T 1969/08 (Touch screen with layered structure/TAIGUEN) vom 07.06.2011
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T196908.20110607
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 7. Juni 2011
- Aktenzeichen
- T 1969/08
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 02771991.3
- IPC-Klasse
- G06F 3/033
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- An die Kammervorsitzenden verteilt (C)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Keine AB-Links gefunden
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- A touch control display screen with a built-in electromagnet induction layer of septum array grids
- Name des Antragstellers
- Taiguen Technology (Shen_zhen) Co., Ltd., et al
- Name des Einsprechenden
- -
- Kammer
- 3.5.05
- Leitsatz
- -
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 106European Patent Convention Art 107European Patent Convention Art 108European Patent Convention Art 111(1)European Patent Convention Art 113(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 84European Patent Convention Art 97(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art (4)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(3)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(6)
- Schlagwörter
- Sole request filed after summons for oral proceedings returns to subjet-matter abandoned during first-instance proceedings
Non-attendance at oral proceedings
Diverging request prima facie clearly allowable (no)
Sole request admissible (no) - Orientierungssatz
- If a feature objected to as "obscure" by the examining division and omitted from all requests subsequently filed by the applicant is then re-introduced in the claims filed one month before oral proceedings during the appeal proceedings without commenting on the objection raised earlier against this feature, the board may refuse to admit these claims into the proceedings at its discretion under Article 12(4) RPBA.
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.