European Patent Office
2003

5 - May

Overview

Index
1 - January
2 - February
3 - March
4 - April
5 - May
6 - June
7 - July
8-9 - August - September
10 - October
11 - November
12 - December
Supplements / Special editions
Supplement to OJ 1/2003
Special edition No. 1
Special edition No. 2
Special edition No. 3
Supplement to OJ 12/2003

    Page 183

    Citation: OJ EPO 2003, 183

    Online publication date: 31.5.2003

    BOARDS OF APPEAL
    Information from the Enlarged Board of Appeal

    Referrals by boards of appeal

    By decision T 451/99 dated 14 March 2003, Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.4 has referred the following point of law to the Enlarged Board of Appeal under Article 112(1)(a) EPC:

    (Language of the proceedings)

    Is the introduction into a claim of a disclaimer not supported by the application as filed admissible, and therefore the claim allowable under Article 123(2) EPC, when the purpose of the disclaimer is to meet a lack-of-novelty objection pursuant to Article 54(3) EPC?

    If yes, what are the criteria to be applied in assessing the admissibility of the disclaimer?

    The case is pending as G 2/03.

     

    Service & support

    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary

    Jobs & careers

    Press centre

    Single Access Portal

    Procurement

    Boards of Appeal

    Facebook
    European Patent Office | EPO Jobs
    Instagram
    EuropeanPatentOffice
    Linkedin
    European Patent Office | EPO Jobs | EPO Procurement
    X (formerly Twitter)
    EPOorg | EPOjobs
    Youtube
    TheEPO
    Legal noticeTerms of useData protection and privacyAccessibility