T 0922/01 vom 09.07.2003

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator: ECLI:EP:BA:2003:T092201.20030709
Datum der Entscheidung: 9. Juli 2003
Aktenzeichen: T 0922/01
Antrag auf Überprüfung von: -
Anmeldenummer: 89904212.1
IPC-Klasse: G01N 27/327 G01N 27/30 G01N 27/28 C12M 1/40
Verfahrenssprache: Englisch
Verteilung: An die Kammervorsitzenden verteilt (C)
Download: Entscheidung auf Englisch
Amtsblattfassungen: Keine AB-Links gefunden
Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte: -
Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung: -
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung: Biosensor and process for its production
Name des Antragstellers: MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
Name des Einsprechenden: Inverness Medical Technology, Inc.
Roche Diagnostics Corporation (opposition withdrawn)
Kammer: 3.4.02
Leitsatz: -
Relevante Rechtsnormen: European Patent Convention Art 100(a) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 100(c) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 102(3) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 111(1) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 111(2) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 113(1) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 114(1) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 114(2) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 123(3) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 150(3) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 158(3) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 52(1) 1973 European Patent Convention Art 54 1973 European Patent Convention Art 56 1973 European Patent Convention R 27(1) 1973 European Patent Convention R 65(1) 1973 European Patent Convention R 71(2) 1973 European Patent Convention R 88 1973Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 11(3)
Schlagwörter: Added subject-matter (no) - on the basis of the international application filed in Japanese
Withdrawal of one of the oppositions
Fresh ground of opposition - no comment of the patent proprietors
Novelty and inventive step (yes)
Remittal for adaption of the description
Orientierungssatz: -
Zitierte Akten: G 0009/91 G 0010/91 G 0011/91 G 0008/93 T 0789/89
Zitierende Akten: -

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the opposition division with the order to maintain the patent in amended form as follows:

- claims 1 to 14 of the only request presented at the oral proceedings;

- description to be adapted, subject to replacement of the expression "embodiment of the prior art" in column 5, line 10 of the patent specification by "embodiment of the invention"; and

- drawings as granted.