Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Find a professional representative
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • About the Observatory
      • Our activities
      • Our topics
      • Our partners and networks
      • Digital library
      • Data desk
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Patent filings
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Detailed methodology
            • Archive
          • Online Services
          • Patent information
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Innovation process survey
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Website
          • Survey on electronic invoicing
          • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
        • Culture Space A&T 5-10
          • Go back
          • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
            • Go back
            • aqua_forensic
            • LIMINAL
            • MaterialLab
            • Perfect Sleep
            • Proof of Work
            • TerraPort
            • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
            • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • The European Patent Journey
          • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
          • Next generation statements
          • Open storage
          • Cosmic bar
        • Lange Nacht 2023
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the Observatory
      • Our activities
      • Our topics
      • Our partners and networks
      • Digital library
      • Data desk
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t200639eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 0639/20 (Wind-farm optimisation/GENERAL ELECTRIC) 30-03-2023
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0639/20 (Wind-farm optimisation/GENERAL ELECTRIC) 30-03-2023

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2023:T063920.20230330
Date of decision
30 March 2023
Case number
T 0639/20
Petition for review of
-
Application number
15164911.8
IPC class
F03D 7/04
F03D 9/00
G05B 13/04
F03D 17/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 444.79 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Systems and methods for optimizing operation of a wind farm

Applicant name
General Electric Company
Opponent name
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy GmbH & Co. KG
Board
3.5.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 54
European Patent Convention Art 111(1)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art
Keywords

Novelty - main request (no): incorrect claim interpretation by the opposition division

Admittance of claim requests filed but not examined during the opposition proceedings - auxiliary requests 1 to 5 (yes)

Remittal - "special reasons" (yes): auxiliary requests not examined yet by the opposition division

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal of the opponent (appellant) is against the decision of the opposition division to reject the opposition.

The opposition division deemed that neither the opposition ground under Article 100(a) EPC nor the one under Article 100(b) EPC prejudiced the maintenance of the opposed patent. Given the opposition division's positive assessment of the claims as granted, none of the proprietor's five auxiliary requests filed during the opposition proceedings required consideration by the opposition division.

II. A communication was issued under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020 including the board's preliminary opinion concerning, amongst others, novelty (Article 54 EPC) having regard to the following prior-art document:

D2: US 2009/0099702 A1.

III. Oral proceedings before the board were held on 30 March 2023. The parties' final requests were as follows:

- The appellant requests that the appealed decision be set aside and that the patent be revoked.

- The proprietor (respondent) requests, as the main request, that the appeal be dismissed, i.e. that the patent be maintained as granted. In the alternative, the respondent requests that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of one of five auxiliary requests re-filed with the written reply to the appeal (auxiliary requests 1 to 5). These five auxiliary requests are identical to the five auxiliary requests mentioned in point I above.

At the end of the oral proceedings, the board's decision was announced.

IV. Claim 1 of the main request, i.e. claim 1 as granted, reads as follows (board's feature labelling):

A. "A method (200) for optimizing operation of a wind

farm (100), comprising:

(a) receiving (210) new values corresponding to at least some wake parameters for wind turbines (102) in the wind farm (100);

(b) identifying (212) new sets of interacting wind turbines (102) from the wind turbines (102) based on the new values;

(c) developing (214) a farm-level predictive wake model for the new sets of interacting wind turbines (102) based on the new values and historical wake models determined using historical values of the wake parameters corresponding to reference sets of interacting wind turbines (102) in the wind farm (100); and

(d) adjusting (216) one or more control settings for at least the new sets of interacting wind turbines (102) based on the farm-level predictive wake model;

(e) wherein the method (200) further comprises: continually monitoring the wake parameters for the wind turbines (102); and

(f) repeating the receiving, the identifying, the developing, and the adjusting when a change in a monitored value of one or more of the wake parameters is outside a corresponding threshold".

V. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 includes all the features of claim 1 of the main request and further includes, at the end, the following features (board's feature labelling):

(g) "receiving (202) the historical values of the

wake parameters corresponding to the wind

turbines prior to receiving the new values;

(h) identifying (204) the reference sets of the

interacting wind turbines from the wind

turbines based on the historical values; and

(i) determining (206) the one or more historical

wake models for the reference sets of

interacting wind turbines based on the

historical values corresponding to the reference

sets of interacting wind turbines,

wherein determining (206) the historical wake

models comprises fitting the historical values

corresponding to each of the reference

sets of interacting wind turbines (102) using a

regression-based model".

VI. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 includes all the features of claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 and further includes, at the end, the following feature (board's feature labelling):

(j) "wherein determining (206) the historical

wake models comprises computing a ratio of

downstream wind speed to upstream wind

speed as a function of wind direction at an

upstream wind turbine (102), relative

locations of upstream and downstream wind

turbines (102), and the one or more control

settings corresponding to the upstream wind

turbine using the regression-based model".

VII. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 includes all the features of claim 1 of the main request and further includes, at the end, the following feature (board's feature labelling):

(k) "wherein adjusting the control settings comprises

sequentially determining the control

settings for each of the new sets of interacting

wind turbines (102) positioned in the wind

farm (100) in a sparse tree structure such

that, at each positional level in the sparse

tree structure, a combined power output of the

wind turbines at that positional level and

preceding positional levels in the sparse tree

structure is maximized".

VIII. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 includes all the features of claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 and further includes, at the end, the following feature (board's feature labelling):

(l) "further comprising re-adjusting the control

settings for a subset of the wind turbines (102)

if the control settings determined for the

subset of the wind turbines (102) results

in a performance parameter that falls outside a

permissible limit specified for a wind speed

expected at the subset of wind turbines, wherein

readjusting the control settings comprises

sequentially determining the control settings

for each of the subset of wind turbines (102) in

a top-down manner".

IX. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 includes features A, (a) to (i), (k) and (l) in this order.

1. Technical background

1.1 The opposed patent relates to a wind farm, such as wind farm 100 having wind turbines 102 and rotor blades 104 (see Figure 1 reproduced below).

FORMULA/TABLE/GRAPHIC

1.2 The opposed patent particularly concerns wind-energy capture optimisation in such a wind farm. It aims to do so by maximising the wind farm's "annual energy production" while minimising negative effects such as the fatigue load on wind turbines 102. This (constrained) maximisation is supposed to output optimal control settings for wind turbines 102. Using these optimal control settings, rotor blades 104 may, for instance, be swivelled and aligned relative to the prevailing wind direction.

1.3 The constrained maximisation is based on "farm-level wake models" which involve "wake parameters". These parameters will typically include ambient conditions, geometrical layout of the wind farm and/or operational information of the wind turbines. According to the invention, some of these wake parameters, such as the ambient conditions, are continuously monitored, e.g. by monitoring devices 110. These monitored values are then used to identify aerodynamically interacting sets of wind turbines and to estimate corresponding (set-wise) wake interactions. The set-wise estimation of these wake interactions, in turn, would, according to the opposed patent, make it possible to generate the

farm-level wake models in real-time.

2. Main request: claim 1 - construction

Throughout the appeal proceedings, the parties have put a particular emphasis on the construction of features A, (b) to (d) and (f). The board construes these features as follows.

2.1 The board agrees with the respondent that the "optimizing" step according to feature A can relate to a plurality of goals. As the respondent correctly brought forward, the wind-farm operation optimisation according to the method of granted claim 1 could aim

- to increase the lifetime of wind turbines of the "wind farm" of feature A,

- to maximise the wind farm's energy output or

- to reduce the wind farm's maintenance.

