Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • Searching Asian documents: patent search and monitoring services
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet and OPS
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge

    UP search

    Learn about the Unitary Patent in patent knowledge products and services

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Find a professional representative
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Unitary Patent

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National law relating to the UP
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives

    legal text

    Legal texts

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2022 ceremony
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Green tech in focus
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    Listen to our podcast

  • Learning

    Learning

    The e-Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • Professional hub
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by area by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)

    European Patent Academy

    Boost your IP knowledge with (e-)training from the European Patent Academy

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • A glimpse of the planned activities
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Public consultation on the EPO's Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Social responsibility
      • Overview
      • Environment and sustainability
      • Art collection
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s

    about us

    Patent Index 2022

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • Searching Asian documents
      • EP full-text search
      • Bibliographic coverage in Espacenet and OPS
      • Full-text coverage in Espacenet
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • BG - Federated Register Service
            • GB - Federated Register Service
            • NL - Federated Register Service
            • MK - Federated Register Service
            • ES - Federated Register Service
            • GR - Federated Register Service
            • SK - Federated Register Service
            • FR - Federated Register Service
            • MT - Federated Register Service
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Searching Asian documents
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Patent insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
          • Go back
          • EBD files (weekly download) - free of charge
            • Go back
            • Secure EBD ST.36 files (weekly download) - for national patent offices only
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
        • EP full-text data for text analytics
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here? Patent information explained.
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Unitary Patent Guide
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot
        • MyEPO Portfolio - pilot phase
        • Online Filing 2.0 pilot continuation
        • Exchange data with us using an API
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Installation and activation
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
      • Tutorials
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • EPC Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Guidelines revision cycle
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • Watch the 2023 ceremony
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • Activities granted in 2023
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • CodeFest on Green Plastics
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • IP and youth
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European Patent Academy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning Paths
    • Professional hub
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Pre-examination
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent enforcement in Europe
        • Patent litigation in Europe
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventors' handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Is the idea ‘obvious’?
            • Prior art searching
            • Professional patent searching
            • Simple Espacenet searching
            • What is prior art?
            • Why is novelty important?
          • Competition and market potential
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Research guidelines
          • Assessing the risk ahead
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Exploitation routes
            • Significant commercial potential
            • Significant novelty
            • What about you?
            • What if your idea is not novel but does have commercial potential?
          • Proving the invention
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Help with design or redesign
            • Prototype strategy
          • Protecting your idea
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Forms of IPR
            • Patenting strategy
            • The patenting process
          • Building a team and seeking funding
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Building a team
            • Sources of funding
            • Sources of help for invention
          • Business planning
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Constructing a business plan
            • Keep it short!
          • Finding and approaching companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • First contact
            • Meetings
          • Dealing with companies
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Advance or guaranteed payment
            • Companies and your prototype
            • Full agreement – and beyond
            • Negotiating a licensing agreement
            • Reaching agreement
            • Royalties
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For IP professionals
          • For business decision-makers
          • For stakeholders of the innovation ecosystem
        • IP clinics
      • EQE Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Coffee-break questions
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Governance
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • About eTendering
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Social responsibility
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environment
      • Art collection
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • The collection
        • Let's talk about art
        • Artists
        • Media library
        • What's on
        • Publications
        • Contact
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Procedure
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Organisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition of the Presidium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Archive
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2023
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Publications
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
    • Case Law from the Contracting States to the EPC
    • Oral proceedings
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Legal resources
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
      • Specific contact
      • Surveys
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Search services
        • Examination services, final actions and publication
        • Opposition services
        • Patent filings
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Archive
        • Online Services
        • Patent information
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Innovation process survey
        • Customer services
        • Filing services
        • Website
        • Survey on electronic invoicing
        • Companies innovating in clean and sustainable technologies
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Forums
    • Glossary
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2023 decisions
  • 2022 decisions
  • 2021 decisions
https://www.epo.org/en/node/t960245eu1
  1. Home
  2. T 0245/96 04-08-1998
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

T 0245/96 04-08-1998

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1998:T024596.19980804
Date of decision
04 August 1998
Case number
T 0245/96
Petition for review of
-
Application number
91105320.5
IPC class
F16H 57/02
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 704.74 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Transmission series

