T 0689/05 (-Vienna Convention on the Law of TreatiesArt. 25, 28European Convention on Human RightsArt. 7Act revising the Convention on the Grant of European PatentsArt. 4(1)(2), 6, 7Transitional Provisions:Decision of the Administrative Council of 28 June 2001 on the transitional provisions under Article 7 of the Act revising the EPCDecision of the Administrative Council of 7 December 2006 amending the Implementing Regulations to the European Patent Convention 2000) of 07.09.2010
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T068905.20100907
- Date of decision
- 7 September 2010
- Case number
- T 0689/05
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 96938526.9
- IPC class
- G11B 27/00
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Distributed to board chairmen (C)
- Download
- Decision in English
- OJ versions
- No OJ links found
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Multi-language recording medium and reproducing device for the same
- Applicant name
- KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.5.04
- Headnote
- -
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 10(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 10(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 104European Patent Convention Art 113(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 116(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 116(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 16European Patent Convention Art 17European Patent Convention Art 172(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 172(3) 1973European Patent Convention Art 18European Patent Convention Art 54(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 54(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973European Patent Convention Art 83 1973European Patent Convention Art 87(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 9(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 9(4) 1973European Patent Convention R 67 1973European Patent Convention R 68(2) 1973European Patent Convention R 71(1) 1973Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 11
- Keywords
- Remittal to first instance - no - partial lack of reasoning does not amount to a fundamental deficiency and summons to oral proceedings in The Hague does not violate Article 113(1)EPC
Inventive step (main and first auxiliary request - no)
Sufficiency of disclosure (second auxiliary request - yes - claimed recording medium not a DVD as defined in the DVD standard)
Priority (not valid for the second auxiliary request)
Novelty (second auxiliary request - no)
Request for reimbursement of appeal fee (refused)
Request for reimbursement of travel cost for the representative to oral proceedings held in the Hague (refused) - no competence of the board to decide on such a request - Catchword
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is refused.
3. The request for payment of the travel costs is refused.