T 2011/21 vom 03.09.2024
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2024:T201121.20240903
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 3. September 2024
- Aktenzeichen
- T 2011/21
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 13003568.6
- IPC-Klasse
- B60N 2/28
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Nicht verteilt (D)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- Zusammenfassung von Article 117 EPC
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Child safety seat
- Name des Antragstellers
- BRITAX RÖMER Kindersicherheit GmbH
- Name des Einsprechenden
- CYBEX GmbH
- Kammer
- 3.2.01
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 111European Patent Convention Art 112European Patent Convention Art 113European Patent Convention Art 117European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 52(1)European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention Art 83European Patent Convention Art 84European Patent Convention R 103(1)(a)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
- Schlagwörter
- Evidence - public prior use
Evidence - review of the evaluation of evidence by the first instance
Novelty - main request (no)
Novelty - auxiliary request (yes)
Inventive step - auxiliary request (yes)
Sufficiency of disclosure - (yes)
Amendments - allowable (yes)
Claims - clarity in opposition appeal proceedings
Amendment to case - amendment within meaning of Art. 12(4) RPBA 2020 (yes)
Amendment to case - admitted (yes)
Reply to statement of grounds of appeal - new request substatiated (yes)
Substantial procedural violation - (no)
Appeal decision - remittal to the department of first instance (no)
Reimbursement of appeal fee - (no)
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (no) - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierende Akten
- T 0925/23
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the opposition division with the order to maintain the patent with the claims of the auxiliary request 3 filed with the reply to the statement of grounds of appeal, and a description to be adapted thereto.
3. The requests for reimbursement of the appeal fee and for referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal are refused.