Granted claim 1, however, does not specify any cost function, which the skilled reader would typically expect to be minimised and yield an optimised operation in the sense of feature A. As a result, granted claim 1 does not allow to identify which goal the "optimizing" step of this feature is directed to. Similar comments apply to the "farm-level predictive wake model" of features (c) and (d), about which granted claim 1 also specifies no details. The farm-level predictive wake model of these features is a mere "black box" that does not allow to draw any conclusion as to which of the wind farm's operational aspects are supposed to be optimised in the claimed method.

2.2 For the reasons set out in points 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 below, the board does not share the respondent's view that the meaning of features (b) and (d) is to be confined to a grouping, resulting in "sets", of wind turbines that interact with each other. Likewise, the respondent could not convince the board that feature (d) would require to adjust the control settings for these interacting wind turbines in a

set-wise way, rather than for each of the wind turbines individually. The board acknowledges that the first sentence of paragraph [0015] of the opposed patent mentions a "set-wise evaluation" in this respect, but no such evaluation is apparent from claim 1 as granted taken by itself.

2.2.1 In the board's view, feature (b) merely requires to identify, i.e. "to indicate", sets of interacting wind turbines, rather than to (actively) group these wind turbines with the purpose of adjusting their control settings "en masse" within a particular set. The board notes in this respect that the term "set" can refer to a "pair". The second sentence of paragraph [0045] of the opposed patent is, moreover, in line with this interpretation. This means that feature (b) can, within the wind farm of feature A, boil down to a mere identification of those pairs of wind turbines that are interacting under currently prevailing weather conditions.

2.2.2 Moreover, feature (d) is silent about whether the control settings are adjusted for the new sets of interacting wind turbines on an "individual basis", i.e. wind turbine per wind turbine, or whether the control settings are adjusted for all of the interacting wind turbines of a particular new set in one go.

2.3 The board holds that the phrase "developing a

farm-level predictive wake model" according to feature (c) can, in combination with feature (f), be taken to mean that, for each repetition in accordance with the latter feature, a new farm-level predictive wake model is "developed" in the sense that it is "generated" by the claimed method. For each repetition, this "new farm-level predictive wake model" could either be the same as before or could be a different one. The board acknowledges that, by virtue of feature (c), such generating would have to be "based on the new values" of the wake parameters. However, this does not necessarily mean that the mathematical function underlying the newly generated farm-level predictive wake model must depend, taken by itself, on all of these new values. This can be illustrated by an example which the respondent brought forward during the oral proceedings before the board. In this example, two farm-level predictive wake models were used in the claimed method, one for a dominant wind direction (e.g. "North") and another one for a secondary wind direction (e.g. "East"). If the wind changes from "North" to "East", feature (c) could result in a mere change of farm-level predictive wake model, without this model being explicitly dependent on the wind direction.

As an aside, the board observes that the opposed patent is not specific regarding the precise form of this mathematical function. The appellant correctly pointed out that the opposed patent discloses, at most, one single equation that may underlie the "farm-level predictive wake model" of feature (c), namely equation (1) indicated in paragraph [0049] of the opposed patent. The board emphasises that the term "others" in this equation (1) does not necessarily encompass all of the other wake parameters considered in the opposed patent. Moreover, the opposed patent is silent about how the different parameters mentioned in the argument of function f of equation (1) are actually weighted. In sum, the skilled reader would understand the "developing" step of feature (c) to encompass more than a mere "updating" in view of currently prevailing weather conditions as suggested by paragraphs [0049] to [0051] of the opposed patent.

2.4 The board further agrees with the respondent's interpretation of the term "reference sets of interacting wind turbines" of feature (c) as meaning "certain groupings of upstream and downstream turbines" in the sense that the interacting wind turbines comprised in these reference sets will typically involve one or more upstream wind turbines that impact the operation of at least one downstream wind turbine. The skilled reader would also readily understand from the expression "historical values of the wake parameters corresponding to reference sets of interacting wind turbines" according to feature (c) that these "reference sets" must relate to sets that have been determined previously, e.g. when calibrating the "wind farm" of feature A or as determined via the "identifying" step according to feature (b) in a previous iteration of the claimed method.

2.5 Regarding feature (f), the board does not agree with Reasons 12 of the appealed decision that the clause "when a change in a monitored value of one or more of the wake parameters is outside a corresponding threshold" necessarily means that the repeating step of feature (f) would take place only if this change is outside the corresponding threshold or when this change would be "significant".

In this respect, the respondent, on the one hand, convincingly argued that the interpretation of the term "when" can have a temporal as well as a causal aspect. The board holds that the interpretation of the term "when" in the sense of "while" fits within this temporal aspect. On the other hand, the board does not share the respondent's view as to how this clause would limit feature (f): the mere presence of this clause in feature (f) does not necessarily convey to the skilled reader that the "threshold" could not be chosen arbitrarily. Granted claim 1 is, after all, silent about which value to attribute to this threshold. It does, in particular, not mandatorily require to set this threshold to 5% as suggested by the respondent based on paragraph [0054] of the opposed patent.

The skilled reader would, in the board's view, readily understand that this "threshold" according to feature (f) determines the sensitivity of the repetitive scheme underlying granted claim 1: a value close to zero means a high sensitivity to changes in the monitored value according to feature (f), whereas a high value represents a low sensitivity, i.e. a more robust scheme.

The skilled reader could, in fact, even eliminate the repetition involved in feature (f) altogether. It would make technical sense for the skilled reader to do so, for instance, when performing a test run of the claimed optimisation method. The respondent correctly argued in this respect that any method for optimising the operation of a wind farm will typically consist of several stages. The time lapse between these stages is not necessarily stringently defined. In one scenario, it could be that, in a first "initial-test" stage, the wind turbines of a particular wind farm are operated with a first set of wake parameters underlying the "farm-level predictive wake model" of feature (c). The board concurs with the respondent that such an "initial-test" stage may last for several weeks and that it can be used

- to gather data on, for instance, blade fouling,

- to perform sensor calibration or

- to study corrosion.

To allow for technically meaningful test results within such a scenario, the skilled reader would, in the board's view, readily choose the "threshold" of feature (f) to be sufficiently high. In this way, the change in the monitored value of any of the wake parameters would always be below this threshold and the control settings would remain the same for a sufficiently long period. The board therefore does not agree with the respondent that a high threshold would be contrary to the purpose of the claimed method to optimise a wind-farm operation.

3. Main request: claim 1 - novelty

3.1 The board holds that paragraphs [0004], [0006], [0008], [0028] and [0030] to [0036] as well as Figure 5 of document D2 indeed disclose features A and (a) to (f) of present claim 1.

3.2 The respondent questioned the disclosure of features (b) to (d) and (f) by document D2. The board makes the following comments in that regard:

3.2.1 In particular, feature (b) is disclosed in paragraph [0033] of D2 in view of three clauses, namely (emphasis added in all three clauses):

- "[t]he second component of the algorithm determines which upstream turbine 12 causes a wake";

- "[a]ny upstream turbine 12 that does not cause a wake that impacts a downstream turbine 14 will not be adjusted";

- "[t]he sequence of turbines to be switched is also determined by the algorithm".

These clauses necessarily imply the identification of new sets of interacting wind turbines. Otherwise, the wake optimisation algorithm shown in paragraphs [0032] to [0035] of D2 could not recognise which turbines need to be adjusted and in which sequence this should occur.

The board was not convinced by the respondent's argument that the "set-wise analysis" according to paragraph [0015] of the opposed patent differed from what the respondent referred to as the "classical analysis" of paragraph [0033] of D2. This is because the first two sentences of this latter paragraph identify those downstream wind turbines 14 that are affected by the wake of a particular upstream wind turbine 12. In agreement with the board's construction of feature (b) as explained in point 2.2.1 above, this means that "new sets of interacting wind turbines" are likewise identified in the system of D2.

3.2.2 Feature (c) is shown by the wake optimisation algorithm described in paragraphs [0032] to [0035] and illustrated by Figure 5 of D2. The latter unequivocally teaches in combination with paragraph [0034] of D2 calculating new turbine settings based on a look-up table which is based on inputs such as "ambient wind conditions" and "turbine operating parameters". These inputs are in turn continuously measured and (at least partly) predicted as set out in paragraphs [0028] and [0031] of D2. The new turbine settings allow "to increase overall windpark [i.e. farm-level] energy capture", as is apparent from paragraph [0034] of D2. The board holds that this look-up table is the place where the "farm-level predictive wake model" underlying D2's wake optimisation algorithm is stored. This is similar to how "historical wake models" are stored according to paragraph [0052] of the opposed patent. Moreover, the "look-up table" according to paragraph [0034] of D2 is updated in an iterative fashion. By definition, an iterative approach calculates new values of a particular parameter (set) based on previous values of this parameter (set). The skilled reader would thus understand that the iterations in D2 must correspond to different cycles of executing the wake optimisation algorithm in which the meteorological and turbine operating conditions, i.e. the "wake parameters" of features (a) and (c), are continuously detected as explained in paragraph [0031] of D2. It would further be immediately apparent for the skilled reader that, during normal operation, only a sub-set of the look-up table's inputs will have to be updated during a particular cycle. As a result, in each cycle, the look-up table will be based on "new values" and on "historical values of the wake parameters". The latter constitute, by virtue of being stored in the look-up table, "historical wake models" which were determined during the previous cycles of the iterative approach. These previous cycles must, again by definition of an iterative approach, have identified their own sets of interacting wind turbines as set out in paragraph [0033] of D2, which correspond to the "reference sets" of feature (c) as construed in point 2.4 above. It goes without saying that these reference sets will include "historical values of the wake parameters" associated with them. These historical values will, in turn, determine "historical wake models" according to feature (c).

The respondent contested that the term "iterative fashion" of the last sentence of paragraph [0034] of D2 would necessarily involve a calculation of new values based on previous values. Rather, in the respondent's view, this term was to be construed, on the basis of the Merriam-Webster dictionary and within the context of D2, as a mere "repetition" without any renewed identification of "sets of interacting wind turbines". The respondent concluded that D2 did not directly and unambiguously disclose the "reference sets" of feature (c).

The board is not convinced that the skilled reader would indeed consider the terms "iterative" and "repetitive" to be equivalent, even if the notorious "man in the street" would arguably do so. This is because the skilled reader from the field of optimisation algorithms such as the algorithm disclosed in paragraphs [0032] to [0034] of D2 would have no doubt that the former term comprises the connotation of obtaining successively closer approximations to the solution of a particular problem, which the latter term does not have. Moreover, it would also not make any technical sense for the skilled reader to simply repeat the three components of the wake optimisation algorithm of paragraphs [0032] to [0034] of D2 for each and every change in the meteorological (i.e. ambient-wind) conditions and wind-turbine operating parameters that play a role in that wake optimisation algorithm. For instance, if a downstream wind turbine's operating status is changed from not running to running, the skilled reader would immediately understand that the second component of the wake optimisation algorithm need not be repeated for each and every wind turbine of the wind farm. Rather, it would be unequivocal for the skilled reader that only those upstream wind turbines 12 that could cause a wake impacting the now running downstream wind turbine will be identified to form part of the new sets of interacting wind turbines. All other sets of interacting wind turbines which are not affected by switching on the downstream wind turbine would remain the same as determined before this switching on. Therefore, the skilled reader would immediately dismiss the respondent's interpretation of the term "iterative" as an academic rather than a practical one. Therefore, D2 in fact discloses the "developing" step according to feature (c) in the same sense of "updating" as defined in paragraphs [0049] to [0051] of the opposed patent (cf. the last paragraph of point 2.3 above).

3.2.3 Furthermore, feature (d) is palpably disclosed in paragraphs [0030], [0031] and [0034] of D2.

3.2.4 Lastly, feature (f) is also disclosed by virtue of the "iterative fashion" according to paragraph [0034] of D2. As apparent from the term "turbine operating parameters" in the penultimate sentence of this paragraph, this iterative update is triggered, for instance, if there is a discrete change in the wind-turbine operating status, e.g. from running to not running or vice versa. Such a discrete change will evidently be outside of some non-zero value. The board also notes, for the sake of completeness, that the "repeating" step according to feature (f) is not necessarily performed and therefore does not necessarily limit the claimed method under all circumstances that would occur to the skilled reader (cf. the last two paragraphs of point 2.5 above).

3.3 Hence, the board agrees with the appellant that claim 1 as granted lacks novelty (Article 54 EPC), contrary to the opposition division's conclusions.

4. Auxiliary requests 1 to 5: admittance

4.1 The appealed decision was not based on auxiliary requests 1 to 5 within the meaning of Article 12(2) RPBA 2020 ("on which the decision under appeal was based") for the simple reason that the opposition division rejected the opposition, i.e. allowed the respondent's higher-ranking main request (cf. appealed decision, point 7). Therefore, the respondent was supposed to demonstrate that these requests were admissibly filed and maintained in the proceedings before the opposition division (Article 12(4), first sentence, RPBA 2020). If this is done, these auxiliary requests form part of the appeal proceedings and cannot be regarded as an "amendment". Moreover, Article 12(3) RPBA 2020 requires that the written reply to the appeal contains the respondent's "complete appeal case" and specifies "expressly all the requests relied on".

4.2 In the case in hand, however, the respondent did not make any submissions to that effect in its written reply to the appeal. Only in its response to the board's preliminary opinion under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020 did the respondent address that matter by contesting the board's discretion not to admit auxiliary requests 1 to 5 (letter of 3 March 2023, pages 4 to 6). Therefore, the five auxiliary requests on file are to be regarded as "amendments", and may be admitted only at the discretion of the board (Article 12(4) RPBA 2020).

4.3 Given that, in the present case, the board is convinced without any burden that the respondent indeed admissibly filed and maintained the present auxiliary requests during the opposition proceedings (albeit not demonstrated with the written reply to the statement of grounds of appeal), and since the fact that the opposition division did not need to examine and decide upon those requests cannot be imputed to the respondent (cf. point I above), it seems to be just and fair to admit them into the proceedings.

4.4 Hence, the board decided to admit auxiliary requests 1 to 5 into the appeal proceedings (Article 12(4), second sentence, RPBA 2020).

5. Remittal of the case to the opposition division

5.1 Given the extensive claim construction conducted during the appeal proceedings (which deviated substantially from that of the appealed decision), the respondent favoured a remittal of the case to the opposition division. The opposition division could then, in the respondent's view, decide upon the case using the claim construction as adopted by the board (see points 2.1 to 2.5 above). Also, further prior-art documents on file may potentially become relevant for the assessment of novelty and/or inventive step as regards auxiliary requests 1 to 5.

5.2 The appellant had no objections against a remittal to the opposition division.

5.3 In view of the above, it is justified to remit the case to the opposition division, so that the latter may assess the allowability of auxiliary requests 1 to 5 first. In that context, the board only adds that, where Article 56 EPC is considered in that assessment, it could in particular be relevant, for establishing which technical effect e.g. feature (k) credibly achieves over the whole claimed scope, to determine how the skilled reader would construe the term "sparse tree structure" used therein and to which extent this term is indeed reflected in Figure 3 of the opposed patent.

5.4 Hence, "special reasons" present themselves for remitting the case to the opposition division for further prosecution (Article 11 RPBA 2020 and Article 111(1) EPC).

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the opposition division for further prosecution.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility