T 0042/02 (Transaction system/PITNEY BOWES) vom 28.02.2003
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2003:T004202.20030228
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 28. Februar 2003
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0042/02
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 87905893.1
- IPC-Klasse
- G06K 19/06H04L 9/00
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden und -mitglieder verteilt (B)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Automated transaction system using microprocessor cards
- Name des Antragstellers
- PITNEY BOWES INC.
- Name des Einsprechenden
- Société SECAP
Francotyp-Postalia Aktiengesellschaft & Co.
GIESECKE & DEVRIENT GmbH
NEOPOST LTD - Kammer
- 3.5.01
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 102 1973European Patent Convention Art 113(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 116 1973European Patent Convention Art 19(2) 1973European Patent Convention R 68 1973European Patent Convention R 70(1) 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Intermediate decisions announced by differently composed opposition divisions at first and second oral proceedings - commonly reasoned and jointly signed final decision - substantial procedural violation (yes)
- Orientierungssatz
- If binding intermediate decisions are announced by an Opposition Division at first oral proceedings and further binding intermediate decisions and the final decision are announced by a differently composed Opposition Division at second oral proceedings, then these decisions cannot be commonly reasoned and jointly signed by all members of the two Opposition Divisions without violating fundamental principles deriving from Articles 113(1) and 116 EPC (see point 8 of the "Reasons for the decision").
- Zitierte Akten
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the Opposition Division for further prosecution.
3. Both appeal fees are to be reimbursed.