T 0867/23 (Cariprazine for treating primary negative symptoms of schizophrenia / RICHTER GEDEON NYRT.) du 21.01.2025

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence: ECLI:EP:BA:2025:T086723.20250121
Date de la décision: 21 janvier 2025
Numéro de l'affaire: T 0867/23
Requête en révision de: -
Numéro de la demande: 13805597.5
Classe de la CIB: A61P 25/18 A61K 31/495
Langue de la procédure: Anglais
Distribution: Non distribuées (D)
Téléchargement: Décision en anglais
Versions JO: Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire: -
Résumés pour cette décision: Résumé de First, because "consulting the description" did not imply any specific result of such consultation: A consultation of two conflicting authorities did not a priori determine who is master. Decision G 1/24 did not require the boards to give the description preference over the wording of the claim. To the contrary, according to the Order of G 1/24, "the claims are the starting point and the basis for assessing the patentability of an invention", and as the present board added, in line with UPC_CoA_335/2023, second headnote, the claims are the "decisive basis". Second, such interpretation would contradict the well
Titre de la demande: TRANS-4-{2-[4-(2,3-DICHLOROPHENYL)-PIPERAZIN-1-YL]-ETHYL}-N,N-DIMETHYLCARBAMOYL-CYCLOHEXYLAMINE FOR TREATING PRIMARY NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
Nom du demandeur: Richter Gedeon Nyrt.
Nom de l'opposant: Wittkopp, Alexander
Krka, d.d., Novo mesto
Chambre: 3.3.07
Sommaire: -
Dispositions juridiques pertinentes: European Patent Convention Art 100(a)European Patent Convention Art 100(b)European Patent Convention Art 100(c)European Patent Convention Art 54(2)European Patent Convention Art 56
Mots-clés: Sufficiency of disclosure - proof of the claimed therapeutic effect
Sufficiency of disclosure - post-published evidence
Sufficiency of disclosure - (yes)
Novelty - (yes)
Inventive step - reasonable expectation of success (no)
Amendments - added subject-matter (no)
Exergue: -
Affaires citées: G 0002/08 G 0002/21 T 0254/93 T 0609/02 T 0779/18 T 0979/23
Affaires citantes: -

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeals are dismissed.