European Patent Office
2004

11 - November

Overview

  • Index
  • 1 - January
  • 2 - February
  • 3 - March
  • 4 - April
  • 5 - May
  • 6 - June
  • 7 - July
  • 8-9 - August - September
  • 10 - October
  • 11 - November
  • 12 - December
  • Supplements / Special editions

    Page 542

    Citation: OJ EPO 2004, 542a

    Online publication date: 30.11.2004

    BOARDS OF APPEAL

    Information from the Enlarged Board of Appeal

    In case G 4/03 the following points of law have been referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal:

    1) After withdrawal of the sole appeal, may the proceedings be continued for a third who intervened during the appeal proceedings?

    2) If the answer to question 1 is yes:

    Is entitlement to continue the proceedings conditional on the intervener's compliance with formal requirements extending beyond the explicit criteria for an admissible intervention laid down in Article 105 EPC; in particular, does the appeal fee have to be paid?

    Following the withdrawal of the remaining intervention in the referring decision T 1026/98, resulting in the appeal proceedings being terminated, the proceedings before the Enlarged Board of Appeal had also to be terminated.

    Service & support

    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary

    Jobs & careers

    Press centre

    Single Access Portal

    Procurement

    Boards of Appeal

    Facebook
    European Patent Office | EPO Jobs
    Instagram
    EuropeanPatentOffice
    Linkedin
    European Patent Office | EPO Jobs | EPO Procurement
    X (formerly Twitter)
    EPOorg | EPOjobs
    Youtube
    TheEPO
    Legal noticeTerms of useData protection and privacyAccessibility