Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Find a professional representative
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t950841eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 0841/95 13-06-1996
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 0841/95 13-06-1996

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1996:T084195.19960613
Date of decision
13 June 1996
Case number
T 0841/95
Petition for review of
-
Application number
92110113.5
IPC class
B01L 3/02
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN AND MEMBERS (B)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 500.32 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Method of aspirating and dispensing a liquid using a self- cleaning pipette tip

Applicant name
Johnson & Johnson Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.
Opponent name
-
Board
3.4.02
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 84 1973
Keywords
Claims - clarity - yes (after amendments)
Catchword
Where a claim for an apparatus seeks to define the invention by reference to features of the use to which the apparatus is to be put, a lack of clarity can result. However, if the subject- matter of the application is an apparatus and it is not viable to define the apparatus in a way other than with reference to said use, an apparatus claim directed to a combination of apparatus and use defining unambiguously the apparatus can be clear (cf. the Guidelines, C-III.4.8a).
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
T 0181/96
T 1001/97

I. European patent application No. 92 110 113.5 (publication No. 0 519 390) was refused on the grounds that the only submitted independent claim, reading as follows, lacked clarity:

"1. A self cleaning pipette tip to be used in aspirating and dispensing a liquid having a surface tension Sigma and a mass density Rho, the pipette tip comprising:

a wall shaped to define a confining chamber about an axis of symmetry; means in said wall defining an aperture fluidly connected to said chamber, said means including a terminal surface of said wall having a generally circular shape with a radius R0 centered on said axis, characterized in that R0 satisfies the equation

(I) R0 < (Sigma/Rho g)1/2 where

Sigma = the surface tension of the liquid, Rho = the mass density of the liquid and g = the gravitational constant of 980 cm/sec2, the exterior shape of said wall as it extends from said terminal surface a distance that at least exceeds R0, being constantly changing such that the rate of change of the curve's distance z along said axis from said terminal surface with respect to the rate of change of the curve's distance r from said axis, follows the equation

(II) dz/dr < (Sigma 2 / (Rho g r2)2 - 1)1/2 where dz/dr is the derivative of z with respect to r, which is the local slope of the exterior surface."

II. The Examining Division took the view that the expression "to be used in" did not limit the claimed product itself because no structural limitation was implied thereby; "Sigma" and "Rho" are variables which concern only the liquid to be handled with the pipette tip; for the same pipette tip, the conditions of claim 1 will be met or not depending only on the liquid to be handled, i.e. its use; protection being sought for the pipette tip itself and not its use, this is not acceptable. Indeed, the claimed pipette tip cannot be regarded as different from an identical pipette tip just because of possible different conditions of use; in fact the invention does not concern a defined pipette tip geometry but the choice of conditions concerning a pipette tip geometry in function of conditions of its use and this constitutes a method. Therefore, claim 1 was not clear.

III. According to said decision, another independent claim, which reads as follows and which was part of the text of the patent application which had been officially accepted for grant of a patent in a former step of the examination procedure, was allowable:

"4. A method of aspirating and dispensing a liquid using a pipette tip comprising: a wall shaped to define a confining chamber about an axis of symmetry; means in said wall defining an aperture fluidly connected to said chamber, said means including a terminal surface of said wall having a generally circular shape with a radius R0 centered on said axis, characterized in that R0 satisfies the equation

(I) R0 < (Sigma/Rho g)1/2 and

Sigma = the surface tension of the liquid, Rho = the mass density of the liquid and g = the gravitational constant of 980 cm/sec2, the exterior shape of said wall as it extends from said terminal surface a distance that at least exceeds R0, being constantly changing such that the rate of change of the curve's distance z along said axis from said terminal surface with respect to the rate of change of the curve's distance r from said axis, follows the equation

(II) dz/dr < (Sigma 2 / (Rho g r2)2 - 1)1/2

where dz/dr is the derivative of z with respect to r, which is the local slope of the exterior surface."

Moreover, according further to said decision, an independent claim could possibly also concern "a method of manufacture of a self cleaning pipette tip to be used in aspirating and dispensing a liquid having a surface tension Sigma and a mass density Rho".

IV. The appellant (applicant) lodged an appeal against this decision and filed in particular a main request comprising 9 claims, whereby claim 1 differs from claim 1 having formed the basis of the decision under appeal only by substituting the words "suitable for use" for "to be used" in the beginning of the claim, claim 4 is a second independent claim identical with the claim which had been mentioned as allowable in said same decision, and the third and last independent claim, i.e. claim 7, reads as follows:

"7. A method of manufacture of a self cleaning pipette tip to be used in aspirating and dispensing a liquid having a surface tension Sigma and a mass density Rho, the method comprising forming the pipette tip with: a wall shaped to define a confining chamber about an axis of symmetry; means in said wall defining an aperture fluidly connected to said chamber, said means including a terminal surface of said wall having a generally circular shape with a radius R0 centered on said axis, characterized in that R0 satisfies the equation

(I) R0 < (Sigma/Rho g)1/2 where

Sigma = the surface tension of the liquid, Rho = the mass density of the liquid and g = the gravitational constant of 980 cm/sec2, the exterior shape of said wall as it extends from said terminal surface a distance that at least exceeds R0, being constantly changing such that the rate of change of the curve's distance z along said axis from said terminal surface with respect to the rate of change of the curve's distance r from said axis, follows the equation

(II) dz/dr < (Sigma 2 / (Rho g r2)2 - 1)1/2

where dz/dr is the derivative of z with respect to r, which is the local slope of the exterior surface."

V. The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside, that a patent be granted on the basis of, in particular, the main request, and that oral proceedings be organized if said main request were not accepted. Moreover, it submitted the following arguments in support of its main request:

It is a pipette tip which is the subject-matter of the present application and it is best protected by a product claim. It is not viable to define the pipette tip in a way other than with reference to the liquid to be aspired and dispensed; the shape of the pipette tip is defined by the parameters of the liquid to enable the pipette tip to be self-cleaning. For the same pipette tip, the conditions of present claim 1 will be met or not depending only on the liquid to be handled, i.e. the pipette tip will have the shape defined by the parameters of the liquid and thus be suitable for aspirating and dispensing said liquid, or not. Therefore, the product claim is clear.

In order to provide suitable protection for the invention, two independent method claims, corresponding in scope to the product claim, are included, which concern a method of use and a method of manufacture.

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. Main request

2.1. Allowability of the amendments

Present claim 1 differs from claim 1 having formed the basis of the decision under appeal and which had not been objected having regard to unallowable extension of subject-matter only by substituting the words "suitable for use" for "to be used" in the beginning of the claim, thereby reading "suitable for use in aspirating and dispensing a liquid". With respect to this amendment, it is to be noted that, according to indications in a part of the Guidelines referred to in the decision under appeal (see paragraph C-III-4.8, and more in particular the first sentence), if a claim commences with such words as: "Apparatus for carrying out the process etc....", this must be construed as meaning merely apparatus suitable for carrying out the process. Thus, no difference of meaning results from this amendment. Indeed, a device "to be used" in aspirating and dispensing a liquid is implicitly "suitable for use" in aspirating and dispensing a liquid. Moreover, present independent claim 4 is identical with a main claim having been found allowable by the Examining Division, and present independent claim 7 corresponds to a claim for a method of manufacture which had been mentioned as allowable in the decision under appeal. The Board being satisfied in this respect, it is considered that the claims have not been amended in such a way that the European patent application contains subject-matter which extends beyond the content of the application as filed (Art. 123(2) EPC).

2.2. Unity of invention

Lack of unity of invention has not been objected by the Examining Division. Thus, since the claims of the present main request are correctly based on the original disclosure, the appellant's arguments concerning the unity of invention are accepted (Art. 82 EPC).

2.3. Clarity and conciseness of the independent claims

2.3.1. The Examining Division has argued that, in fact, the invention does not concern a defined pipette tip geometry but the choice of conditions concerning a pipette tip geometry in function of conditions of its use and this constitutes a method. It is to be noted that the present main request also comprises method claims, in particular the independent claims 4 and 7. Claim 4 is identical with the claim which the Examining Division had officially mentioned as being allowable. Claim 7 is of the same type as the claim which had been suggested as allowable in the decision under appeal. Therefore, since no clarity deficiency has been detected, the Board of appeal is satisfied that these claims 4 and 7 are clear in the sense of Article 84 EPC.

2.3.2. However, as convincingly argued by the appellant, it is a pipette tip which is directly derivable as being the subject-matter of the present application (see for instance the drawings); such a pipette tip being a product, the appellant's argument that it is best protected by a product claim can already be accepted for reasons of consistency. Moreover, although a method of using such a pipette tip or a method of manufacture of such a pipette tip are also derivable from the application and even if categories of claims others than product claims can contribute to provide an adequate protection for the invention, it is the applicant's right and responsibility to define the protection which it considers adequate (Art. 113(2) EPC). Indeed, the pipette tip as such can be deprived of protection if no submitted corresponding product claim can satisfy the requirements of the Convention, that in particular the claims shall be clear, i.e. that they adequately define the matter for which protection is sought (Art. 84 EPC). The following is to be noted in this respect:

