Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Find a professional representative
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • About the Observatory
      • Our activities
      • Our topics
      • Our partners and networks
      • Digital library
      • Data desk
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Patent filings
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Detailed methodology
            • Archive
          • Online Services
          • Patent information
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Innovation process survey
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Website
          • Survey on electronic invoicing
          • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
        • Culture Space A&T 5-10
          • Go back
          • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
            • Go back
            • aqua_forensic
            • LIMINAL
            • MaterialLab
            • Perfect Sleep
            • Proof of Work
            • TerraPort
            • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
            • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • The European Patent Journey
          • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
          • Next generation statements
          • Open storage
          • Cosmic bar
        • Lange Nacht 2023
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the Observatory
      • Our activities
      • Our topics
      • Our partners and networks
      • Digital library
      • Data desk
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t190465eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 0465/19 21-07-2022
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0465/19 21-07-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T046519.20220721
Date of decision
21 July 2022
Case number
T 0465/19
Petition for review of
-
Application number
12863091.0
IPC class
C09K 11/06
C07D 307/91
H01L 51/54
H01L 51/46
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 510.43 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

COMPOUND FOR ORGANIC OPTOELECTRIC DEVICE, ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE INCLUDING SAME, AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE

Applicant name
Cheil Industries Inc.
Opponent name
Merck Patent GmbH
Board
3.3.10
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 83
European Patent Convention Art 56
Keywords

Sufficiency of disclosure - (yes)

Inventive step - (yes)

Inventive step - non-obvious alternative

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0939/92
Citing decisions
-

I. The opponent's appeal lies from the decision of the Opposition Division to reject its opposition under Article 101(2) EPC.

The appellant had opposed the patent under Article 100(a) EPC for lack of inventive step (Article 56 EPC) and Article 100(b) EPC for insufficient disclosure (Article 83 EPC).

In its decision the Opposition Division held that the claimed invention was sufficiently disclosed (Article 83 EPC) and that neither starting from D1 nor starting from D8 the claimed compounds and light emitting diodes were obviously derivable from the prior art (Article 56 EPC).

II. The following documents are referred to in this decision:

D1: |WO2006/122630 |

D2: |Organic Light Emitting Materials and Devices, Z. Li and H. Meng, CRC Press, 2007 chapter 3.4 "Hole transport materials"|

D3: |WO2011/116869 |

D4: |WO2006/108497 |

D5: |WO2011/006574 |

D8: |KR20110002156 |

D8b |English translation of D8 |

D13:|EP 2 502 908 A1 |

D14:|EP 2 364 980 A1 |

D15:|WO2011/133007 |

III. Independent claim 1 of the granted patent reads as follows:

"A compound for an organic optoelectronic device represented by a combination of the following Chemical Formula 1 and Formula 2:

FORMULA/TABLE/GRAPHIC

wherein, in the above Chemical Formulae 1 and 2,

X is -O-, -S-, -S(O)-, or -S(O)2-,

Ar**(1) to Ar**(4) are independently a substituted or unsubstituted C6 to C30 aryl group, or a substituted or unsubstituted C2 to C30 heteroaryl group,

L**(1) and L**(2) are independently a single bond, a substituted or unsubstituted C2 to C10 alkenylene group, a substituted or unsubstituted C2 to C10 alkynylene group, a substituted or unsubstituted C6 to C30 arylene group, or a substituted or unsubstituted C2 to C30 heteroarylene group,

ml and m2 are independently integers of 0 or 1, one of ml and m2 is 1,

n1 and n2 are independently integers ranging from 0 to 3,

R**(1) to R**(7) are independently hydrogen, deuterium, a substituted or unsubstituted C1 to C10 alkyl group, a substituted or unsubstituted C6 to C30 aryl group, or a substituted or unsubstituted C2 to C30 heteroaryl group, and

two *s of the above Chemical Formula 2 are bonded with the adjacent two *s of the above Chemical Formula 1 to form a fused ring."

Dependent claim 8 reads:

"The compound for an organic optoelectronic device of anyone of claims 1 to 7, wherein the compound for an organic optoelectronic device has triplet exciton energy (T1) of greater that or equal to about 2.0 eV."

