Special Edition no. 1 to OJ EPO 2011: 15th European Patent Judges' Symposium Lisbon / 14-18 September 2010
Online publication date: 02.03.2011
15th European Patent Judges' Symposium Lisbon / 14-18 September 2010
Article | Page(s) | View |
|---|---|---|
OPENING OF THE SYMPOSIUM AND WELCOMING ADDRESS | ||
| Luís NORONHA NASCIMENTO | 1 | |
| Alberto MARTINS | 2-5 | |
| Benoît BATTISTELLI | 6-10 | |
| António CAMPINOS | 11-18 | |
| Peter MESSERLI | 19-24 | |
REPORT ON PROCEEDINGS | ||
| Ulrich JOOS Fabienne GAUYE | 25-58 | |
WORKING SESSION | ||
The judicial system in Europe | ||
| Margot FRÖHLINGER | 59-65 | |
Exclusions from patentability with special focus on the medical field | ||
| Sylvie MANDEL Exceptions to patentability in the medical field | 66-73 | |
| Brigitte GÜNZEL Exclusions from patentability of relevance in the medical field – recent cases before the Enlarged Board of Appeal | 74-84 | |
| Peter MEIER-BECK Non-patentability, in particular in the medical field | 85-92 | |
Patentability of computer implemented inventions | ||
| Dai REES Patentability of computerimplemented inventions at the EPO | 93-102 | |
| Randall R. RADER Patent Eligible subject-matter in the United States – After Bilski | 103-107 | |
The role of intent in patent claims | ||
| Dieter BRÄNDLE The significance of subjective elements in patent law | 108-115 | |
| Rainer MOUFANG Use and purpose indications in patent claims | 116-128 | |
| Christopher FLOYD The role of intent in patent claims – old paint in new tins | 129-148 | |
NATIONAL JUDGES' PRESENTATIONS | ||
AT Austria | ||
| Irmgard GRISS | 149-151 | |
CH Switzerland | ||
| Tobias BREMI | 152-155 | |
DE Germany | ||
| Peter MEIER-BECK | 156-169 | |
FR France | ||
| Sophie DARBOIS | 170-172 | |
GB United Kingdom | ||
| David KITCHIN | 173-182 | |
IT Italy | ||
| Gabriella MUSCOLO | 183-189 | |
| Massimo SCUFFI | 190-192 | |
NL Netherlands | ||
| Rian KALDEN Philips v. SK Kassetten/FRAND | 193-195 | |
| Rian KALDEN Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz/Allowability of disclaimer | 196-199 | |
| Rian KALDEN Solvay v. Honeywell/referral to ECJ on 6 (1) and 16 (4) EEX Regulation | 200-202 | |
NO Norway | ||
| Are STENVIK | 203-204 | |
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS | ||
| List of participants | 205-208 | |
ANNEX | ||
Case study "Folding Attic Stairway" | ||
| Ulrich JOOS Dieter STAUDER | 209-210 | |
| 1. Presentation of the case study | 211-220 | |
| 2. UK Patent Application GB 2319 051 A | 221-236 | |
| 3. German translation of UK Patent Application GB 2319 051 A | 237-246 | |
| 4. French translation of UK Patent Application GB 2319 051 A | 247-256 | |
| 5. Folding Attic Stairs v. The Loft Stairs Company Ltd., High Court of Justice – Patents court – [2009] EWHC 1221 (Pat) | 257-308 |