European Patent Office
1997

10 - October

Overview

Index
1-2 - January - February
3 - March
4 - April
5 - May
6 - June
7 - July
8 - August
9 - September
10 - October
11 - November
12 - December
Supplements / Special editions
Supplement to OJ 5/1997
Special editions
Supplement to OJ 12/1997

    Page 488

    Citation: OJ EPO 1997, 488

    Online publication date: 31.10.1997

    INFORMATION FROM THE CONTRACTING / EXTENSION STATES
    NL Netherlands

    Decision of the Hoge Raad (Supreme Court) dated 27 January 1989 (Meyn v. Stork)*

    Headword: Extraction device

    Article 30(2) Patent Act 77; Article 69(1) EPC and Protocol on Interpretation

    Keyword: "Scope of protection conferred by a patent - limitation to a particular embodiment - waiver of protection"

    Headnotes:

    1. The starting point for determining the scope of protection of a patent is the essence of the patented invention.

    2. A limitation of the invention to a particular embodiment may only be considered to waive part of the protection if there are good reasons to assume such a waiver on the basis of the patent specification and other information accessible to third parties.

    NL 1/97

     

    * Headnotes; the full text of the decision is published in Nederlands Juristenblad 1989, 1852, No. 506, and, in slightly abridged form, in GRUR Int. 1990, 384, and 23 IIC, 529 (1992).

    Service & support

    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary

    Jobs & careers

    Press centre

    Single Access Portal

    Procurement

    Boards of Appeal

    Facebook
    European Patent Office | EPO Jobs
    Instagram
    EuropeanPatentOffice
    Linkedin
    European Patent Office | EPO Jobs | EPO Procurement
    X (formerly Twitter)
    EPOorg | EPOjobs
    Youtube
    TheEPO
    Legal noticeTerms of useData protection and privacyAccessibility