Independent claims 10 and 15 are directed to devices containing compounds according to claim 1.

The wording of the claims of the auxiliary requests is irrelevant for the present decision.

IV. With its statement setting out the grounds of appeal and during further appeal proceedings the appellant (opponent) submitted essentially the following:

The decision of the Opposition Division to reject the opposition should be overturned. The claimed invention was not sufficiently disclosed, Article 83 EPC. In particular the claims covered compounds unsuitable for being used in organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs). Furthermore, the claims defined compounds by means of a parameter that has neither shown to be fulfilled nor to be measurable. Moreover, a skilled person could derive the claimed compounds and devices in an obvious manner from the prior art, starting either from D1 or from D8.

The appellant requested the decision of the Opposition Division to be set aside and the patent to be revoked.

V. With its reply to appeal and during further appeal proceedings the respondent (patentee) submitted essentially the following:

The decision of the Opposition Division was correct. The claimed invention was sufficiently disclosed. Furthermore, starting from either D1 or D8 the claimed compounds and devices were a non-obvious solution to the problem of providing alternative charge transport materials usable in organic electrooptic devices.

The respondent requested the appeal to be dismissed or, failing that, the patent to be maintained on the basis of any one of the following auxiliary requests:

auxiliary requests 1A and 1B, filed with letter dated 8 July 2022;

auxiliary requests 1 to 5, filed with letter dated 31 March 2022.

VI. The parties' arguments relevant for the present decision are dealt with in detail in the reasons for the decision below.

VII. With notification of 1 October 2021 the parties were summoned to oral proceedings. On 31 January 2022 the Board issued a communication pursuant to Article 15(1) RPBA 2020 in which the parties were informed about the issues to be discussed at oral proceedings as well as a provisional opinion of the Board on the disputed issues. In the preliminary opinion of the Board the Opposition Division's decision was correct.

VIII. Oral proceedings took place on 21 July 2022.

At the end of the oral proceedings the chairman announced the decision.

1. The appeal is admissible

2. Sufficiency of disclosure (Article 83 EPC)

2.1 The Opposition Division decided that the claimed invention is sufficiently disclosed (point 3 of the decision). The Board agrees, for the reasons set out below. The two lines of argumentation forwarded by the appellant are not convincing.

2.2 The first point the appellant raised relates to compounds having certain groups which may be substituted or unsubstituted, as defined in the claims. This applies in particular for the definitions of L**(1)/L**(2) and R**(1)-R**(7). In the appellant's view this definition also covers substituents making the compounds unsuitable for use in OLEDs, e. g. thermally labile or ionizable groups. Thus, in his view the claims cover non-working embodiments.

However, the patent discloses general formulae and many examples of suitable compounds. Also the meaning of "substituted" is defined in [0044] and [0045]. Individual non-working embodiments, as alleged by the appellant, are generally no proof of an insufficient disclosure of the invention as long as a skilled person knows how working embodiments can be obtained. This is clearly the case here.

Moreover, claim 1 of the patent relates to a compound "for an organic optoelectronic device". Hence, the claim covers only compounds which are suitable for being used in an organic optoelectronic device. Compounds which can be recognized by a skilled person to be unsuitable, such as the compounds bearing substituents mentioned in the appellant's argument, are not covered by the claims anyway.

2.3 Secondly, the appellant submitted that claim 8 lacked sufficient disclosure since the patent neither contained (i) any example of a compound having a triplet exciton energy (T1) of at least 2.0 eV nor (ii) any disclosure of how this parameter can be measured.

The Board notes that the patent states in [0083] that the compounds of the invention have a high T1 value of at least 2.0 eV. The appellant has provided neither technical arguments nor data showing that this is not the case. Determination of T1 energies by optical spectroscopy, e. g, by measuring the phosphorescence spectra, is general practise.

Thus, the appellant has not shown that a skilled person would be unable to obtain a compound as defined in claim 8.

