European Patent Office

T 0493/88 (Spacer grid) of 13.12.1989

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1989:T049388.19891213
Date of decision
13 December 1989
Case number
T 0493/88
Petition for review of
-
Application number
81400060.0
IPC class
G21C 3/34
Language of proceedings
French
Distribution
No distribution (D)
Download
-
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
-
Applicant name
CEA-FRAMATOME
Opponent name
Siemens
Board
3.4.01
Headnote

1. Under the provisions of Articles 101(1) and 102(2) EPC, an Opposition Division cannot validly hold that an opposition must be rejected until it has assured itself that none of the grounds for opposition listed in Article 100 EPC preclude the maintenance of the European patent at issue. It may not confine its examination merely to the grounds expressly mentioned in the notice of opposition but must examine the facts of its own motion in accordance with Article 114(1) EPC.

2. A decision of an Opposition Division rejecting the opposition is not correctly reasoned within the meaning of the first sentence of Rule 68(2) EPC if, after giving the reasons why the Opposition Division, unlike the opponent, considers the subject- matter of the patent to be new, it fails to state the reasons why it considers that the subject-matter also involves an inventive step.

Keywords
Insufficiently reasoned decision
Examination of the opposition
Scope of the powers of Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal
Examination by the EPO of its own motion
Catchword
-
Cited cases
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the Opposition Division for further prosecution.

3. The fee for appeal shall be reimbursed.