Applicant name
Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd, et al
Opponent name

Sew-Eurodrive GmbH & Co

Deutsche Babcock Aktiengesellschaft

Board
3.2.01
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
Keywords
Claim 1 (main request), novelty and inventive step (yes)
Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0001/91
Citing decisions
-

I. The respondent is the proprietor of European patent No. 0 452 739 (application No. 91 105 320.5).

II. The patent was opposed by the appellants (opponents) 01 and 02 on the grounds that its subject-matter lacked novelty and/or inventive step with respect to the state of the art (Article 100(a) EPC). The opposition was based on alleged prior uses according to

Enclosure 2(01) ("Anlage 2, 09.05.1995", filed by opponent 01) representing a matrix composed of 9 pairs of gearwheels selected from the opponent's catalogues and data sheets;

Table 2(02) ("Tafel 2", filed by opponent 02 on 19 June 1995) representing a matrix composed of 16 pairs of gearwheels selected from the opponent's catalogue.

Each prior use was supported by filed evidence such as catalogues, technical data sheets, letters of correspondence, delivery notes, invoices, technical drawings and the addresses of persons to be called as witnesses.

In addition the opponents also filed the following prior art documents:

"SEW-EURODRIVE, Handbuch der Antriebstechnik", München, Wien 1980, pages 224 to 229 (cited as Enclosure 4(01), "Anlage 4, 09.05.1995");

"Deutsche Normen, DIN 780, Teil 1, 2; May 1977 (3 pages, cited as Enclosure B1(01), "Anlage B1, 09.05.1995").

III. With its decision posted 25 January 1996, the Opposition Division rejected the opposition.

IV. Appeals against this decision were filed on 12 March 1996 (appellant 02) and on 21 March 1996 (appellant 01) and the fees for appeal were paid at the same time. The statements of grounds of appeal were filed on 28 May 1996 (appellant 02) and 29 May 1996 (appellant 01).

In their statements of appeal and also in later filed letters the appellants referred to the following further papers and a model all being evidence concerning the prior uses (as advanced in the opposition procedure):

Enclosure 12(01) (filed 29.05.96):

model ("Ritzel-/Rädersatz") with a base plate on which are arranged, in the form of a matrix, 16 pairs of gearwheels selected from the filed catalogues and data sheets;

Enclosure 15(01) and 16(01) ("Anlage 15 and 16", filed 29.05.96):

figures with graphic representations and matrices M2 and M1 each composed of 16 pairs of gearwheels selected from the filed catalogues and data sheets;

Enclosure 17(01) ("Anlage 17", filed 29.05.96):

graphic representation of the pairs of gearwheels as selected for the matrices M1 and M2 and arranged similarly as shown in Figure 3 of the patent in suit;

Table 2'(02), filed 28.05.96):

representing an adjusted ("bereinigte") matrix according to Table 2(02).

Appellant 02 further referred to the prior art document:

"Taschenbuch für den Maschinenbau, Dubbel", 1981, pages 452 to 454.

Furthermore, appellant (02) objected to the claimed teaching as representing a mere mathematical method (Article 52(2a) EPC).

V. In an annex to the summons to attend oral proceedings the Board informed the parties that the matrices shown in the Enclosures 2(01), 12(01) or 16(01), 15(01) and Table 2(02) were apparently drafted by the appellants immediately before they opposed the patent in suit or before filing of the appeal to support their argumentation so that inadmissible hindsight considerations could not be excluded.

Oral proceedings before the Board were held on 4 August 1998.

At the oral proceedings the respondent submitted new claims 1 according to a main and an auxiliary request.

Claim 1 (main request) reads as follows:

"Transmission series having a variable gear stage (variation stage) with a pair of gears (5,6) in which the variation stage (3) within the series is defined by

(i) a range of permissible sizes Bi = B1... Bm with respective centre distances Ai = A1... Am and (ii) a range of permissible nominal transmission ratios Ii = I1... In, said range being the same for all sizes Bi,

so that the centre distances Ai and the transmission ratios Ii form a matrix M = Ai, Ii,

wherein the graduation of the centre distances Ai and the graduation of the transmission rations Ii are correlated in such a way that the same gearwheel (5) is incorporated in a variation stage sequence S1, S2,... comprising a plurality of variation stages of the series, whose centre distances Ai and transmission ratios Ii lie on the same diagonal of the matrix M."