2.4 The claimed invention is sufficiently disclosed.

3. Inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

3.1 The patent deals with compounds being useful in organic light emitting devices (OLEDs) and having emitting as well as charge transporting properties, see e. g. [0019] or [0083] of the patent. The compounds should have a high glass transition temperature to stabilize the amorphous state and avoid crystallisation, see [0085]. Thermal stability contributes to a higher life span, see [0063].

The claims are directed to compounds of the following structure:

FORMULA/TABLE/GRAPHIC

In this formula X is O or S and at least one of m1 and m2 is 1, so that the central spirofluorene has a condensed benzofuran/benzothiophene structure on one side and at least one arylamino substituent on the other side.

3.2 In the impugned decision D1 and D8 were cited as starting point for the inventive step analysis. Both these documents deal with charge transporting materials used in OLEDs. The compounds of D1 are said to have a high thermal stability leading to increased efficiency and life time of the OLEDS, see pages 30/31. Also the compounds of D8 are said to have these advantages, see [0081] to [0083] of the translation D8b. D8 specifically relates to the high glass transition temperature of the compounds disclosed therein, see [0083].

D1 as closest prior art

3.3 D1 discloses as structurally closest compound compound (64), having the following structure:

FORMULA/TABLE/GRAPHIC

The patent claims differ from compound (64) of D1 in that the triarylamino groups must be attached, possibly via the unsaturated spacers L**(1)/L**(2), to the part of the spirobifluorene not containing the condensed benzofurane moiety. The claims do not allow amino groups directly attached to the benzofurane condensed fluorene part.

This was undisputed.

3.4 No improvements re D1 have been established.

Thus, the technical problem to be solved starting from D1 was the provision of alternative compounds that could be used as charge transport materials used in OLEDs.

This was likewise undisputed; during oral proceedings the parties agreed on the problem being formulated as an alternative.

3.5 It was undisputed that this problem has been solved by the claimed compounds. The dispute is whether the claimed solution was obvious. Thus, it must be decided if a skilled person would have seen the claimed compounds as a solution to this problem, i. e. as an alternative charge transport material used in OLEDs.

The appellant presented different lines of arguments.

3.5.1 It was referred to D2. D2 is a textbook on OLEDs and contains a chapter dealing with hole transport materials. Compound (43) of D2 is presented as a hole transport material leading to high luminescent activities. Compound (43) has the following structure:

FORMULA/TABLE/GRAPHIC

In the appellant's view this compound showed that a skilled person knew that arylamino groups could also be directly attached to the spirobifluorene part while maintaining a substituent, in this case a t-butyl group, on the other ring. Such a basic structure was known to be suitable for the claimed purpose. A skilled person, looking for alternatives, would thus have modified compound (64) of D1 by attaching the amino groups at the part of the spirobifluorene not containing the condensed benzofurane moiety.

However, the Board considers this argument to be based on hindsight.

Apart from compound (64) in D1 none of the many other compounds disclosed in D1 or D2 has a condensed benzofurane moiety. The respondent submitted, and the Board agrees that a skilled person, when starting from compound (64) of D1 would have rather learnt from D2 that the benzofurane moiety is superfluous and could be left out. A skilled person is not taught by D2 that maintaining this moiety while changing the position of the arylamino substituents will lead to usable alternative structures.

3.5.2 The appellant argued that a skilled person knew from common general knowledge that it was enough for any compound to contain covalently linked spirobifluorene and triaryl amine units in order to be useful for applications in an OLED. It was referred to page 317 of D2 which states that spiro-shaped hole transport materials have been extensively studied and the spiro structure improves the thermal stability of the amorphous state. In addition to to compound (43) mentioned there it was referred to compound (32) of D5 and compound I-4-19 of D8.

However, from this passage in D2 it cannot be concluded that any compound having a spirobifluorene unit and arylamino groups attached thereto was suitable as a hole transport material. The nature of the covalent bonding and/or specific substitution patterns will generally influence the suitability of a compound for this purpose. Changing the electronic structure by modifying substituents influences the energy levels responsible for charge transport and emission. Applied to the present case, a skilled person would not have concluded from the disclosure of the D2, based on compounds differing in other parts of the molecule, that the positioning of the arylamino groups in the molecule is of no importance. That compound (43) is cited in other publications and has become a standard hole transport material, as brought forward by the appellant, does not change this assessment. Even if so, a skilled man would still not have arrived at the present claims when starting from Compound (64) of D1 and considering compound (43) of D2.

The appellant likewise referred to page 4, lines 15-26 of D3. In the appellant's view, this passage discloses the general usability of compounds having spirobifluorene skeleton and arylamino groups as hole transport layers in OLEDs. However, this passage clearly relates to the invention disclosed in D3; the respective compounds are defined at the beginning of the following page 5. D3 does not represent common general knowledge.

3.5.3 The appellant cited the decision T 939/92 for the present situation. The appellant argues that, since all cited documents relate to compounds useful in optoelectronic devices and show the structural elements of the claimed compounds the fact that the claimed ones also have such properties was by no means particular or surprising.

It is correct that T 939/92 held the provision of compounds without any particular properties, just for the enrichment of chemistry, to be routine work of a chemist and thus not to require any inventive activity.

However, in the present case the claimed compounds do have useful properties and are not just provided for the enrichment of chemistry. This situation is different to the situation underlying T 939/92. Unlike there, the present compounds need to be suitable for the claimed use. Thus, inventive step may not already be denied for the only reason that the compounds have the same, or similar, properties as the compounds disclosed in the prior art. Alternative solutions for the same technical problem may still be validly claimed, provided that they do not obviously result from the teaching of the prior art.

3.5.4 Thus, starting from D1 the claimed compounds are a non-obvious solution to the stated problem.

D8 as closest prior art

3.6 D8 discloses as structurally closest compound 1-4-19, having the following structure:

FORMULA/TABLE/GRAPHIC

The patent claims differ from compound 1-4-19 of D8 in that in the condensed fluorene part they require an oxygen or sulfur atom instead of the phenyl substituted nitrogen atom.

This was undisputed.

3.7 No improvements re D8 have been established.

Thus, the technical problem to be solved starting from D8 was the provision of alternative compounds that could be used as charge transport materials used in OLEDs.

This was likewise undisputed.

3.8 It was undisputed that this problem has been solved by the claimed compounds. The dispute is whether the claimed solution was obvious. Thus, it must be decided if a skilled person would have seen the claimed compounds as a solution to this problem, i. e. as an alternative charge transport materials used in OLEDs. Starting from D8 a skilled person would have had to replace the nitrogen atom in the condensed system by an oxygen or sulfur atom.

3.9 The appellant argued that the replacement of the nitrogen by oxygen or sulfur atoms was obvious from D8 itself as well as from other cited documents, like D1, D4 or D13-D15.

However, none of these documents shows the equivalence of condensed benzofuranes or benzothiophenes in aryl amino substituted systems as claimed with the indole structure of D8.

It is correct that according to claim 4 of D8 additional heteroatoms may be present, however, at least one nitrogen atom is obligatory, unlike in the present claims. In all other documents cited (compound 54 of D4, D13-15) the amino groups are located on the "wrong" part of the spirobifluorene structure. Compound 43 of D2, which was also referred to, is a spirobifluorene without any further condensation.

The appellant additionally referred to compounds 25/26 and 47/48 of D1, which have the following structure:

FORMULA/TABLE/GRAPHIC

FORMULA/TABLE/GRAPHIC

However, while these examples show that in certain structures oxygen atoms and arylamines are exchangeable, they do not relate to spirocondensed systems. This disclosure cannot simply be transferred to compound I-4-19 of D8.

Thus, the cited documents do not show an equivalence of the condensed indole of D8 and the claimed condensed benzofurane or benzothiophene compounds.

3.10 Also starting from D8 the claimed compounds are a non-obvious solution to the stated problem.

4. None of the grounds of opposition invoked by the appellant prejudices the maintenance of the patent as granted. The decision of the Opposition Division to reject the opposition under Article 101(2) EPC was correct. The respondent's auxiliary requests need not be addressed.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility