European Patent Office
Supplementary publication

Supplementary publication 5

Overview

Index
1 - January
2 - February
3 - March
4 - April
5 - May
6 - June
7 - July
8 - August
9 - September
10 - October
11 - November
12 - December
Supplementary publications
Supplementary publication 1
Supplementary publication 2
Supplementary publication 3
Supplementary publication 4
Supplementary publication 5

    Page 326

    Citation: Supplementary publication 5, OJ EPO 2015, 326

    Online publication date: 23.12.2015

    ANNEX
    Case study "Extractor hood"

    Questions:

    1. Does the court have jurisdiction:

    (a) to rule on the issue of infringement of the Swiss part of the European patent? On revocation?

    (b) to rule on infringement of the unitary patent? For which territorial infringements and which types of use? On revocation of the unitary patent?

    2. Does the defendant's product infringe the claimant's patent?

    3. Should the patent be revoked? If so, on what grounds?

    The case study focuses on infringement, so you should consider that issue before turning to revocation. If the group decides that there is no infringement, it should nevertheless examine validity (would that be necessary in practice, given that the action would in any event have to be dismissed?).

     

    Service & support

    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary

    Jobs & careers

    Press centre

    Single Access Portal

    Procurement

    Boards of Appeal

    Facebook
    European Patent Office | EPO Jobs
    Instagram
    EuropeanPatentOffice
    Linkedin
    European Patent Office | EPO Jobs | EPO Procurement
    X (formerly Twitter)
    EPOorg | EPOjobs
    Youtube
    TheEPO
    Legal noticeTerms of useData protection and privacyAccessibility