary requests 4 and 5 lacked inventive step over the combined disclosure of documents D6 and D5 (Article 56 EPC).

VI. By letter of reply dated 22 August 2022, the appellant filed amended claims of a main request and auxiliary requests I to VI. The appellant indicated a basis in the application as filed for the amendments and submitted reasons why, in its opinion, the claims met the requirements of Articles 54, 56 and 84 EPC.

VII. On 22 September 2022, oral proceedings took place before the board.

The appellant's final requests were that the decision under appeal be set aside and that a European patent be granted on the basis of the claims of the main request or, alternatively, on the basis of the claims of auxiliary request I, both requests filed by letter of 22 August 2022, or on the basis of the claims of "New Auxiliary request 1" filed during oral proceedings on 22 September 2022, or on the basis of the claims of one of auxiliary requests II to VI filed by letter of 22 August 2022.

At the end of the oral proceedings, the chair announced the board's decision.

VIII. Claim 1 of the main request reads as follows:

"System for remotely controlling a television apparatus capable of working in different operative modes, namely receiving broadcasted signals, connecting to the Internet and functioning as a multimedia center, said system comprising said television apparatus and a remote control (1) being able to cooperate with said television apparatus and comprises rotary means (2) comprising a sphere and actuating means (3A,3B,3C,3D,6) for an execution, said remote control (1) being configured to carry out different functions depending on which of said operative modes of the television apparatus has been selected by accessing a menu of said television apparatus and in reply to said execution of said rotary means (2) and said actuating means (3A,3B,3C,3D,6) of said remote control (1)."

IX. Claim 1 of auxiliary request I reads as follows:

"System for remotely controlling a television apparatus capable of operating in different operative modes, namely receiving broadcasted signals, connecting to the Internet and functioning as a multimedia center, said system comprising said television apparatus and a remote control (1) able to cooperate with said television apparatus, said remote control (1) comprises rotary means (2) comprising a sphere and actuating means (3A,3B,3C,3D,6) for an execution, said remote control (1) being configured to carry out different functions depending on which of said operative modes of the television apparatus has been selected by accessing a menu of said television apparatus and in reply to said execution of said rotary means (2) and said actuating means (3A,3B,3C,3D,6) of said remote control,

wherein if said television apparatus is operating in a 'TV mode', a displacement of said rotary means (2) along a longitudinal axis (Y) of the same in a manner concordant with a first direction (V) increases by one position in a list of channels, the service to be tuned in relation to the previous one, likewise a displacement of said rotary means (2) along said longitudinal axis (Y) in an opposite manner to said first direction (V) decreases by one position in a list of channels, the service to be tuned in relation to the previous one and

wherein a displacement of said rotary means (2) along a transversal axis (X) of the same in a manner concordant with a second direction (P) increases the volume value in relation to the actual value, likewise a displacement of said rotary means (2) along said transversal axis (X) in an opposite manner to said second direction (P) decreases the volume value in relation to the actual value,

wherein in said 'internet mode' the actuating means (3A,3B,3C,3D) and rotary means (2) perform different functions compared to the 'TV mode' and wherein in said 'internet mode' said rotary means (2) are configured to perform the function of controlling a pointing device."

X. Claim 1 of "New Auxiliary request I" differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request I in that the operation in a "TV mode" and an "internet mode" is further defined as follows (amendments relative to claim 1 of auxiliary request I are underlined):

"wherein, if said television apparatus is operating in a 'TV mode', it allows for the viewing of a broadcasted program and a displacement of said rotary means (2) ...

wherein, in a [sic] 'internet mode', said television apparatus allows the display of a browser and the actuating means ..."

