T 0123/85 (Incrustation inhibitors) of 23.02.1988
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1988:T012385.19880223
- Date of decision
- 23 February 1988
- Case number
- T 0123/85
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 80105230.9
- IPC class
- -
- Language of proceedings
- German
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- -
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- BASF
- Opponent name
- Procter & Gamble
Unilever
Röhm - Board
- 3.3.02
- Headnote
I. The patent proprietor may not surrender his patent either wholly or in part during opposition proceedings (reference to T 73/84 - 3.2.1 OJ EPO 1985, 241; T 186/84 - 3.3.1 OJ EPO 1986, 79). During the opposition proceedings the patent proprietor is entitled to amend a request already made; in particular he may reinstate the patent in the form in which it was granted, provided this does not constitute an abuse of procedural law (cf. point 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 of the Reasons).
2. If the patent proprietor complies with a proposal from the Opposition Division to include a feature in the claim and if the patent is revoked because inclusion of that feature constitutes an inadmissible extension the patent proprietor may delete said feature in the appeal proceedings (cf. point 3.1.3 of the Reasons).
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 102(3)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 111(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 113(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 123(3) 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973
- Keywords
- Opposition proceedings
Surrender of patent or parts of patent (claim features)
Abuse of procedural law
Remittal (yes) - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
- Citing cases
- G 0009/92G 0004/93T 0155/88T 0225/88T 0331/89T 0217/90T 0252/90T 0823/90T 0506/91T 0715/92T 0687/93T 0752/93T 0828/93T 0900/94T 0080/95T 0185/96T 1037/96T 0065/97T 0445/97T 0368/98T 0564/98T 0172/99T 0473/99T 0717/99T 0048/00T 0697/00T 0825/00T 0943/00T 1143/00T 0386/01T 0880/01T 0794/02T 0934/02T 0178/03T 0386/04T 1213/05T 1276/05T 1282/05T 1394/05T 1091/06T 1067/08T 0105/09T 1188/09T 0028/10T 1150/11T 0036/12T 2385/12T 1135/15T 0043/16T 2827/19
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The contested decision is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the Opposition Division for continuation of the proceedings with the main request submitted in the oral proceedings.