T 0087/08 vom 11.02.2010
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T008708.20100211
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 11. Februar 2010
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0087/08
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 01900995.0
- IPC-Klasse
- A61K 7/48
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden und -mitglieder verteilt (B)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Shadow-effect cosmetic composition
- Name des Antragstellers
- Color Access, Inc.
- Name des Einsprechenden
- L'OREAL
- Kammer
- 3.3.10
- Leitsatz
Article 56 EPC requires that the assessment of inventive step is made "having regard to the state of the art". Accordingly, a decision is not sufficiently reasoned in the sense of Rule 68(2) EPC 1973 (Rule 111(2) EPC 2000) if the chain of reasoning to justify the finding of lack of inventive step merely states that a purported effect has not been achieved, i.e. this technical problem had not been solved, without reformulating the problem in a less ambitious way and without assessing obviousness of the claimed solution to that reformulated problem in the light of the cited prior art.
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention R 67 1973European Patent Convention R 68(2) 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Novelty (yes) : selection within 2 lists
Inventive step : fresh case, new closest prior art document
Procedural violation (yes) : decision not reasoned
Remittal (yes) : reimbursement of appeal fees (yes) - Orientierungssatz
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the first instance for further prosecution upon the basis of claims 1 to 23 of the main request filed with a letter dated 12 March 2008.
3. The appeal fees of both parties are reimbursed.