HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
1996
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Official Journal
  4. 1996
  5. 4 - April
  6. Pages 181-191
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email
4 - April

Overview

Pages 181-191

Download PDF 
Citation: OJ EPO 1996, 181
Online publication date: 30.4.1996
BOARDS OF APPEAL
Decisions of the Legal Board of Appeal

Decision of the Legal Board of Appeal dated 24 July 1995 - J 20/94 - 3.1.1*

(Translation)

Composition of the board:

Chairman:

R. Schulte

Members:

R.E. Teschemacher

 

B. Schachenmann

Applicant: -

Headword:  According of a filing date

Article: 80(d), 90, 92, 93(2), second sentence, EPC

Article: 11(1)(iii)(e) and (3) PCT Patent Law Treaty

Keyword: "Requirements regarding the existence of a claim for according a filing date"

Headnote:

The following points of law are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal:

1. For a filing date to be established in respect of a European patent application is it necessary for the filed application to contain, in addition to a description, at least one claim which is formulated separately from the description and is recognisable as such?

2. If the answer to question 1 is no:

For a filing date to be established within the meaning of Article 80 EPC, is it sufficient if there is at least one claim which, although not expressly formulated as such, is derivable from the invention as described?

3. If the answer to question 2 is yes:

To what extent must a claim which is not expressly formulated as such be derivable:

(a) Is it necessary for at least one claim to be directly and clearly recognisable from the text of the description, or

(b) Is it sufficient for the description to disclose an invention in such a way that it is possible to recognise subject-matter to be protected for which a claim could be formulated?

Summary of facts and submissions

I. European patent application No. ... relating to a safety-gate flag for ski racing was filed on 24 August 1993 claiming Austrian priority of 26 August 1992. The documents filed on that date comprise the Request for grant form (Form 1001), a handwritten description (with the exception of the cover sheet) and five figures. Line "A.2 Claims" of Section 46 of the pre-printed Receipt for documents form (page 5 of the Request for grant form) contains the note "werden nachgereicht" ("will be filed later").

II. In a communication from the Receiving Section dated 30 September 1993 the applicant was informed that the application did not meet the requirements for according a filing date since it contained no patent claims. On 5 October 1993 (received on 11 October 1993) the applicant filed a clean copy of the originally filed description together with nine claims. In a telefax dated 29 October 1993 the applicant was informed that the filing date would have to be changed and the priority could no longer be claimed since the priority date claimed preceded the filing date by more than one year.

III. On 2 November 1993 the applicant replied that the original description already contained a claim in the following passage:

"One further point I should like to stress in particular is that in figures 4 and 5 the opening 36 in figure 4 and the opening 45 in figure 5 are to have a special patent claim..."

After consulting the search examiner the Receiving Section was unable to detect the wording of a claim in the passage cited and drew the applicant's attention to the fact that figure 5 contained no reference number 45 and that the main claim actually filed was in no way directed towards the openings mentioned in the text. In a communication under Rule 39 EPC dated 14 February 1994 the Receiving Section informed the applicant that the filing date had been fixed as 11 October 1993.

IV. In a communication dated 16 February 1994 the Receiving Section informed the applicant in accordance with Rule 41(3) EPC that the priority date claimed preceded the filing date by more than one year and that this deficiency could be corrected within one month; failure to do so would mean that no priority could be claimed. In his reply dated 21 February 1994 the applicant re-stated his view that the original documentation was sufficient for according a filing date and requested that the priority date be accorded as claimed.

V. In a decision dated 5 July 1994 the Receiving Section refused the request that the priority date be accorded as claimed and that the filing date accorded to the application be that on which documents were received. While the original description did contain a reference to a claim, it lacked sufficient technical features. A search would therefore not have been possible on the basis of the original documentation, as had been confirmed by the search examiner.

VI. In a letter dated 28 July 1994 (received on 30 July 1994) the applicant lodged an appeal, filing a statement of grounds and paying the appeal fee.

VII. The applicant argued that, from the passage cited, the following claim could, among others, have been formulated:

"Flag for use in ski racing in which ... ."

The search examiner would have been able to perform a search on the basis of such a claim without difficulty. Moreover, there was nothing to prevent him carrying out a search on the basis of the claims that followed before the search commenced. The relevant formal requirements of the EPC were to be interpreted narrowly since they appeared to be devoid of meaning. In response to a communication from the Board, the appellant added that with the sentence in the description "One further point I should like to stress in particular is that the opening 36 in figure 4 is to have a special patent claim..."

the following claim had been filed:

"Gate flag, as shown in Figure 4, with an opening (36) according to figure 4."

Even assuming such a claim contained deficiencies, these could be corrected during the grant procedure. The sole matter at issue here was whether a claim of any kind had originally been disclosed.

VIII. The appellant requested that the application be accorded a priority date of 26 August 1992 and that the appeal fee be refunded.

Reasons for the decision

1. Under Article 80(d) EPC for an application to be accorded a filing date the documents filed must contain at least one claim. Since, in the case in point, the documents originally filed do not contain any element described as a claim, the requirement of Article 80(d) EPC can only be said to have been complied with if another part of these documents can be viewed as being a claim. This is the assumption of both the department of first instance and the appellant (left undecided in J 20/85, OJ EPO 1987, 102, reasons, 7).

2. The appellant rightly points out that the original documents do not have to comply with the formal requirements of the provisions governing the application (Rule 26 ff EPC) (Article 80(d), second half-sentence, EPC). Accordingly, in practice it is held to be sufficient for a document to be identified which appears to include one or more patent claims (Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, A-II, 4.5). If no document designated as a claim or claims can be identified however, there must be some indication that some other part of the documentation is intended to be a claim. Nor does it appear to be ruled out a priori that a part of the description can be viewed as a claim, although these two parts of the application serve different purposes which are defined in Articles 83 and 84 EPC. While the description is the place for disclosing a reproducible invention, the claims serve to define the subject-matter for which protection is sought. A part cannot therefore be taken arbitrarily from the description and be reinterpreted as a claim. On the contrary, on the date they are filed the application documents must contain information which can be recognised as a subject-matter for which protection is sought.

3. There is some indication of this in the case in point. It becomes clear from the passage cited by the applicant that protection is to be sought for the opening 36 in figure 4, although the passage in question fails to define this opening unequivocally. The wording of the passage ("is to have") refers to the future, indicating that the definition of the subject-matter for which protection is to be sought will follow. This is borne out by the applicant's stating in the pre-printed Receipt for documents form that the claims will follow. At all events, this passage alone does not appear to be suitable for or intended as defining the subject-matter for which protection is sought. For one thing, the form the opening takes is unclear. While the reader has an idea of the form of opening from figure 4 and the description, there are a number of possibilities for defining it.

Finally, the appellant argued that the text in question contained a claim in which the gate flag with its opening was defined by a single reference to the figure. Such a definition is not however immediately derivable from the text cited. Nor is it obvious, because it is clearly not a standard formulation of the claim within the meaning of Rule 29(6) EPC. The text also fails to indicate whether the opening is to be claimed in isolation or in conjunction with other features. The latter could be viewed as being indicated by the second half of the sentence, which the appellant did not cite,

"..., since without these openings a function ..., would quite simply not be possible."

which hints at an interaction between the openings and other features. The appellant submitted several versions of a claim which he contends was contained in the original description. The fact that he derives widely differing wordings for the claims from one and the same passage would appear to indicate that the clear wording of a claim is not immediately apparent from the text in the description.

4. Furthermore, from a reading of the description as a whole, the reader would hardly expect a single claim directed towards the design detail, highlighted by the appellant, of one of five figures. The disclosure focuses on the features of a ... . The subsequently filed claims merely confirm this reading. A claim corresponding to the entire disclosed content cannot therefore be derived from the detail of a description of a figure cited by the appellant. A more likely place to look for one would be in the general part of the description (page 1), according to which (introduction and final paragraph) the following claim would be conceivable:

"Safety-gate flag for use in ski racing, ... ."

5. This again, however, can only be regarded as one of a number of possibilities. Neither the structure nor the text of the description shows conclusively that the said passages are to be understood as representing a claim. From the foregoing, therefore, it must be concluded that the description as filed contained no passage of text that was immediately recognisable as a patent claim.

6. The decision in this case is not therefore dependent solely on the issue left undecided in J 20/85 (see above) as to whether a passage in the description can also be considered as constituting a claim. The Board could only allow the appeal if it were to consider it sufficient for the purposes of satisfying Article 80(d) EPC that a claim could be derived from the description. In the appellant's view the relevant provisions in this case should be interpreted narrowly, not only because they are purely formal requirements, but also because they are devoid of any meaning.

7. The Board cannot agree with this. It sees no support for the argument that formal provisions should in principle be interpreted narrowly. The provisions of the Convention are to be interpreted primarily in the light of their object and purpose (see, for example, G 1/94, OJ EPO 1994, 787, in particular reasons, 7). Hence, in cases of doubt when interpreting a formal provision, the issue is which interpretation is in line with the objectives of the provision. Here it would certainly have to be borne in mind that formal provisions can have the recognisable aim of ensuring legal certainty or that proceedings can be conducted effectively.

8. The requirement that a claim be filed on the filing date clearly serves to speed up the search process. Under Article 92(1) EPC in conjunction with Rule 86(1) EPC, the search report must be drawn up on the basis of the original claims and should be published together with the European patent application (Article 93(2) EPC). European applications filed subsequent to national applications are generally filed at the end of the priority year - as in the present case. This means that as a rule only some six months are available for preliminary and formalities examination, search and publication. As formalities examination is carried out parallel to the search (Article 91 EPC), the time remaining for the search is the period between completion of preliminary examination (Article 90 EPC) and commencement of printing (see Article 92 EPC). The time available can be considerably reduced if a translation of the application documents has to be filed under Article 14(2) and Rule 6(1) EPC, if the fees mentioned in Article 90(3) EPC are only paid during the period of grace under Rule 85a EPC, or if further search fees are payable under Rule 46(1) EPC. Such eventualities can in themselves, and irrespective of the workload in the search divisions, lead to the search report not being completed in time for publication. Given these constraints, there would be no time to complete further rectifying of deficiencies under Article 91 and Rule 40 EPC to allow an applicant to file claims subsequently within the usual time limits (Rule 84 ff EPC) without this causing further delay in the drawing up of the search report.

9. The drafters of the Convention attached particular importance to the public being informed of as yet unexamined applications at an early stage. Since the search report allows conclusions to be drawn about the prospects of an application's success, it is of considerable importance as a source of information both for applicants and for their competitors. At the same time, great stress was also placed on keeping the time limit for requesting examination, which is linked to the publication of the European search report, to a minimum (see van Empel, "The Granting of European Patents", Leyden, 1975, point 370). It is true that the legislator did provide for subsequent, separate publication of the search report (Article 93(2), second sentence, EPC), but, for the reasons outlined above, the intention was for the search report to be published simultaneously with the application, the assumption being that this would where possible be the case (Memorandum to the EPC, note on Article 93, published in "Begründung zum Entwurf des Gesetzes über internationale Patentübereinkommen", Bundestagsdrucksache 7/3712, p. 416). The provisions adopted, which correspond to Article 11(1)(iii)(e) and (3) PCT, are intended to prevent delays in completing the search report wherever possible. The Board, therefore, is not convinced by the appellant's arguments that Articles 80(d) and 90(2) EPC are devoid of meaning.

10. The appellant is not however alone in insisting on a restrictive interpretation of Article 80(d) EPC. Bossung argues that the patent claim required at the outset of proceedings is legally meaningless. A reasonable interpretation of the text could lead to only original documents with a text which appears to contain the disclosure of an invention being required (Münchner Gemeinschaftskommentar, issue 8, 1986, Art. 80 EPC, points 99-101). In his view, the legislative purpose outlined above is not a sufficient reason for refusing to accord a filing date, since the filing of a purely formal claim, while sufficient to satisfy Article 80(d) EPC, is ill-suited for the search if the claim poorly characterises the invention (ibid., note 97).

It is true that where a search is conducted on the basis of the original claims there is no guarantee that the claims will have been formulated in a way that is best suited to the search. Under Article 92(1) EPC, therefore, the search must be conducted with due regard to the description and any drawings. This does not, however, mean that for the purposes of a properly conducted search serving as a basis for an assessment of novelty and inventive step claims can be dispensed with entirely (Rule 44(1) EPC).

11. On the other hand, there is no denying that in practice European patent searches are not completed in good time to the degree envisaged by the legislator. Thus in 1994, for example, some one-third of all applications were published without a search report (European Patent Office, Annual Report 1994, p. 37). This gives cause to question whether the drastic legal consequence arising from failure to comply with Articles 80(d) and 90(2), second sentence, EPC is a suitable and appropriate means for ensuring early completion of the European search report.

12. In this connection the Board would like to draw attention also to Article 8(2) and Rule 7(2) of the draft of a Patent Law Treaty, which would not allow the contracting parties the mechanism provided for in Articles 80(d) and 90(2), second sentence, EPC. Under this draft the only justification for sanctioning failure to file claims with the original documents by refusing to accord a filing date would be if the applicant failed to comply with an invitation to rectify the deficiency and where appropriate pay a surcharge (Records of the Diplomatic Conference for the Conclusion of a Treaty Supplementing the Paris Convention as far as Patents are Concerned, Volume 1: First Part of the Diplomatic Conference, The Hague, 1991, WIPO, Geneva, 1991, Basic Proposal, pp. 18-20, p. 50 ff; see also the proposal by the Swiss delegation in PLT/DC/56, ibid., p. 154 ff; for the discussions of Main Committee I, see ibid., pp. 294-321).

13. The according of a filing date is a fundamental element in the patent grant procedure, since both the establishment of a priority right and the safeguarding of a priority year are dependent on the prescribed requirements being satisfied. Given the doubts raised and the differences in opinion, as well as the threat of final loss of rights for the European applicant concerned, the Board feels that a decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal is required under Article 112(1)(a) EPC as to the conditions under which a filing date can be accorded if expressly formulated claims have not been filed.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The following points of law are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal:

1. For a filing date to be established in respect of a European patent application is it necessary for the filed application to contain, in addition to a description, at least one claim which is formulated separately from the description and is recognisable as such?

2. If the answer to question 1 is no:

For a filing date to be established within the meaning of Article 80 EPC, is it sufficient if there is at least one claim which, although not expressly formulated as such, is derivable from the invention as described?

3. If the answer to question 2 is yes:

To what extent must a claim which is not expressly formulated as such be derivable:

(a) Is it necessary for at least one claim to be directly and clearly recognisable from the text of the description, or

(b) Is it sufficient for the description to disclose an invention in such a way that it is possible to recognise subject-matter to be protected for which a claim could be formulated?

 

* In J 20/94 the application was withdrawn. The Enlarged Board of Appeal will not therefore be issuing a ruling on the merits of the case. Since the application was withdrawn prior to publication, passages in the decision relating to the technical details of the invention will not be published. Copies of the unabridged decision are not available.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility