European Patent Office

T 1019/92 of 09.06.1994

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1994:T101992.19940609
Date of decision
9 June 1994
Case number
T 1019/92
Petition for review of
-
Application number
86308866.2
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Distributed to board chairmen and members (B)
OJ versions
No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
Failsafe engine controller
Applicant name
General Motors Corporation
Opponent name
Robert Bosch GmbH
Board
3.2.01
Headnote
-
Keywords
Late submitted material - late filed facts - late submission of public prior use (admitted) - no abuse of procedure - absence of evidence
Notice of opposition - admissibility - objective basis - requirements - relevant date - substantiation of the grounds of opposition - sufficiency (yes)
Enlarged Board - referral (no)
Inventive step (no)
Extent to which a patent is opposed
No prior art material cited - dependent claims
Catchword
I. If an opponent requests revocation of the patent in its entirety then the fact that no specific prior art material is cited against a dependent claim does not exclude that claim from the opposition (point 2.1 of the Reasons, paragraphs 3 and 4).
II. The fact that an opponent after the end of the opposition period subsequently submits prior art material originating from himself does not constitute an abuse of the proceedings in the absence of evidence that this was done deliberately for tactical reasons (see point 2.2 of the Reasons).

ORDER

For these reasons, it is decided that:

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The requests for refund of the appeal fee and for referral of a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal are rejected.