T 1758/21 vom 11.10.2023
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2023:T175821.20231011
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 11. Oktober 2023
- Aktenzeichen
- T 1758/21
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 16002238.0
- IPC-Klasse
- B25J 13/08B25J 9/16B25J 17/00
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Nicht verteilt (D)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- DRIVING MECHANISM, ROBOT APPARATUS MEASUREMENT METHOD, ROBOT APPARATUS CONTROL METHOD AND COMPONENT MANUFACTURING METHOD
- Name des Antragstellers
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
- Name des Einsprechenden
- Brandes, Antje
- Kammer
- 3.2.07
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 100(a)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 54Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(1)(a)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(5)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(2)
- Schlagwörter
- Novelty - main request (no)
Novelty - auxiliary requests 2 and 16 (no)
Amendments - added subject-matter (yes)
Amendments - auxiliary requests 1,8,9,15
Discretion not to admit submission - requirements of Art. 12(3) RPBA 2020 met (no)
Discretion not to admit submission - auxiliary requests 6,7, 10-14
Amendment to case - amendment overcomes objection (no)
Amendment to case - auxiliary requests 3-5
Amendment to case - reasons for submitting amendment in appeal proceedings (yes)
Amendment to case - auxiliary requests 15 and 16
Amendment after summons - exceptional circumstances (no)
Amendment after summons - auxiliary requests 1a,2a,2b,15a,16a,16b - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- T 1041/21
- Zitierende Akten
- T 0205/22
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The patent is revoked.