Claim 1 (auxiliary request) has the following wording:

"Transmission series having a variable gear stage (variation stage) with a pair of gears (5,6) in which the variation stage (3) within the series is defined by

(i) a range of permissible sizes Bi = B1... Bm with respective centre distances Ai = A1... Am and (ii) a range of permissible nominal transmission ratios Ii = I1... In, said range being the same for all sizes Bi,

so that the centre distances Ai and the transmission ratios Ii form a matrix M = Ai, Ii, wherein the graduation of the centre distances Ai and the graduation of the transmission rations Ii are correlated substantially in accordance with the equation:

Ai............Ii + 1

------.....= -------- = c = const.

Ai-1..........Ii-1+1

whereby the same gearwheel (5) is incorporated in a variation stage sequence S1, S2,... comprising a plurality of variation stages of the series, whose centre distances Ai and transmission ratios Ii lie on the same diagonal of the matrix M."

VI. The appellants requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.

The arguments in support of this request can be summarised as follows:

According to what was said in claim 1 of the patent in suit about the definition of the matrix, it would appear that the term "a range of permissible sizes with respective centre distances" and "a range of permissible nominal transmission ratios" could be interpreted as to allow undefined limits for the admissible value of one centre distance (Ai) in a row (i) of the matrix and also for the admissible value of a nominal tansmission ratio (Ii) in a column (i) of the matrix. Thus, it would appear that claim 1 did not define clearly limited values for the graduated centre distances (A1... Am) and the graduated nominal tansmission ratios (I1... In) but rather allowed unlimited values within a certain range so that the tansmission series as fabricated and sold by the appellants according to the prior uses would appear to lie within the scope of claim 1 of the patent in suit. In particular, the pairs of gearwheels as drawn from the filed catalogues and data sheets could be easily arranged in a mini-matrix with only a few pairs of gearwheels so that the variation stage sequence(s) lying on one diagonal of the matrix and having the same gearwheel in each of its variation stages comprised at least two (i.e. the minimum number of a plurality) variation stage sizes of the series so that the mini-matrix fulfilled the conditions of present claim 1. In such a mini-matrix, even if the deviations from the exact graduations of Ai and Ii in the claimed matrix were restricted to +/-5% (= range of tolerance or permissible variation according to the description and claim 10 of the patent in suit) the columns and the rows of the matrix could be inclined so that a matrix with a distorted structure was formed.

Furthermore, the organizing principle as claimed for the pairs of gearwheels could be formed without any inventive skill by a skilled person inspecting the known transmission series, finding out the regularities and then describing the known transmission series in a new mathematical form, particularly if the skilled person's considerations were based on the real object of the patent in suit, i.e. to make an identical series of transmission ratios available for each permissible transmission size or centre distance.

Another obvious way to find out the mathematical theory, as set out in dependent claim 9 of the patent in suit and representing a mathematical equivalent of the matrix according to claim 1 of the patent in suit, consists in adapting the known formulas for gears (e.g. "Taschenbuch, Dubbel, 1981, pages 452 to 454) according to the teaching set out in the "Handbuch der Antriebstechnik", SEW-EURODRIVE, 1980 (Enclosure 4(01)), that the centre distances should be systematically graduated and the same gear set be used frequently within the transmission series.

For these reasons claim 1, both according to the main and the auxiliary request, was not patentable.

VII. In support of their request that the appeal be dismissed and that the patent be maintained on the basis of the main request or alternatively of the auxiliary request the respondent (patentee) contradicted the arguments of the appellants and put forward the following main arguments:

The product lines of the appellants and particularly the transmission series according to the alleged prior uses were suitable neither to destroy the novelty of the subject-matter of claim 1 of the patent in suit nor to lead the skilled person to the invention in an obvious manner.

The transmission series fabricated by the appellants not only comprised the pairs of gear wheels forming the matrices according to the Enclosures 2(01), 12(01), 15(01), 16(01) and Tables 2/2'(02) but also encompassed a great number of other gearwheels arbritrarily excluded from the matrices. Thus, these matrices were the result of a hindsight based selection of gearwheels out of a "cloud" of pairs of gearwheels as was shown in the patentee's Enclosure G (filed with the letter of 30. July 1998), representing a centre distance-transmission ratio diagram wherein all pairs of gearwheels listed in the appellants' catalogues and data sheets were represented and wherein the grey coloured smaller area contained the pairs of gearwheels selected for the matrices according to Enclosures 15(01). In contrast to that the matrix according to the invention encompassed all pairs of gearwheels of the transmission series as shown in Enclosure H (filed with the respondent's letter of 30. July 1998). Thus, even if all sets of gearwheels selected by the appellants to draft the submitted matrices belonged to the state of art, they did not anticipate the teaching according to claim 1 of the patent in suit.

Furthermore, the prior art documents cited in the description of the patent in suit, i.e. "Turpak - eine neue Zahnradgetriebereihe" in Antriebstechnik, 2/1990, pages 40 to 45, DE-A-2 061 021 and DE-A-3 705 812 showed that in practice the known transmission series disclosed solutions which were far away from the invention. Therefore the claimed subject-matter was clearly inventive.

1. The appeal complies with the requirements of Articles 106 to 108 and Rules 1(1) and 64 EPC. It is therefore admissible.

2. Main request

2.1. Articles 123(2) and (3) EPC

2.1.1. Present claim 1 incorporates all of the features of granted claim 1 except that the word "encompasses" in the first sentence

"Transmission series having a variable gear stage (variation stage) with a pair of gears (5, 6) in which the variation stage (3) within the series encompasses" ...

was replaced by the words

"is defined by".

2.1.2. This amendment makes it clear that all available pairs of gears (variable gear stages, variation stages) of the claimed transmission series must be suitable for being integrated into a matrix according to the teaching of claim 1 of the patent in suit whereas the strict, literal meaning of the wording of claim 1 as granted did not expressively exclude individual variation stages of the series not being suitable to be arranged in a matrix according to the further teaching of claim 1.

2.1.3. The teaching of present amended claim 1 has been clearly disclosed by the embodiment in Figures 2 or 4 or 5 of the patent in suit which exclusively disclose 16 or 49 or 36 variation stages all being integrated into a matrix as claimed.

2.1.4. As results from the two paragraphs above there are no objections under Articles 123(2) and (3) EPC.

2.2. Subject-matter of claim 1 (main request)

According to the common definition in the field of mathematics a matrix is considered as a rectangular array of numbers or other elements which are arranged in horizontally extending rows and vertically extending columns. The rows of the matrix are generally numbered from the top down and the columns from left to right or right to left (the latter is the case in the embodiments of the patent in suit).

In the present case each element (variation stage S1, S2 ...) of the matrix M is represented by a pair of gears 5,6 (variation stage) and the rows and columns are numbered according to the values of centre distances (Ai = A1... Am) of each pair of gears (each centre distance corresponding to the certain size Bi = B1... Bm) and the values of the nominal transmission ratios (Ii = I1... In) of each pair of gears respectively. Thus, the arrangement of the rows/columns represents a graduation of the centre distances and the transmission ratios, whereby the ranges of the graduated permissible centre distances and graduated permissible transmission ratios define the totality of the the elements (pair of gears 5,6) of the transmission series.

Therefore, the terms "range of permissible ..." as used in claim 1 clearly mean a series of fixed graduated values of centre distances Ai and nominal transmission ratios Ii which are correlated (as further defined in claim 1) "in such a way that the same gearwheel (5) is incorporated in a variation stage sequence S1, S2,... comprising a plurality of variation stages of the series, whose centre distances Ai and transmission ratios Ii lie on the same diagonal of the matrix M."

This correlation gives a clear teaching for carrying out the invention as is demonstrated by the description relating to Figure 3 on page 4, lines 12 to 44 of the patent in suit. The description on page 4, line 45 to page 5, line 11 and page 5 lines 20, 21 of the patent in suit further defines the limits within which deviations from the ideal conditions set out in claim 1 are permissible in practice without leaving the claimed teaching.

2.3. Novelty

2.3.1. The prior art documents as set out in the description of the patent in suit and the prior art document Enclosure 4(01) "Handbuch der Antriebstechnik" undisputably do not disclose the claimed series.

2.3.2. It clearly follows from the appellants' argumentation that the matrices according to the Enclosures 2(01), 12(01), 15(01), 16(01) and the Tables 2(02) and 2'(02) have been drafted by the appellants immediately before they opposed the patent or during the following procedures. This finding, already communicated with the Board's "Annex to the summons to attend oral proceedings" (posted 18 November 1997), remained uncontradicted by the Appellants. Furthermore the alleged prior uses were merely advanced to prove that all the gearwheels and variation stages arranged in the matrices have already been made available to the public before the priority date of the patent in suit by the filed catalogues and data sheets. The witnesses had also been offered only to prove the availability of the gearwheels concerned. No evidence was filed or offered which could or should prove that all pairs of gears listed in the gearwheel series according to the catalogues and data sheets were suitable to be installed in a single matrix according to claim 1 of the patent in suit. On the contrary, the catalogues and the technical data sheets show that the matrices filed by the appellants have been built up by a selected portion among the numerous combinations of gearwheels listed in the catalogues and data sheets.

Thus, the series of gearwheels according to the catalogues and the data sheets of the alleged prior uses do not fulfill the conditions as set out in amended claim 1 being clearly restricted by its wording "is defined by" in the sense that all pairs of gears of the series must be suitable to be arranged in a matrix as described in claim 1 (see paragraphs 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 above).

Therefore, the transmission series according to the alleged prior uses do also not disclose the teaching according to claim 1.

2.3.3. The subject-matter of claim 1 is considered to be novel.

2.4. Inventive step

2.4.1. As stated in paragraphs 2.3.2 above the series of gearwheels as listed in the catalogues and data sheets apparently cannot be completely arranged in a matrix as defined in claim 1. The practicability of selecting a limited portion of suitable pairs of gears from the complete and listed series is only given if the theory for the matrix to be built was previously known. Indeed the "Handbuch der Antriebstechnik" (Enclosure 4(01)), pages 225 to 229, describes several ways how to draft transmission series wherein the centre distances are systematically graduated. There however identical pairs of gears are used for several transmissions. These series obviously differ from the series defined in claim 1 of the patent in suit. Also the transmission series as set out in the preamble of the description of the patent in suit (see paragraph VII above) refer to solutions which lead away from the claimed solution. These prior art series clearly show that the teaching of claim 1 is so far away from all known solutions that it was not possible for a skilled person inspecting the lists of gears according to the alleged prior uses to find out certain regularities of the gears and then to formulate the mathematical teaching reflecting these regularities.

This result is also true for the argumentation of appellant (02) that the mathematical equivalent of the claimed series as set out in claim 9 of the patent in suit could be found by the skilled person if the known formulas for gears (e.g. as disclosed in "Taschenbuch, Dubbel, 1981, pages 452 to 454) were adapted to the teaching of Enclosure 4(01), since the transmission series according to the latter prior art document are completely different from the present solution.

2.5. The ground of opposition based upon Article 52(2a) EPC (unpatentable subject-matter) was first introduced into the appeal proceedings by the appellant (02).

According to the decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal G 1/95, OJ EPO 1996, 615 in a case where a patent has been opposed on the grounds of lack of novelty and inventive step the ground of unpatentable subject-matter is considered as a fresh ground for opposition.

This fresh ground for opposition, which in the present case is in substance not considered to challenge the patentability of the patent in suit which obviously does not concern a scientific theory as such, may not be introduced into the proceedings without the agreement of the patentee, which in fact was not expressively given, and is therefore not to be further considered.

2.6. For the above reasons the Board comes to the conclusion that claim 1 according to the main request and consequently also claims 2 to 10 dependent thereof are suitable for maintenance of the patent.

3. Since the main request is accepted the auxiliary request need not be considered.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the first instance with the order to maintain the patent in amended form on the basis of the following documents:

- Claim 1 and description page 4 submitted at the oral proceedings (main request)

- Claims 2 to 10, description pages 2, 3 and 5 and drawings as granted.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • FAQ
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Ordering
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
SoMe facebook 0
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
SoMe instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
SoMe linkedIn
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
SoMe twitter
EPOorg
EPOjobs
SoMe youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility