European Patent Office
1999

10 - October

Overview

Index
1 - January
2 - February
3 - March
4 - April
5 - May
6 - June
7 - July
8-9 - August - September
10 - October
11 - November
12 - December
Supplements / Special editions
Supplement to OJ 1/1999
Supplement to OJ 2/1999
Supplement to OJ 5/1999
Special edition No. 1
Special edition No. 2

    Page 589

    Citation: OJ EPO 1999, 589

    Online publication date: 25.10.1999

    BOARDS OF APPEAL
    Information from the Enlarged Board of Appeal

    Referrals by boards of appeal

    By decision T 272/95 dated 15 April 1999, Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.4 has referred the following point of law to the Enlarged Board of Appeal under Article 112(1)(a) EPC:

    (Language of the proceedings)

    I. Is an opposition admissible which otherwise meets the requirements of Article 99 EPC and Rule 55 EPC if it is filed jointly by two or more persons and only one opposition fee is paid ?

    II. If the answer to question 1 is in the affirmative and a common representative was named under Rule 100(1) EPC in the notice of opposition, is an appeal valid even if it is not filed by this person ?

    III. If the answers to questions 1 and 2 are in the affirmative, which other requirements, if any, have to be met by a joint opposition or a joint appeal in order to safeguard the rights of the patent proprietor ?

    The case is pending as G 3/99.

    Service & support

    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary

    Jobs & careers

    Press centre

    Single Access Portal

    Procurement

    Boards of Appeal

    Facebook
    European Patent Office | EPO Jobs
    Instagram
    EuropeanPatentOffice
    Linkedin
    European Patent Office | EPO Jobs | EPO Procurement
    X (formerly Twitter)
    EPOorg | EPOjobs
    Youtube
    TheEPO
    Legal noticeTerms of useData protection and privacyAccessibility