T 0595/90 (Grain oriented silicon sheet) vom 24.05.1993
- Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
- ECLI:EP:BA:1993:T059590.19930524
- Datum der Entscheidung
- 24. Mai 1993
- Aktenzeichen
- T 0595/90
- Antrag auf Überprüfung von
- -
- Anmeldenummer
- 81303891.6
- Verfahrenssprache
- Englisch
- Verteilung
- Im Amtsblatt des EPA veröffentlicht (A)
- Download
- Entscheidung auf Englisch
- Amtsblattfassungen
- Weitere Entscheidungen für diese Akte
- -
- Zusammenfassungen für diese Entscheidung
- -
- Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
- Grain-oriented silicon steel sheets having a very low iron loss and methods for producing the same
- Name des Antragstellers
- Kawasaki Steel
- Name des Einsprechenden
- Nippon Steel
Thyssen Stahl
Ugine Aciers - Kammer
- 3.2.02
- Leitsatz
1. Observations submitted as filed after the "adjournment" of the oral proceedings, which means the closing of the debate (in French "prononcer la clôture des débats" and in German "die sachliche Debatte für beendet erklären") are disregarded by the Board unless it reopens the debate. The reopening depends on the Board's discretion (point 1 of the Reasons).
2. A product which can be envisaged as such with all the characteristics determining its identity including its properties in use, i.e. an otherwise obvious entity, may become non-obvious and claimable as such, if there is no known way or applicable (analogy) method in the art to make it and the claimed methods for its preparation are the first to achieve this and do so in an inventive manner (point 5 of the reasons).
- Relevante Rechtsnormen
- European Patent Convention Art 113(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 114(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 116(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973
- Schlagwörter
- Method claim
Inventive step (no)
Product made by method also not inventive
Basis of decision
Right to be heard
Oral proceedings - Orientierungssatz
- -
- Zitierte Akten
- -
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The patent is revoked.