Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 1394/06 27-05-2010
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 1394/06 27-05-2010

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T139406.20100527
Date of decision
27 May 2010
Case number
T 1394/06
Petition for review of
-
Application number
97949210.5
IPC class
C08L 59/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 45.2 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Polyacetal resin composition and moldings

Applicant name
Polyplastics Co., Ltd.
Opponent name
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Board
3.3.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 84
Keywords
Main request, auxiliary requests 1-2 - definition of parameter - clarity (no)
Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 1129/97
T 0555/05
Citing decisions
-

I. The mention of the grant of European patent No. EP-B-0955337, based on application 97949210.5, filed on 22 December 1997 in the name of Polyplastics Co., Ltd. was published on 25 February 2004 in Bulletin 2004/09.

II. The granted patent was based on 18 claims, wherein independent claims 1, 14 and 16 read as follows:

"1. A polyacetal resin composition comprising a polyacetal resin, a glyoxyldiureide compound and a basic nitrogen-containing compound wherein the ratio of the glyoxyldiureide compound relative to the basic nitrogen-containing compound is 20/80-80/20 (w/w).

14. A process for producing a polyacetal resin composition which comprises mixing a polyacetal resin, a glyoxyldiureide compound and a basic nitrogen-containing compound wherein the ratio of the glyoxyldiureide compound relative to the basic nitrogen-containing compound is 20/80-80/20 (w/w).

16. A shaped article as molded from a polyacetal resin composition comprising a polyacetal resin, a glyoxyldiureide compound, and a basic nitrogen-containing compound, wherein the ratio of the glyoxyldiureide compound relative to the basic nitrogen-containing compound is 20/80-80/20 (w/w) and the emission of formaldehyde from which on 24-hour standing in a closed space at a temperature of 80ºC is not greater than 1.5 µg per cm**(2) surface area of the article."

Claims 2-13, 15 and 17-18 were dependent claims directed to elaborations of the composition of claim 1, of the process of claim 14 and of the article of claim 16, respectively.

III. A notice of opposition against the patent was filed by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company on 25 November 2004 on the ground of Art. 100 (a) EPC (lack of novelty, lack of inventive step) and Art. 100 (b) EPC.

IV. By a decision of the opposition division issued in writing on 11 July 2006 the patent was revoked because neither the main request (claims 1 to 18), nor auxiliary request 1 (claims 1 to 10), nor auxiliary request 2 (claims 1 to 9), all filed with letter of 29 June 2005, fulfilled the requirements of Art. 123 (2) EPC. Independent claim 1 of the main request was worded as follows:

"1. A polyacetal resin composition comprising a polyacetal resin, a glyoxyldiureide compound and a basic nitrogen-containing compound

wherein the basic nitrogen-containing compound is at least one member selected from the group consisting of hydrazine or a derivative thereof, guanidine or a derivative thereof, a polyaminotriazine, and a nitrogen-containing resin, and the ratio of the glyoxyldiureide compound relative to the basic nitrogen-containing compound is 20/80-80/20 (w/w)."

Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request was directed to a shaped article moulded from a composition comprising, inter alia, a basic nitrogen-containing compound defined as in claim 1 of the main request.

Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request was based on claim 1 of the first auxiliary request, which was further limited, inter alia, by requiring that the basic nitrogen-containing compound be selected from the group consisting of melamine or a derivative thereof, a guanamine or a derivative thereof, melamine resin and guanamine resin.

The opposition division considered that the amendment specifying the basic nitrogen-containing compound in claim 1 of each of the main request and of auxiliary requests 1-2 extended beyond the content of the application as filed, in particular because these requests all failed to specify, for each class of compounds claimed, whether they corresponded to compounds of either "low molecular weight" or "high molecular weight" as recited in the application as filed (see e.g. paragraph [0028] of the A1 publication). Hence, none of the requests of the patent proprietor was found to be allowable.

V. A notice of appeal against the decision of the opposition division was filed on 8 September 2006 by the patent proprietor with simultaneous payment of the prescribed fee. In its statement of grounds of appeal received on 13 November 2006, the appellant requested that the contested decision be set aside and that the patent be maintained in its amended form according to the main request (claims 1-18) or auxiliary request 1 (claims 1-18) or auxiliary request 2 (claims 1-18) filed therewith.

The three independent claims of the main request read as follows:

"1. A polyacetal resin composition comprising a polyacetal resin, a glyoxyldiureide compound and a basic nitrogen-containing compound wherein the ratio of the glyoxyldiureide compound relative to the basic nitrogen-containing compound is 20/80-80/20 (w/w).

14. A process for producing a polyacetal resin composition which comprises mixing a polyacetal resin, a glyoxyldiureide compound and a basic nitrogen-containing compound wherein the ratio of the glyoxyldiureide compound relative to the basic nitrogen-containing compound is 20/80-80/20 (w/w).

16. A shaped article as molded from a polyacetal resin composition comprising a polyacetal resin, a glyoxyldiureide compound, and a basic nitrogen-containing compound,

the ratio of the glyoxyldiureide compound relative to the basic nitrogen-containing compound is 20/80-80/20 (w/w) and

the emission of formaldehyde from the article on 24-hour standing in a closed space under dry conditions at a temperature of 80ºC is not greater than 1.5 µg per cm**(2) surface area of the article."

Claims 2-13, 15 and 17-18 were dependent claims directed to elaborations of the composition of claim 1, of the process of claim 14 and of the article of claim 16, respectively.

Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request read as follows:

"1. A polyacetal resin composition comprising a polyacetal resin, a glyoxyldiureide compound and a basic nitrogen-containing compound

wherein the basic nitrogen-containing compound is at least one member selected from the group consisting of a low molecular weight compound and a high molecular weight compound, wherein the low molecular weight compound is hydrazine or a derivative thereof, guanidine or a derivative thereof, a polyaminotriazine, uracil or a derivative thereof, or cytosine or a derivative thereof, and the high molecular weight compound is a nitrogen-containing resin, and

the ratio of the glyoxyldiureide compound relative to the basic nitrogen-containing compound is 20/80-80/20 (w/w)."

Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request corresponded to claim 1 of the first auxiliary request further limited by the requirement that the basic nitrogen-containing compound is to be selected from "the group consisting of a low molecular weight compound and a high molecular weight compound, wherein the low molecular weight compound is hydrazine or a derivative thereof, guanidine or a derivative thereof, or a polyaminotriazine, and the high molecular weight compound is a nitrogen-containing resin".

Claim 16 of each of auxiliary requests 1-2 corresponded to a limitation of independent claim 16 of the main request and both referred, inter alia, to the same requirement regarding the emission of formaldehyde measured "under dry conditions" as recited in claim 16 of the main request.

The remaining claims of auxiliary requests 1-2 are not important for the present decision.

Oral proceedings were requested as an auxiliary measure.

VI. In its reply to the notice of appeal dated 23 March 2007, the opponent, now respondent, requested that the appeal be dismissed, the contested decision be confirmed and the patent be revoked in its entirety. The respondent considered that the main request and auxiliary requests 1-2 did not meet the requirements of Art. 84 EPC, Art. 83 EPC, Art. 54 EPC and Art. 56 EPC and that auxiliary requests 1-2 did not satisfy the requirements of Art. 123 (2) EPC.

The respondent, in particular, argued that the expression "under dry conditions" present in claim 16 of the main request and in claim 16 of each of auxiliary requests 1-2 corresponded to an amendment of granted claim 16, which contravened Art. 84 EPC. The respondent first submitted that this term had no accepted technical meaning and that reference to the description e.g. to paragraphs [0059]-[0060] of the patent in dispute was not suitable to render said expression clear. In addition, it was contested that the information provided in said paragraphs [0059]-[0060] were suitable to render said expression sufficiently clear.

The respondent further objected that the terms "low molecular weight" and "high molecular weight", which were present in claim 1 of both auxiliary requests 1-2 did not have a well-recognised meaning in the art and, thus, rendered the subject matter for which protection was sought unclear. This objection was in particular relevant regarding the claimed high and low molecular weight "derivative(s)" of chemical compounds.

