European Patent Office

T 0713/02 (Phosphoramidites/AVECIA) vom 12.04.2005

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
ECLI:EP:BA:2005:T071302.20050412
Datum der Entscheidung
12. April 2005
Aktenzeichen
T 0713/02
Antrag auf Überprüfung von
-
Anmeldenummer
96933245.1
IPC-Klasse
C07F 9/6518
Verfahrenssprache
Englisch
Verteilung
Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
Amtsblattfassungen
Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
-
Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
-
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
In situ preparation of nucleoside phosphoramidites and oligonucleotide synthesis
Name des Antragstellers
Avecia Biotechnology Inc.
Name des Einsprechenden
-
Kammer
3.3.01
Leitsatz

1. Even where the Formalities Officer allowed a request for correction of priority data, that matter is not thereby decided in the applicant's favour in binding form prior to the decision terminating the granting procedure and is, thus, open to review by the Board of Appeal. (Point 2.1 of the reasons)

2. The examination of a request for correction of priority data after the publication of the application is not to be restricted to that portion of the facts and circumstances which in a decision of a Board of Appeal in another case were considered not to preclude the correction. Therefore, in the present case, it cannot be ignored that the requested correction by addition of an earlier priority date would eliminate from the state of the art pursuant to Article 54(2) EPC a highly relevant document, which the applicant had previously de facto accepted as comprised in that state of the art. (Point 2.2 of the reasons)

Schlagwörter
Correction of priority data after publication of application (not allowed) - no separate positive decision in examination proceedings - no binding effect - no res judicata - public taken by surprise - correction not requested promptly
Novelty (no) - prepublished document
Referral of questions to EBA (no) - questions irrelevant for present decision
Refund of appeal fee (no) - unsuccessfull appeal
Orientierungssatz
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The request to refer questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is rejected.

2. The appeal is dismissed.

3. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is refused.