XI. Claim 1 of auxiliary request II differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request I in that the following text is added before the full stop:

", wherein said actuating means (3A,3B,3C,3D) comprise four keys (3A,3B,3C,3D) arranged in proximity to said sphere, in which a first key (3A) and a second key (3B) are arranged on the upper part of the remote control (1), and in which a third key (3C) and a fourth key (3D) are arranged on the lower part of the remote control (1)"

XII. Claim 1 of auxiliary request III and auxiliary request IV differs from claim 1 of the main request and auxiliary request I, respectively, in that the following text is inserted before the full stop:

", wherein an 'ENTER' function is obtained by way of pressing down said rotary means (2), in particular said sphere"

XIII. Claim 1 of auxiliary request V differs from claim 1 of the main request in that the following text is inserted before the full stop:

", wherein said actuator means (3A,3B,3C,3D,6) comprise means for adjusting the sensitivity (6) of the rotary means (2), in particular a wheel,

wherein, when said means for adjusting the sensitivity (6) are set to the maximum possible value, the rotary means (2) enable additional operations according to the operative mode selected, in particular at least one of the following additional operations:

- when said television apparatus is operating in a 'TV mode', at that time a displacement of said rotary means (2) along a longitudinal axis (Y) of the same in a manner concordant with a first direction (V) increases by a plurality of positions in a list of channels, the service to be tuned in relation to the previous one, in particular ten units, likewise a displacement of said rotary means (2) along said longitudinal axis (Y) in an opposite manner to said first direction (V) decreases by a plurality of positions in a list of channels, the service to be tuned in relation to the previous one, in particular ten units;

- when said television apparatus is operating in an 'Internet mode' or in a 'Smart TV mode', a displacement of said rotary means (2) along a longitudinal axis (Y) of the same allows for carrying out a scrolling function of a current page on said screen;

- when said television apparatus operates as a multimedia center managing image files, a displacement of said rotary means (2) allows for scrolling groups of images, in particular ten images"

XIV. Claim 1 of auxiliary request VI differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request I in that the following text is inserted before the full stop:

", wherein an 'ENTER' function is obtained by way of pressing down said rotary means (2), in particular said sphere,

wherein said actuator means (3A,3B,3C,3D,6) comprise means for adjusting the sensitivity (6) of the rotary means (2), in particular a wheel,

wherein, when said means for adjusting the sensitivity (6) are set to the maximum possible value, the rotary means (2) enable additional operations according to the operative mode selected, in particular at least one of the following additional operations:

- when said television apparatus is operating in a 'TV mode', at that time a displacement of said rotary means (2) along a longitudinal axis (Y) of the same in a manner concordant with a first direction (V) increases by a plurality of positions in a list of channels, the service to be tuned in relation to the previous one, in particular ten units, likewise a displacement of said rotary means (2) along said longitudinal axis (Y) in an opposite manner to said first direction (V) decreases by a plurality of positions in a list of channels, the service to be tuned in relation to the previous one, in particular ten units;

- when said television apparatus is operating in an 'Internet mode' or in a 'Smart TV mode', a displacement of said rotary means (2) along a longitudinal axis (Y) of the same allows for carrying out a scrolling function of a current page on said screen;

- when said television apparatus operates as a multimedia center managing image files, a displacement of said rotary means (2) allows for scrolling groups of images, in particular ten images"

XV. The appellant's arguments relevant to the present decision may be summarised as follows.

Main request and auxiliary requests I, III and IV

(a) Document D3 taught different operative modes of a remote control but not of a television apparatus (see D3, page 9, lines 1 to 4). Changing the channel, adjusting the volume or navigating a menu were not different operative modes of a television apparatus.

(b) The distinguishing features were functionally interdependent because accessing the internet, i.e. a browser, required higher precision in the navigation provided by the remote control, and a trackball was thus of particular advantage.

(c) Document D5 taught away from using a trackball in a remote control.

"New Auxiliary request I"

(d) During the oral proceedings, the board interpreted an operative mode of a television connecting to the internet for the first time as merely receiving a television programme via the internet. This was an exceptional circumstance to which the appellant could not have reacted earlier than by filing "New Auxiliary request I" during the oral proceedings. This request was thus to be admitted into the appeal proceedings.

Auxiliary requests II, V, VI

(e) Starting from a different document cited in the decision under appeal as the closest prior art in an inventive-step objection was a new objection in the communication of the board. This was an exceptional circumstance within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 and thus allowed amending the claim.

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. Main request and auxiliary requests I, III and IV - admittance (Article 13(2) RPBA 2020)

2.1 The main request and auxiliary requests I, III and IV were filed after the notification of the summons to oral proceedings. These requests are therefore amendments within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

2.2 The board raised for the first time objections of lack of clarity in the communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020. In response to this communication, the appellant filed the main request and auxiliary requests I, III and IV with the aim of overcoming these new objections. This represents an exceptional circumstance within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020. Exercising its discretion under this provision, the board thus decided to admit the main request and auxiliary requests I, III and IV into the appeal proceedings.

3. Main request - inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

3.1 Document D3 may be considered the closest prior art for the assessment of inventive step of the subject-matter of claim 1.

3.2 Document D3 discloses a system (see Figure 1: 100) for remotely controlling a television apparatus (see Figure 1: 102) capable of working in different operative modes (see page 9, lines 1 to 5 and page 10, line 20, according to which one operative mode of the television may be a mode in which menu navigation takes place and another operative mode of the television may be a mode in which broadcasted signals are received and television commands such as channel changing or volume adjustment occur), namely receiving broadcasted signals, this system comprising the television apparatus and a remote control (see Figure 1: 104) being able to cooperate with the television apparatus (see page 4, lines 13 to 15: "The television system 100 includes a television 102 and a remote control 104 that cooperate to facilitate operation of the television 102 by a user") and which comprises a rotary means (see Figure 4: 400 and page 7, lines 2 to 4: "the control element 106 may include a tiltable scroll wheel that can be activated by tilting it to the left or right to activate certain features") and an actuating means for an execution (see page 8, lines 12 to 17: "if the control element 106 is a ... scroll wheel, it may be activated by pushing directly down on a central portion of the ... scroll wheel. In some embodiments, multiple buttons may be arranged beneath the control element 106 such that they are activated based on what manner and/or in what direction the control element 106 is activated"), the remote control being configured to carry out different functions depending on which operative mode of the television apparatus has been selected and in reply to the execution of the rotary means and the actuating means of the remote control (see page 9, lines 2 to 5: "Manipulation or activation of the control element 106 may facilitate initiation of television commands, navigation of menu").

3.3 The appellant argued that document D3 taught different operative modes of a remote control but not of a television apparatus. Changing the channel, adjusting the volume or navigating a menu were not different operative modes of a television apparatus (see point XV.(a) above).

The board is not convinced by these arguments and finds that an operative mode is a broad term encompassing a set of different parameters which put a television apparatus into a particular way of working. For example, page 1 of document D3 sets out such different ways of working, namely channel changing, volume adjustment, manipulation of viewing settings, video recording and display of closed captions.

3.4 The subject-matter of claim 1 thus differs from the disclosure of document D3 in that the former specifies that:

(a) the rotary means comprises a sphere

(b) the television apparatus is capable of connecting to the internet and functioning as a multimedia centre wherein these different operative modes are selected by accessing a menu of the television apparatus

3.5 The board finds that these distinguishing features are a mere aggregation and not functionally interdependent. The mechanical implementation of the rotary means has no bearing on the use of these means in different operating modes of the television apparatus. Whether a television apparatus receives a programme via broadcast or the internet does not change the presentation of this programme on the television apparatus. Hence, it has to be established whether each of the distinguishing features a) and b) is separately obvious in light of the prior art (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office, 10th edition 2022 ("Case Law"), I.D.9.3.2, corresponding to sectionI.D.9.2.2 of the 9th edition 2019 of the Case Law referred to in the board's communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020).

3.6 The appellant argued that the distinguishing features were functionally interdependent because accessing the internet, i.e. a browser, required higher precision in the navigation provided by remote control, and a trackball was thus of particular advantage (see point XV.(b) above).

The board is not convinced by these arguments because the same programme can be obtained from a terrestrial television station or via the internet. Operating a pointing device with more precision helps navigating any kind of menu, regardless of whether that menu is received via a terrestrial broadcast or the internet. Claim 1 only specifies that the television apparatus is capable of connecting to the internet and does not require the use of a browser.

3.7 The partial objective technical problem related to feature a) may be regarded as providing alternative mechanical means to create left/right and up/down commands.

3.8 A track ball, as disclosed in document D6, is a known alternative to the tiltable scroll wheel on the remote control according to document D3 for creating left/right and up/down commands in the context of a television receiver (see D6, column 1, lines 17 to 20: "Track ball mechanisms ... are finding increased use in television receivers having on-screen menus").

