T 0663/02 du 17.03.2011
- Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence
- ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T066302.20110317
- Date de la décision
- 17 mars 2011
- Numéro de l'affaire
- T 0663/02
- Requête en révision de
- -
- Numéro de la demande
- 96944505.5
- Classe de la CIB
- G01R 33/563
- Langue de la procédure
- Anglais
- Distribution
- Distribuées aux présidents et aux membres des chambres de recours (B)
- Téléchargement
- Décision en anglais
- Versions JO
- Aucun lien JO trouvé
- Autres décisions pour cet affaire
- -
- Résumés pour cette décision
- -
- Titre de la demande
- Method for magnetic resonance imaging of arteries using a magnetic resonance contrast agent
- Nom du demandeur
- Prince, Martin, R.
- Nom de l'opposant
- Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Chambre
- 3.4.01
- Sommaire
I. The fact that an intravenous injection of a magnetic resonance contrast agent can be delegated by a physician to a qualified paramedical professional indicates that such an injection may be considered as representing a minor routine intervention which does not imply a substantial health risk when carried out with the required care and skill. Such acts would be ruled out from the scope of the application of the exclusion clause pursuant to Article 53(c) EPC following the narrow understanding advocated by the EBA (G 0001/04 and 0001/07) (Reasons, 3.2.4).
II. A possible way of assessing health risks is to use a risk matrix permitting to combine the levels of likelihood and health impact of a complication of a medical act with regard to a large number of patients, so as to obtain statistical health risk scores which may be used to decide what action should be taken. Such a risk assessment supports the view that an intravenous injection of a magnetic resonance contrast agent represents a minor routine intervention involving no substantial health risks when carried out with the required care and skill (Reasons, 3.2.5).
- Dispositions juridiques pertinentes
- European Patent Convention Art 53(c)
- Mots-clés
- -
- Exergue
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The decision under appeal is set aside.
2. The patent is maintained as granted.