T 0549/95 (Piperidino substituent/PILKINGTON) of 15.01.2002
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T054995.20020115
- Date of decision
- 15 January 2002
- Case number
- T 0549/95
- Online on
- 25 February 2002
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 87303819.4
- IPC class
- G03C 1/73
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Distributed to board chairmen (C)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Photochromic articles
- Applicant name
- PILKINGTON PLC
- Opponent name
- Optische Werke G. Rodenstock
- Board
- 3.3.06
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 54 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973European Patent Convention Art 104(1) 1973
- Keywords
- Novelty (yes) - no unambiguous disclosure in the relevant prior art document; alleged falsity of formula not convincingly proved
Inventive step (yes) - no suggestion in the prior art
Apportionment of costs (refused - necessity to clarify arguments in a further hearing - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
- Citing cases
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The request for apportionment of costs is refused.