3.9 It is established case law that applying one of the possible solutions available to the person skilled in the art requires no particular skill and hence does not involve an inventive step (see Case Law, I.D.9.21.9 a)). Therefore, the board finds that substituting the tiltable scroll wheel known from document D3 with a track ball cannot contribute to inventive step.

3.10 The appellant argued that document D5 taught away from using a trackball in a remote control (see point XV.(c) above).

The board is not convinced by this argument. Paragraph [0006] of document D5 reads "wireless keyboards may include an integrated trackball or other pointing device to provide mouse type control of the PC or Internet functions. These types of multi-directional controls are less natural and convenient to use than a separate mouse controller. Also, such systems require both hands to use making simple one handed navigation of a GUI TV interface impossible". Document D5 thus states that simple one-handed navigation of a TV GUI is impossible only in combination with a wireless keyboard. This does not teach away from using a trackball.

3.11 The partial objective technical problem related to distinguishing feature b) may be regarded as how to extend the operative modes of the television.

3.12 Extending the functionality of a television to include an internet operative mode had become common place, as set out in the background section of document D5. There it is stated that "set top Internet access devices have been introduced which integrate Internet access capabilities with conventional televisions" (see D5, paragraph [0005]). Furthermore, document D5 discloses that different modes of a television apparatus, including a "TV" mode, a "WEB" mode and a "DVR" mode, can be selected by accessing a menu of the television apparatus (see D5, Figure 9A).

3.13 Therefore, given the partial objective technical problem set out under point 3.11, the person skilled in the art would have incorporated these features of document D5 into a system according to document D3, thus arriving at the distinguishing feature b) indicated under point 3.4 above.

3.14 In view of the findings under points 3.5, 3.9 and 3.13, the board concludes that the subject-matter of claim 1 according to the main request does not involve an inventive step within the meaning of Article 56 EPC.

4. Auxiliary request I - inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

4.1 The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request I differs from claim 1 of the main request in that the former specifies the following additional features:

(a) wherein if said television apparatus is operating in a "TV mode", a displacement of said rotary means along a longitudinal axis of the same in a manner concordant with a first direction increases by one position in a list of channels, the service to be tuned in relation to the previous one, likewise a displacement of said rotary means along said longitudinal axis in an opposite manner to said first direction decreases by one position in a list of channels, the service to be tuned in relation to the previous one

(b) wherein a displacement of said rotary means along a transversal axis of the same in a manner concordant with a second direction increases the volume value in relation to the actual value, likewise a displacement of said rotary means along said transversal axis in an opposite manner to said second direction decreases the volume value in relation to the actual value

(c) wherein in said "internet mode" the actuating means and rotary means perform different functions compared to the "TV mode" and wherein in said "internet mode" said rotary means are configured to perform the function of controlling a pointing device

4.2 The additional features a) and b) are known from document D3, Figure 4: "Content+", "Previous Content" and "Vol-", "Vol+".

4.3 Hence, the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request I differs from the disclosure of document D3 in that the former specifies that:

(a) the rotary means comprises a sphere

(b) the television apparatus is capable of connecting to the internet and functioning as a multimedia centre, wherein these different operative modes are selected by accessing a menu of the television apparatus, where in the "internet mode" the actuating means and rotary means perform different functions compared to the "TV mode" and where in the "internet mode" the rotary means are configured to perform the function of controlling a pointing device

4.4 The board is of the opinion that these distinguishing features relate to different partial objective technical problems for the reasons set out under point 3.5 above.

4.5 The partial objective technical problem related to distinguishing feature a) and its solution cannot contribute to inventive step for the reasons set out under points 3.7 to 3.9 above.

4.6 The partial objective technical problem related to distinguishing feature b) may be regarded as how to extend the operative modes of the television and adapt the use of the rotary and actuating means accordingly.

4.7 Extending the functionality of a television to include internet operative modes had become common place as set out in the background section of document D5. There it is stated that "set top Internet access devices have been introduced which integrate Internet access capabilities with conventional televisions" (see D5, paragraph [0005]). The same background section of document D5 indicates "convenient control of PC type functions also requires an ability to interface with a Graphical User Interface (GUI)" and the need for "an up-down-left-right control to move around in a limited GUI interface" (see D5, paragraph [0006]). Furthermore, document D5 discloses that different modes of a television apparatus, including a "TV" mode, a "WEB" mode and a "DVR" mode are selected by accessing a menu of the television apparatus (see D5, Figure 9A).

4.8 In view of the above, the board finds that the person skilled in the art would have extended the operative modes of the television apparatus according to document D3 to include an "internet mode" and so it functioned as a multimedia centre. Moreover, it would have been obvious to use the rotary and actuating means already available in the television apparatus according to document D3 (see D3, page 9, lines 2 to 5: "Manipulation or activation of the control element 106 may facilitate ... navigation of menu") to fulfil the need of "an up-down-left-right control to move around in a limited GUI interface" in an "internet mode".

4.9 Therefore, the person skilled in the art would have arrived at the distinguishing feature b) indicated under point 4.3 above in a straightforward manner.

4.10 In view of the findings under points 4.4, 4.5 and 4.9, the board concludes that the subject-matter of claim 1 according to auxiliary request I does not involve an inventive step within the meaning of Article 56 EPC.

5. "New Auxiliary request I" - admittance (Article 13(2) and (1) RPBA 2020)

5.1 "New Auxiliary request I" was filed during the oral proceedings before the board, i.e. after the notification of the summons to oral proceedings. "New Auxiliary request I" is therefore an amendment within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

5.2 Under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, any amendment to a party's appeal case after notification of a summons to oral proceedings is, in principle, not to be taken into account unless there are exceptional circumstances, which have been justified with cogent reasons by the party concerned.

5.3 The explanatory remarks on Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 contain the following guidance: "At the third level of the convergent approach, the Board may also rely on criteria applicable at the second level of the convergent approach, i.e. as set out in proposed new paragraph 1 of Article 13" (see Document CA/3/19, section VI, explanatory remarks on Article 13(2), fourth paragraph). The board takes the view that, at the third level of the convergent approach, the boards are free to use or not use the criteria set out in Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 when deciding, in exercising their discretion in accordance with Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, whether to admit an amendment made at this stage of the proceedings (see also decisions T 989/15, point 16.2 of the Reasons, and T 954/17, point 3.10 of the Reasons).

Under Article 13(1) RPBA 2020, the onus is on the appellant to demonstrate that any amendment overcomes, prima facie, the issues raised by the board and does not give rise to new objections (see Document CA/3/19, section VI, explanatory remarks on Article 13(1), third paragraph).

5.4 Claim 1 of "New Auxiliary request I" differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request I in that the former further specifies:

(a) if said television apparatus is operating in a "TV mode", it allows for the viewing of a broadcasted programme

(b) in an "internet mode", said television apparatus allows the display of a browser

5.5 The board finds that the term "TV mode" had already been interpreted in the sense of feature a). Thus, adding feature a) cannot overcome the objection of lack of inventive step raised by the board.

Concerning feature b), the board finds that the already cited paragraph [0005] of document D5 mentions an "Internet browser" (see D5, paragraph [0005], fifth sentence). Therefore, the board finds that the display of a browser in an "internet mode" cannot overcome the objection of lack of inventive step raised by the board either.

5.6 Therefore, the board finds that the appellant did not demonstrate that the amendments quoted under point 5.4 above overcome, prima facie, the objection of lack of inventive step raised by the board.

Whether the board's interpretation of an operative mode of a television connecting to the internet created an exceptional circumstance (see point XV.(d) above) is thus not decisive for the admittance of "New Auxiliary request I" and can be left open.

5.7 Hence, the board exercised its discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, using the criteria of Article 13(1) RPBA 2020, and did not admit "New Auxiliary request I" into the appeal proceedings.

6. Auxiliary request II - admittance (Article 13(2) RPBA 2020)

6.1 Auxiliary request II was filed after the notification of the summons to oral proceedings and is therefore an amendment within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

6.2 Under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, any amendment to a party's appeal case after notification of a summons to oral proceedings is, in principle, not to be taken into account unless there are exceptional circumstances, which have been justified with cogent reasons by the party concerned.

6.3 The explanatory remarks on Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 contain the following guidance: "The basic principle of the third level of the convergent approach is that, at this stage of the appeal proceedings, amendments to a party's appeal case are not to be taken into consideration. However, a limited exception is provided for: it requires a party to present compelling reasons which justify clearly why the circumstances leading to the amendment are indeed exceptional in the particular appeal ('cogent reasons'). For example, if a party submits that the Board raised an objection for the first time in a communication, it must explain precisely why this objection is new and does not fall under objections previously raised by the Board or a party. The Board may decide to admit the amendment in the exercise of its discretion" (see document CA/3/19, section VI, explanatory remarks on Article 13(2), third paragraph).

6.4 Furthermore, when filing new submissions in the appeal phase specified in Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, a party, in providing "cogent reasons", should not only identify the circumstances invoked and explain why they should be regarded as exceptional but also explain why these circumstances had the direct result of preventing it from filing its requests at an earlier stage; in other words, there should be a causal link between the exceptional circumstances and the late filing (see Case Law, V.A.4.5.4 b)).

6.5 Claim 1 of auxiliary request II corresponds to claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 on which the decision under appeal was based except for:

(a) amendments made to resolve the clarity objections raised by the board

(b) additional features reading "wherein said actuating means (3A, 3B,3C, 3D) comprise four keys (3A, 3B, 3C, 3D) arranged in proximity to said sphere, in which a first key (3A) and a second key (3B) are arranged on the upper part of the remote control (1), and in which a third key (3C) and a fourth key (3D) are arranged on the lower part of the remote control (1)"

6.6 In the decision under appeal, the examining division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 lacked inventive step in view of document D1 combined with document D6 or in view of document D1 combined with common general knowledge (see decision under appeal, page 4, last paragraph).

6.7 In the communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020, the board also expressed the preliminary opinion that the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 lacked inventive step, but in view of document D3 combined with documents D6 and D5 (see point V. above). The new aspect that the board introduced in its communication was thus not the inventive-step objection but its reasoning starting from a different document cited in the decision under appeal as the closest prior art.

6.8 The appellant argued that changing the closest prior art in an inventive-step objection created a new objection in the communication of the board. This was an exceptional circumstance within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 and thus allowed amending the claim (see point XV.(e) above).

6.9 However, the additional features in b) quoted above, namely the specification of further buttons on the remote control, are not a reaction to starting from document D3 rather than document D1 as the closest prior art. These additional features also do not concern the main issue under debate, namely a potential synergistic effect between the rotary means comprising a sphere and the operation of a television apparatus in an "internet mode". Consequently, the amendment made by adding the features in b) is not causally linked to starting from document D3 as the closest prior art. The appellant merely used the opportunity to add features unrelated to the difference in disclosure between document D1 and D3. Hence, the board finds that there is no causal link between the exceptional circumstances, i.e. the inventive-step objection raised by the board starting from document D3 rather than document D1, and the late filing of auxiliary request II.

6.10 Moreover, when exercising its discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, the board may also rely on the criteria set out in Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 (see point 5.3 above). The second sentence of Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 reads: "Article 12, paragraphs 4 to 6, shall apply mutatis mutandis". According to Article 12(6), second sentence, RPBA 2020, "the board shall not admit requests ... which should have been submitted ... in the proceedings leading to the decision under appeal, unless the circumstances of the appeal case justify their admittance" (see also Case Law, V.A.4.5.10 f)). The board notes that the latter provision is identical in substance to the criterion set out in Article 12(4) RPBA 2007 in which requests which could have been presented in the first-instance proceedings are interpreted as requests which should have been presented in the first-instance proceedings (see Case Law, V.A.5.11.4 a)). The board further notes that it had already been recognised in the case law on the RPBA 2007 that the fact that requests could have been presented in the first-instance proceedings was another criterion potentially to be considered when exercising discretion under Article 13(1) RPBA 2007, i.e. at a later stage of the proceedings (see Case Law, V.A.5.11.2).

6.11 In the set of claims according to auxiliary request 1 underlying the impugned decision, the category of claim 1 is the same as in the requests currently on file. This set of claims was discussed during the oral proceedings before the examining division (see minutes of the oral proceedings, page 2, last paragraph to page 3, fifth paragraph). In this discussion, it became apparent that the examining division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 lacked inventive step.

The board finds that at this time, the appellant should have filed amended claims containing the features which it now submitted at the appeal stage (see point 6.5 b) above) to overcome the examining division's inventive-step objection.

However, according to the minutes of the oral proceedings, the appellant neither made further submissions on this request nor filed amended claims (see minutes of the oral proceedings, page 3, penultimate paragraph to page 4, last paragraph).

The appellant's representative submitted that at the time of the oral proceedings before the examining division, he had not been the acting representative. He was thus not in a position to argue why corresponding amended claims were not filed at this stage.

The board does not accept this as a valid reason for the late filing of requests, a change of representative being at the party's own risk (see Case Law, V.A.5.8.2).

6.12 In view of the above, the board exercised its discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 and did not admit auxiliary request II into the appeal proceedings.

7. Auxiliary requests III and IV - inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

7.1 Claim 1 of auxiliary requests III and IV differs from claim 1 of the main request and auxiliary request I, respectively, only in that the former further specifies that "an 'ENTER' function is obtained by way of pressing down said rotary means (2)".

7.2 This additional feature is disclosed in document D3, page 8, lines 22 to 24, reading "pushing directly down on the control element 106 may initiate a 'select' function to enable a user to select menu options". Selecting a menu option is equivalent to an 'ENTER' function.

7.3 Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary requests III and IV lacks inventive step within the meaning of Article 56 EPC for the same reasons as set out above for claim 1 of the main request and the first auxiliary request, respectively (see points 3. and 4.).

8. Auxiliary requests V and VI - admittance (Article 13(2) RPBA 2020)

8.1 Auxiliary requests V and VI were filed after the notification of the summons to oral proceedings and are therefore amendments within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020.

8.2 Claim 1 of auxiliary requests V and VI differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 and 5, respectively, by, inter alia, the following amended features:

"wherein, when said means for adjusting the sensitivity (6) are set to the maximum possible value, the rotary means (2) enable additional operations according to the operative mode selected, in particular at least one of the following additional operations:

- when said television apparatus is operating in a "TV mode", at that time a displacement of said rotary means (2) along a longitudinal axis (Y) of the same in a manner concordant with a first direction (V) increases by a plurality of positions in a list of channels, the service to be tuned in relation to the previous one, in particular ten units, likewise a displacement of said rotary means (2) along said longitudinal axis (Y) in an opposite manner to said first direction (V) decreases by a plurality of positions in a list of channels, the service to be tuned in relation to the previous one, in particular ten units;

- when said television apparatus is operating in an 'Internet mode' or in a 'Smart TV mode', a displacement of said rotary means (2) along a longitudinal axis (Y) of the same allows for carrying out a scrolling function of a current page on said screen;

- when said television apparatus operates as a multimedia center managing image files, a displacement of said rotary means (2) allows for scrolling groups of images, in particular ten images"

8.3 In the decision under appeal, the examining division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary requests 4 and 5 lacked inventive step in view of the disclosure of document D1 combined with the disclosure of documents D5 and D6 (see point III. above).

8.4 In the communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020, the board expressed the preliminary opinion that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the then auxiliary requests 4 and 5 lacked inventive step in view of the disclosure of documents D5 and D6 (see point V. above) rather than the combined disclosure of document D1, D5 and D6 referred to by the examining division. The new aspect that the board introduced in its communication was thus not the inventive-step objection but its reasoning.

8.5 However, the additional features quoted under point 8.2 above, namely the specification of additional operations if the sensitivity is adjusted to a maximum possible value, are not related to identifying a different document cited in the decision under appeal as the closest prior art. The amendment made by the new features is not causally linked to the change of reasoning. The appellant merely used the opportunity to add features unrelated to the fact that document D1 was no longer identified as the closest prior art (see also points 6.4 to 6.9 above).

8.6 Moreover, the board is of the opinion that the appellant should have filed requests with independent claims containing the amended features during the first-instance proceedings for the same reasons as set out under points 6.10 and 6.11 above.

8.7 In view of the above, the board exercised its discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 and did not admit auxiliary requests V and VI into the appeal proceedings.

9. Conclusion

The main request and auxiliary requests I, III and IV are not allowable because claim 1 of each of these requests does not meet the requirements of Article 56 EPC. "New Auxiliary request I" and auxiliary requests II, V and VI were not admitted into the appeal proceedings. Since none of the appellant's requests is allowable, the appeal must be dismissed.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility