European Patent Office

T 2194/22 of 19.12.2024

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2024:T219422.20241219
Date of decision
19 December 2024
Case number
T 2194/22
Petition for review of
-
Application number
12155832.4
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Distributed to board chairmen (C)
OJ versions
No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
Abstract on Article 111 EPC
Application title
Vertical heat exchanger configuration for lng facility
Applicant name
ConocoPhillips Company
Opponent name
Linde GmbH
Board
3.2.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 111(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 56Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(2)Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 2020 Art 012(4)
Keywords
Inventive step - ex post facto analysis
Inventive step - non-obvious combination of known features
Inventive step - main request (yes)
Appeal decision - binding effect of appeal decision
Amendment to case - objection
Amendment to case - suitability of amendment to address issues (no)
Late-filed objection - admitted (no)
Catchword
1. The admittance of a substantively identical request in post-remittal proceedings is not excluded pursuant to Article 111(2) EPC if the facts underlying the Board's earlier decision for not admitting that request are not the same because a new objection was introduced in post-remittal proceedings (see 2.4).
2. When exercising the discretion to admit a party's request in post-remittal proceedings, the opposition division must take into account the framework defined in the appeal proceedings (see 2.5.1), as the prosecution of a case after remittal should in principle build upon the situation that existed at the end of the appeal proceedings that led to the remittal (see 2.5.2).
Citing cases
R 0003/25T 1285/23

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is refused.