J 0901/86 (Professional representative/Legal incapacity) of 04.11.1986
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1986:J090186.19861104
- Date of decision
- 4 November 1986
- Case number
- J 0901/86
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- -
- IPC class
- -
- Language of proceedings
- French
- Distribution
- No distribution (D)
- Download
- -
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- non publié
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.1.01
- Headnote
1. Legal incapacity of the professional representative under Rule 102(2)(a) EPC, as with Rule 90(1)(c), is incapacity to carry out professional work before the EPO, and must be of a persistent nature.
2. A reasonable basis for decisions on the matter by the EPO is the test: is the representative concerned in a fit mental state to do the work required of him or does he suffer from a persistent incapacity to make rational decisions and to take necessary actions?
3. The Legal Division is competent to decide on such incapacity and delete the representative concerned. However, it must base its decision on convincing evidence of persistent incapacity, obtaining additional evidence if that supplied is not conclusive.
4. A professional representative thought likely to be incapable of representing clients before the EPO must be thought equally likely to be incapable of defending his own interests and thus to present his comments on the grounds for any deletion proceedings. A decision deleting him for incapacity from the list of professional representatives which is taken without his having been assisted in the proceedings by an ad hoc guardian is thus in breach of Article 113(1) EPC.
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 113(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 20(1) 1973European Patent Convention R 102(2)(a) 1973European Patent Convention R 67 1973
- Keywords
- Deletion for legal incapacity
Competence of the Legal Division
Additional evidence/need to obtain
Guardian - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
- Citing cases
- J 0007/20
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The decision of the Legal Division ... is set aside.
2. The matter is referred back to the Legal Divison.
3. The appeal fee is refunded.