European Patent Office

T 0087/08 vom 11.02.2010

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T008708.20100211
Datum der Entscheidung
11. Februar 2010
Aktenzeichen
T 0087/08
Antrag auf Überprüfung von
-
Anmeldenummer
01900995.0
IPC-Klasse
A61K 7/48
Verfahrenssprache
Englisch
Verteilung
An die Kammervorsitzenden und -mitglieder verteilt (B)
Amtsblattfassungen
Keine AB-Links gefunden
Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
-
Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
-
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
Shadow-effect cosmetic composition
Name des Antragstellers
Color Access, Inc.
Name des Einsprechenden
L'OREAL
Kammer
3.3.10
Leitsatz

Article 56 EPC requires that the assessment of inventive step is made "having regard to the state of the art". Accordingly, a decision is not sufficiently reasoned in the sense of Rule 68(2) EPC 1973 (Rule 111(2) EPC 2000) if the chain of reasoning to justify the finding of lack of inventive step merely states that a purported effect has not been achieved, i.e. this technical problem had not been solved, without reformulating the problem in a less ambitious way and without assessing obviousness of the claimed solution to that reformulated problem in the light of the cited prior art.

Schlagwörter
Novelty (yes) : selection within 2 lists
Inventive step : fresh case, new closest prior art document
Procedural violation (yes) : decision not reasoned
Remittal (yes) : reimbursement of appeal fees (yes)
Orientierungssatz
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the first instance for further prosecution upon the basis of claims 1 to 23 of the main request filed with a letter dated 12 March 2008.

3. The appeal fees of both parties are reimbursed.