T 0830/91 (Late amendments) vom 25.05.1993
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T083091.19930525
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 25. Mai 1993
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0830/91
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 87116757.3
- IPC-Klasse
- A61K 47/00
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
- Download
- -
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- T 0830/91 Amendments/WHITBY 1994-09-15
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Penetration enhancers for transdermal delivery of systemic agents
- Name des Antragstellers
- Whitby Research
- Name des Einsprechenden
- -
- Kammer
- 3.3.02
- Leitsatz
The following questions are referred to the Enlarged Board:
1. In the light of Article 113(2) EPC, is Rule 51(6) EPC to be interpreted such that an approval submitted under Rule 51(4) EPC becomes binding once a communication in accordance with Rule 51(6) EPC has been issued?
2. Is the European Patent Office obliged to consider reservations under Article 167(2) EPC as constituting requirements of the EPC which have to be met according to Article 96(2) EPC?
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 113(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 164(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 167(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 96(2) 1973European Patent Convention R 51 1973European Patent Convention R 86(3) 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Admissibility of amendments after a Rule 51(6) communication
Reservations under Article 167(2) EPC
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- -
- Zitierende Akten
- J 0030/95
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The following questions are referred to the Enlarged Board:
1. In the light of Article 113(2) EPC, is Rule 51(6) EPC to be interpreted such that an approval submitted under Rule 51(4) EPC becomes binding once a communication in accordance with Rule 51(6) EPC has been issued?
2. Is the European Patent Office obliged to consider reservations under Article 167(2) EPC as constituting requirements of the EPC which have to be met according to Article 96(2) EPC?