T 0362/02 (Procedural violation/MONSANTO) vom 26.06.2002
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T036202.20020626
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 26. Juni 2002
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0362/02
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 88870068.9
- IPC-Klasse
- A01N 25/30
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden und -mitglieder verteilt (B)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Improved glyphosate formulations
- Name des Antragstellers
- MONSANTO EUROPE S.A.
- Name des Einsprechenden
- Syngenta Limited
- Kammer
- 3.3.02
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 101 1973European Patent Convention Art 102(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 102(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 102(3)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 110(3) 1973European Patent Convention Art 113 1973European Patent Convention Art 121 1973European Patent Convention Art 122 1973European Patent Convention Art 96 1973European Patent Convention R 51(4) 1973European Patent Convention R 58(1) 1973European Patent Convention R 58(2) 1973European Patent Convention R 58(3) 1973European Patent Convention R 67 1973European Patent Convention R 68(2) 1973Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 10
- Schlagwörter
- Decision without replying to request for extension of time-substantial procedural violation
Revocation of patent in opposition proceedings for mere failure to reply to a communication - no basis in law-substantial procedural violation
Remittal to first instance (yes)
Reimbursement of appeal fee (yes)
Re-establishment of rights - application unnecessary - reimbursement of fee (yes) - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- -
- Zitierende Akten
- T 0459/09
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the department of first instance for further prosecution.
3. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is allowed.
4. The reimbursement of the fee for re-establishment of rights is ordered.