Oral proceedings were requested as an auxiliary measure.

VII. On 28 January 2010 the board issued a summons to attend oral proceedings and informed the parties of its provisional opinion.

Regarding clarity, the board considered that the term "dry conditions" had no clear and unambiguous definition in the art and that it was derivable from the original disclosure that the measurements of the claimed parameter "emission of formaldehyde" were dependent on the measurement conditions. Hence, the parties were informed that the amendment made e.g. to claim 16 of the main request had led to a lack of clarity in the sense of Art. 84 EPC.

In addition, according to the board, the terms "low molecular weight" and "high molecular weight", did not have a precise meaning and, thus, rendered unclear the subject matter for which protection was sought e.g. in claim 1 of each of auxiliary requests 1-2.

The board further considered that the requirements of Art. 123 (2) EPC and Art. 83 EPC appeared to be satisfied by the main request as well as by auxiliary requests 1-2.

Finally, the board indicated that novelty over D1 (WO 96/04591 A) would be examined and that the assessment of the inventive merit would be done following the problem-solution approach, probably starting from either D1 or D3 (Gächter/Müller, Plastics Additives, 3rd Ed., 1990, pages 88-93) as closest prior art.

VIII. The appellant withdrew its request for oral proceedings by letter of 6 May 2010.

IX. Oral proceedings were held on 27 May 2010 in the absence of the appellant.

The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed and the patent be revoked in its entirety because neither the main request, nor auxiliary request 1, nor auxiliary request 2 fulfilled the requirements of Art. 84 EPC, Art. 83 EPC, Art. 54 EPC or Art. 56 EPC and because auxiliary requests 1-2 did not satisfy the requirements of Art. 123 (2) EPC.

X. During the oral proceedings the respondent repeated its objections already made in writing concerning the lack of clarity of the term "under dry conditions" present in claim 16 of the main request and of both auxiliary requests 1 and 2. The first objection was that, due to the presence of such a vague and relative term, claim 16 would not be clear per se, contrary to the requirements of Art. 84 EPC. The second objection was that the content of the description of the patent and the examples demonstrated that the degree of humidity had an impact on the measurements of the emission of formaldehyde. Indeed, formaldehyde emissions measured for a given composition/article under humid environment more than twice as high as those measured under dry environment were e.g. reported in Table 3 of the patent in suit. In the absence of information related to the humidity level used for the determination of formaldehyde emission, claim 16 was further unclear.

The Chairman of the board explained that the mere variability or mathematical imprecision in a parameter was not necessarily enough to be objectionable under Art. 84 EPC. In the present case, the Chairman agreed that the data of the patent showed that the formaldehyde emission measurements depended on the degree of humidity, but remarked that the values of formaldehyde emission under both dry and humid conditions reported in Table 3 for the examples illustrative of the subject matter claimed were all below the claimed value of 1.5 µg per cm**(2). Hence, it was questionable whether the variability of the parameter claimed was such so as to lead to a lack of clarity according to Art. 84 EPC.

The respondent pointed out that it remained that the claims were not clear per se and that, in its opinion, the large variability shown in Table 3 was, indeed, objectionable under Art. 84 EPC. The respondent further stressed that all these objections had already been raised in its reply to the statement of grounds of appeal and that the patent proprietor had neither replied to the objections nor modified said claims e.g. on the basis of the description in order to remove these objections raised.

XI. Finally, the respondent also repeated its objections regarding the lack of clarity of the expressions "low molecular weight" and "high molecular weight", in particular in connection with the terms "derivative", present in claim 1 of both auxiliary requests 1-2.

Final requests

XII. The appellant requested that the patent be maintained in its amended form according to the main request or auxiliary request 1 or auxiliary request 2, all filed on 13 November 2006.

The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed.

XIII. The board announced its decision at the end of the oral proceedings.

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. Clarity: Art. 84 EPC

2.1 Main request

2.1.1 Claim 16 corresponds to granted claim 16, which has furthermore been inter alia amended so as to require that the emission of formaldehyde from the article on 24-hour standing in a closed space "under dry conditions" at a temperature of 80ºC is not greater than 1.5 µg per cm**(2) surface area of the article.

According to the EPO case law the unambiguous characterisation in a claim of a product by a parameter (here the emission of formaldehyde) necessarily requires that the parameter can be clearly and reliably determined (see e.g. T 555/05 of 24 May 2007, not published in OJ EPO: section 3.2.8 of the reasons). This requirement is in particular necessary in order for the public to know whether they are working within the claims or not.

2.1.2 The board agrees with the respondent that the term "under dry conditions" has no well-recognised technical meaning. This term is, thus, vague and renders the subject matter claimed unclear.

There is also no evidence on file that the skilled person reading the patent in suit would have associated said measurement conditions with only one standard method well accepted in the art. Therefore, the skilled person could not have completed the lack of an accepted definition for that term on the basis of its general knowledge.

The board further agrees with the respondent that the claims should be clear in themselves and that reference to the description, here paragraphs [0059]-[0062], is not suitable to render clear the subject matter claimed. This requirement derives in particular from the wording of Art. 84 EPC itself, which requires that the claims should be clear and concise. This conclusion is, furthermore, in agreement with accepted EPO case law, see e.g. T 1129/97 (OJ EPO 2001, 273), wherein it was decided that, in order to meet the requirements of Art. 84 EPC, it was not sufficient for the skilled person to be able to resolve a lack of clarity in a claim by referring to the description.

The subject matter of claim 16, thus, does not fulfil the requirements of Art. 84 EPC.

2.1.3 Furthermore, in the present case, it is derivable from the patent itself that the conditions of measurement, in particular humidity, have an impact on the determination of said parameter "emission of formaldehyde". It is in particular clearly distinguished between measurements performed either "under dry conditions" (paragraphs [0059]-[0060] of the patent) and "under humid conditions" (paragraphs [0061]-[0062] of the patent). Paragraph [0060], for instance, reads as follows:

"[0060] After the shaped article of polyacetal resin is cut and its surface area measured where necessary, a suitable portion of the article (e.g. the amount equivalent to a surface area of about 10 to 50 cm**(2)) is placed in a hermetically closed vessel (20 ml capacity) and allowed to stand at a temperature of 80ºC for 24 hours. Then, this closed vessel is charged with 5 ml of water and the formalin in the aqueous solution is assayed in accordance with JIS K0102, 29 (under the heading of Formaldehyde) to calculate the formaldehyde emission (µg/cm**(2)) per unit surface area of the shaped article."

Similar information is provided in paragraph [0062] of the patent regarding the measurements "under humid conditions", corresponding to conditions of saturated i.e. maximum humidity as indicated in claim 17 of the patent in suit.

Hence, in addition to the temperature and the period of time during which the article is left under controlled environment - features which are, indeed, recited in claim 16 - the experimental part of the description of the contested patent provides precise information regarding the size of the container in which the article is inserted, as well as the amount of water added in said container at the beginning of the experiment. In the view of the board, this information is provided in order to define, implicitly, the actual degree of humidity present in the container in which the article is stored for a given period of time (e.g. 24 hours for the "dry conditions") before determining the amount of formaldehyde which has eluted from the article during this period of time. This degree of humidity corresponds, in the case of the so-called "dry conditions" to a specific value of relative humidity (ratio in % of the partial pressure of water vapour to the saturated vapour pressure of water vapour at a prescribed temperature). As derivable from claim 17 of the granted patent, the determination under "humid conditions" corresponds, apparently, to maximum humidity i.e. measurement under saturated vapour pressure of water vapour at the prescribed temperature.

That the measurements of the emission of formaldehyde are dependent on humidity is derivable from the fact that the patent specifies two different conditions of measurements in relation to two different humidity levels. Furthermore, paragraph [0058] of the patent also states that it is preferable that the article shows said formaldehyde emission levels under either of said "dry conditions" or "humid conditions", thereby implying that the emissions of formaldehyde are not identical under these different humidity conditions. Finally, examples 15-25 (Table 3 of the granted patent), which all illustrate the subject matter claimed, confirm that, for a given article, the formaldehyde emission measured under dry conditions differs from that measured under humid environment.

Hence, in the absence of any information in claim 16 concerning the volume of the container to be used and/or of the amount of water or water vapour present in said container at the beginning of the measurement, the degree of humidity present during the measurement is not clearly and unambiguously defined. The board, thus, agrees with the argument of the respondent that the parameter related to the formaldehyde emission "under dry conditions" which is recited in claim 16 is unclear.

The board notes that this objection was raised by the respondent as early as possible in the appeal proceedings, namely in its reply to the statement of grounds of appeal. The appellant has, however, never replied to this objection and thus, never contested the submissions made by the respondent in this respect. Considering that this objection is plausible, in particular when considering the evidence on file e.g. Table 3 of the patent in suit, and in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the board decided that this objection of the respondent could be agreed to.

2.1.4 The board, thus, concludes that the subject matter of claim 16 is characterised by a parameter, namely the emission of formaldehyde, which has been defined incompletely in the claims and for which the lack of definition cannot be completed by the skilled person's general knowledge. The amendment of granted claim 16, thus, does not fulfil the requirements of Art. 84 EPC and is not allowable.

2.1.5 Claim 16 of the main request being not allowable, the main request as a whole must be refused.

2.2 Auxiliary requests 1-2

2.2.1 The same objection as for claim 16 of the main request, regarding the lack of clarity of the expression "under dry conditions" in relation to the emission of formaldehyde, applies to claim 16 of each of auxiliary requests 1-2.

2.2.2 Besides, claim 1 of both auxiliary requests 1-2 requires that the basic nitrogen-containing compound should either be a "low molecular weight compound" selected from specific classes of chemical compounds and derivatives thereof or, alternatively, a "high molecular weight compound" selected from another specific class of compounds.

The board agrees with the respondent that, since the terms "low molecular weight" and "high molecular weight" are of relative nature, they have no clear and unambiguous meaning. In particular, the use of the term "low molecular weight" to characterise the "derivative(s)" of the chemical compounds claimed renders the subject matter claimed further unclear: in the absence of any definition for these derivatives in the claims, this term is to be understood in its broadest sense and encompasses any compound derivable by any kind of process from the compounds recited in claim 1 (hydrazine, guanidine, uracil and cytosine). The same holds true regarding the claimed polyaminotriazine, which may comprise radicals of any size and molecular weight. Since no definition is provided as to where the limit for the low and high molecular weight compounds is to be set, the skilled person is not in a position to distinguish compounds which belong to the subject matter claimed from those which do not.

The subject matter claimed for which protection is sought is, thus, unclear and does not meet the requirements of Art. 84 EPC.

As discussed above in section 2.1.2, the claims should be clear per se, which is not the case. However, for the sake of completeness, the board notes that, contrary to the parameter "emission of formaldehyde", the description of the patent in dispute does not provide a clear definition for these terms.

2.2.3 Each of claims 1 and 16 of both auxiliary requests 1 and 2 being not allowable, these requests, in their entirety, must be refused.

2.3 All these objections of lack of clarity had been raised in writing by the respondent in its reply to the notice of appeal with regard to the valid set of requests. The appellant has, however, never replied to these objections. The withdrawal by the appellant of its request for oral proceedings is seen as a decision to surrender, voluntarily, its right to be heard pursuant to Art. 113 EPC, in particular with regard to the issue of clarity. The board has, thus, considered that the appellant was relying on its written case (Art. 15 (3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal).

2.4 Under these circumstances, and since none of the requests of the appellant (patent proprietor) fulfils the requirements of Art. 84 EPC, the patent in suit is to be revoked. A discussion of the other issues addressed in the communication dated 28 January 2010, namely Art. 123 (2) EPC, Art. 83 EPC, Art. 54 EPC and Art. 56 EPC is thus superfluous.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility