European Patent Office
2005

1 - January

Overview

Index
1 - January
2 - February
3 - March
4 - April
5 - May
6 - June
7 - July
8-9 - August - September
10 - October
11 - November
12 - December
Supplements / Special editions
Supplement to OJ 1/2005
Supplement 2 to OJ 1/2005
Supplement to OJ 2/2005
Special editions
Supplement to OJ 8-9/2005
Special edition No. 1
Supplement to OJ 12/2005
Supplement 2 to OJ 12/2005

    Page 13

    Citation: OJ EPO 2005, 13

    Online publication date: 31.1.2005

    BOARDS OF APPEAL
    Information from the Enlarged Board of Appeal

    Referrals by boards of appeal

    By decision T 1007/01 dated 27 October 2004, Technical Board of Appeal 3.2.5 has referred the following point of law to the Enlarged Board of Appeal under Article 112(1)(a) EPC:

    (Translation)

    (1) After withdrawal of the sole appeal, may the proceedings be continued for a third who intervened during the appeal proceedings?

    (2) If the answer to question 1 is yes:

    Is entitlement to continue the proceedings conditional on the intervener's compliance with formal requirements extending beyond the explicit criteria for an admissible intervention laid down in Article 105 EPC; in particular, does the appeal fee have to be paid?

    The case is pending as G 3/04.

    Service & support

    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary

    Jobs & careers

    Press centre

    Single Access Portal

    Procurement

    Boards of Appeal

    Facebook
    European Patent Office | EPO Jobs
    Instagram
    EuropeanPatentOffice
    Linkedin
    European Patent Office | EPO Jobs | EPO Procurement
    X (formerly Twitter)
    EPOorg | EPOjobs
    Youtube
    TheEPO
    Legal noticeTerms of useData protection and privacyAccessibility