T 1764/08 vom 02.12.2010
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T176408.20101202
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 2. Dezember 2010
- Aktenzeichen
- T 1764/08
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 99960701.3
- IPC-Klasse
- H04N 7/26
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden verteilt (C)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Motion vector processing
- Name des Antragstellers
- Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Name des Einsprechenden
- -
- Kammer
- 3.5.04
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- Act revising the Convention on the Grant of European Patents Art 7(1)Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Art 41(2)Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Art 64(2)Decision President of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the filing of patent applications and other documents by facsimileDecision_AC of 28 June 2001 on the transitional provisions under_Art_7of the Act revising the EPC_Art_001Decision_President_of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the electronic filing of patent applications and other documents_Art_002(1)Decision_President_of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the electronic filing of patent applications and other documents_Art_002(3)Decision_President_of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the electronic filing of patent applications and other documents_Art_012Decision_President_of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the electronic filing of patent applications and other documents_Art_013European Patent Convention Art 106European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 122(1)European Patent Convention Art 122(2)European Patent Convention R 101(1)European Patent Convention R 126(2)European Patent Convention R 131(4)European Patent Convention R 136(1)European Patent Convention R 2(1)European Patent Convention R 99Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13
- Schlagwörter
- Admissibility of appeal - grounds of appeal filed via epoline (no)
Principle of good faith (no)
EPO document submission system unnecessarily complicated (no)
Re-establishment of rights (no)
All due care (no) - Orientierungssatz
- See Sections 9 to 10 and 16 to 21
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The request for re-establishment of rights is rejected.
2. The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.