T 2124/21 du 25.01.2024
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2024:T212421.20240125
- Date de la décision
- 25 janvier 2024
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 2124/21
- En ligne le
- 12 mars 2024
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 08745942.6
- Classe de la CIB
- G01F 1/84
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Non distribuées (D)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- Résumé de Art 13(2) RPBA 2020
- Titre de la demande
- DUAL-DRIVER VIBRATORY FLOWMETER
- Nom du demandeur
- Micro Motion, Inc.
- Nom de l'opposant
- -
- Chambre
- 3.4.02
- Sommaire
- -
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(2)
- Mots-clés
- Amendment to the appeal case within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA - (yes)
Exceptional circumstances justified by cogent reasons - (no)
Amendment taken into account - (no) - Exergue
- On appeal, the sole request subject of the appealed decision was abandoned, and amended requests were filed instead. When later the sole request was submitted in reply to the board's communication, it constituted an "amendment" to the appeal case within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA.
The appellant's choice, on appeal, not to seek a review of the appealed decision prevented the board from pursuing the primary object of the appeal proceedings (cf. Article 12(1)(a) and (b) and (2) RPBA). Instead, the late submission of the sole request left its consideration to the board's discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA. - Affaires citées
- -
- Affaires citantes
- -
Order
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.