European Patent Office

T 0998/23 vom 21.10.2024

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
ECLI:EP:BA:2024:T099823.20241021
Datum der Entscheidung
21. Oktober 2024
Aktenzeichen
T 0998/23
Antrag auf Überprüfung von
-
Anmeldenummer
10834964.8
Verfahrenssprache
Englisch
Verteilung
Nicht verteilt (D)
Amtsblattfassungen
Keine AB-Links gefunden
Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
-
Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
-
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
METHOD OF MAKING A COATED ABRASIVE ARTICLE HAVING SHAPED ABRASIVE PARTICLES AND RESULTING PRODUCT
Name des Antragstellers
3M Innovative Properties Company
Name des Einsprechenden
Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.
Kammer
3.2.07
Leitsatz
-
Relevante Rechtsnormen
European Patent Convention Art 100(a)European Patent Convention Art 100(b)European Patent Convention Art 100(c)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 54European Patent Convention Art 56European Patent Convention Art 83European Patent Convention R 124(1)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(6)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 013(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 015(1)
Schlagwörter
Late-filed objection - admitted in first-instance proceedings (no)
Late-filed objection - error in use of discretion at first instance (no)
Late-filed objection - admitted (no)
Grounds for opposition - insufficiency of disclosure (no)
Grounds for opposition - lack of patentability (no)
Sufficiency of disclosure - (yes)
Novelty - (yes)
Inventive step - (yes)
Minutes of oral proceedings - essentials of oral proceedings
Minutes of oral proceedings - request to record statement in the minutes (refused)
Amendment after notification of Art. 15(1) RPBA communication (yes)
Amendment after notification of Art. 15(1) RPBA communication - cogent reasons (no)
Amendment after notification of Art. 15(1) RPBA communication - exceptional circumstances (no)
Amendment after notification of Art. 15(1) RPBA communication - taken into account (no)
Orientierungssatz
-
Zitierende Akten
-

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is maintained as granted.