T 0672/89 vom 07.11.1990

ORDER

For these reasons, it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the Examining Division for further prosecution on the basis of the documents listed in section VII of the present decision with the following amendments:

page 7a, lines 13 to 16, replacement of the existing text by "an electrode body having a flat processing surface, a length defined between first and second ends, a width defined between two parallel sides extending normally to the processing surface, and a thickness which is substantially less than said length and width of the electrode body;" Claim 3, replacement of the second paragraph, commencing on line 3 of page 22, by the text mentioned above in relation with page 7a, lines 13 to 16, with the further insertion of reference (31) after "an electrode body" and reference (26) after "a flat processing surface"; Claim 8, replacement of the precharacterising clause by "a magnetron electron apparatus as claimed in Claim 1 or any of Claims 4-7 as appendant to Claim 1"; Claim 13, third line, replacement of reference (39) by (39,41).