T 1198/20 vom 27.06.2023
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2023:T119820.20230627
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 27. Juni 2023
- Aktenzeichen
- T 1198/20
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 16161403.7
- IPC-Klasse
- F22B 31/00F23C 10/10
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Nicht verteilt (D)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- A FLUIDIZED BED HEAT EXCHANGER AND A CORRESPONDING INCINERATION APPARATUS
- Name des Antragstellers
- Doosan Lentjes GmbH
- Name des Einsprechenden
- Sumitomo SHI FW Energia Oy
- Kammer
- 3.2.03
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 100(a)European Patent Convention Art 101(1)European Patent Convention Art 104(1)European Patent Convention Art 113(1)European Patent Convention Art 116(1)European Patent Convention Art 52(1)European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention R 111(2)European Patent Convention R 116(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(6)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 016(1)
- Schlagwörter
- Right to be heard - opportunity to comment (yes)
Right to be heard - obligation for the opposition division to communicate their preliminary opinion (no)
Right to be heard - appealed decision sufficiently reasoned (yes)
Right to be heard - substantial procedural violation (no)
Novelty - main request (no)
Late-filed request - auxiliary requests 1 to 13
Late-filed request - admissibly raised in first-instance proceedings (no)
Late-filed request - should have been submitted in first-instance proceedings (yes)
Late-filed request - circumstances of appeal case justify admittance (no)
Late-filed request - admitted (no)
Apportionment of costs - different apportionment of costs justified (no) - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- G 0012/91
- Zitierende Akten
- -
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The request for a different apportionment of costs is refused.