2.3.2.1. It is directly derivable from the whole application that the pipette tip geometry is in function of conditions of its use and, in particular, "Sigma" and "Rho" are variables which concern only the liquid to be handled with the pipette tip, i.e. its use. For the same pipette tip, the conditions of claim 1 will be met or not depending only on the liquid to be handled, i.e. its use. Indeed, as objected by the Examining Division having regard to a claim which did not substantially differ in meaning from the present claim 1, said claim does not comprise structural limitations of the features or parts of the pipette tip. However, as convincingly argued by the appellant, it is not viable to define the pipette tip in a way other than with reference to the liquid to be aspired and dispensed; the shape of the pipette tip is defined by the parameters of the liquid to enable the pipette tip to be self-cleaning. For the same pipette tip, the conditions of present claim 1 will be met or not depending only on the liquid to be handled, i.e. the pipette tip will have the shape defined by the parameters of the liquid and thus be a self cleaning pipette tip suitable for aspirating and dispensing said liquid, or not. Thus, for any given liquid, two same pipette tips meet the same conditions, or not. Therefore, there is no ambiguity in this sense.

2.3.2.2. In this respect, it is to be noted that, in the decision under appeal, it is referred, "if necessary", to the Guidelines, and in particular to paragraph C-III-4.8a. According to said paragraph of the Guidelines, where a claim for an apparatus seeks to define the invention by reference to features of the use to which the apparatus is to be put, a lack of clarity can result. This implies that lack of clarity does not automatically arise in such a case.

Moreover, in said same paragraph of the Guidelines, a claim reading "A box for storing magnetic cassettes on end, characterised in that the stored cassettes project beyond the upper edges of the box to facilitate removal" is mentioned as being unclear since, though directed to a box, it defines not a box per se but its relationship to the cassettes. In this sense, this concerns present claim 1, wherein there is a relation between parameters of the pipette tip such as dimensions or shapes thereof, on the one hand, and parameters of the liquid, on the other hand. However, according to said same paragraph of the Guidelines, such a claim for a box for storing cassettes must either make clear the size of the box, if desired by defining the size of the cassettes, or must be directed to a combination of box and cassettes, e.g. "A storage box containing magnetic tape cassettes on end...". Yet, contrary to this example cited in the Guidelines, it is not possible in the present case to define the same parameter (for instance the size) for the pipette tip and the liquid, because there can be seen no adequate same parameter for a pipette tip, which substantially keeps its shape, and a liquid, which is fluid. Moreover, the second condition mentioned in said paragraph of the Guidelines is met in the present claim, which indeed is directed to a combination of pipette tip and liquid. Thus, already for this reason, no lack of clarity results.

2.3.2.3. Incidentally, it is to be noted that present claim 1, where the apparatus, i.e. the pipette tip is defined by reference to features of the use to which said pipette tip is to be put, does not differ substantially from other types of claims wherein features of a device are determined, for instance implicitly, by the use to which said device is to be put. An example is indeed also derivable from another paragraph of the Guidelines (see C-III-4.8) which, as mentioned here above, is also referred to in the decision under appeal and wherein a claim reading "A hook for a crane" implies e.g. particular dimensions and strength in the hook, i.e. features of the use to which the hook is to be put. However, there is no indication in the Guidelines that such a claim should lack clarity.

2.3.2.4. Therefore, present claim 1 is clear in the sense of Article 84 EPC.

2.3.3. Incidentally, it is to be noted that claims 1, 4 and 7 concern different categories of claims and, thus, they satisfy the requirement of conciseness of Article 84 EPC.

2.3.4. It is to be noted that some of the dependent claims, in particular the dependent method claims, do not refer back correctly to corresponding independent claims, and that this shall have to be corrected.

2.4. Novelty and inventive step

As mentioned here above, it is derivable from the communications of the Examining Division and from the decision under appeal that the subject-matter of each of present claims 4 and 7 is novel in the sense of Article 54 EPC and involves an inventive step in the sense of Article 56 EPC. No objection concerning the patentability of an apparatus claim has been made during the examination procedure. Since in particular the method of claim 4 of aspirating and dispensing a liquid using a pipette tip wherein all the mentioned features concern the pipette tip itself and no particular feature concern the method itself has been declared to involve an inventive step, it is derivable that, in the view of the Examining Division, the pipette tip with its device features was not obvious having regard to the prior art and, thus, the subject-matter of present claim 1 also involves an inventive step in the sense of Article 56 EPC. The Board being satisfied in this respect, the independent claims 1, 4 and 7, as well as claims 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9. as dependent, are considered allowable (Art. 52(1) EPC).

2.5. Since the appellant's main request is allowable, it is not necessary to consider the text of the claims of its auxiliary requests or to take into account its auxiliary request for oral proceedings.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the Examining Division with the order to grant a patent on the basis of the claims Nos. 1 to 9 filed with appellant's letter of 18. September 1995 (notice of appeal and statement of grounds of appeal), with the dependent claims, the description and, if necessary, the drawings to be adapted.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility