European Patent Office

J 0007/20 of 03.09.2021

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2021:J000720.20210903
Date of decision
3 September 2021
Case number
J 0007/20
Petition for review of
-
Application number
09701716.4
IPC class
E03F 5/04
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
No distribution (D)
OJ versions
No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
DRAIN WITH ADJUSTING FRAME
Applicant name
Easy Sanitairy Solutions B.V.
Opponent name
Group Nivelles NV
Kessel AG
Board
3.1.01
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950) Art 6(1)European Patent Convention Art 106(1)European Patent Convention Art 112aEuropean Patent Convention Art 113(1)European Patent Convention Art 121European Patent Convention Art 122European Patent Convention Art 125European Patent Convention Art 134(5)European Patent Convention Art 134a(1)European Patent Convention Art 21(1)European Patent Convention R 115(2)European Patent Convention R 134(5)European Patent Convention R 142European Patent Convention R 154(2)(a)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2007 Art 015(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 015(3)Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 14(4)Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) Art 31(1)Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) Art 32
Keywords
Legal incapacity of the representative (no)
Interruption of review proceedings under Article 112a EPC (no)
Opponents status as parties to appeal proceedings (yes)
Fresh case on appeal (no)
Legal Board of Appeal competent to review decisions by Enlarged Board of Appeal (no)
Referral to Enlarged Board of Appeal required (no)
Catchword
The list of events, i.e. grounds, prompting interruption of proceedings under Rule 142(1)(c) EPC is exhaustive.
External, practical and one-off kind of events (inter alia heavy snow, cancelled flights and failed communication) do not constitute "legal incapacity of the representative" under Rule 142(1)(c) EPC.
Citing cases
J 0002/22

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The request for referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the three questions filed on 25 May 2021 is rejected.

2. The appeal is dismissed.