T 0666/05 (Mutation/UNIVERSITY OF UTAH) du 13.11.2008

Identifiant européen de la jurisprudence: ECLI:EP:BA:2008:T066605.20081113
Date de la décision: 13 novembre 2008
Numéro de l'affaire: T 0666/05
Requête en révision de: -
Numéro de la demande: 95305605.8
Classe de la CIB: C07K 14/82
Langue de la procédure: Anglais
Distribution: Distribuées aux présidents des chambres de recours (C)
Téléchargement: Décision en anglais
Versions JO: Aucun lien JO trouvé
Autres décisions pour cet affaire: -
Résumés pour cette décision: -
Titre de la demande: Mutations in the 17q-linked breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene
Nom du demandeur: The University of Utah Research Foundation
Nom de l'opposant: Institut Curie
Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
Institut Gustave Roussy-IGR
Vereniging van Stichtingen Klinische Genetica, et al.
De Staat der Nederlanden
Greenpeace e.V.
Chambre: 3.3.04
Sommaire: -
Dispositions juridiques pertinentes: European Patent Convention Art 123(2)European Patent Convention Art 123(3)European Patent Convention Art 52(2)European Patent Convention Art 53(a)European Patent Convention Art 53(c)European Patent Convention Art 54 1973 European Patent Convention Art 56 1973 European Patent Convention Art 57 1973 European Patent Convention Art 83 1973 European Patent Convention Art 84 1973 European Patent Convention Art 87 1973 European Patent Convention Art 88 European Patent Convention Art 89 1973
Mots-clés: Main request - Clarity and support by the description (yes)
Main request - Added subject-matter (no)
Main request - Extension of scope of protection (no)
Main request - Priority (yes)
Main request - Novelty (yes)
Main request - Inventive step (yes)
Main request - Sufficiency of disclosure (yes)
Main request - Patentable invention (yes)
Main request - Exception to patentability (no)
Main request - Industrial applicability (yes)
Exergue: -
Affaires citées: G 0002/98 G 0001/04 T 0201/83 T 0923/92 T 0296/93 T 0272/95 T 0223/96 T 0925/98 T 0190/99 T 1241/03 T 1213/05
Affaires citantes: G 0003/19 T 0156/08

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the department of first instance with the order to maintain the patent in the following version:

Description: Pages 3, 3a, 4 to 24 and 138 submitted

at the oral proceedings on 13 November

2008; pages 25 to 137 of the patent

specification as granted.

Claims: 1 to 9 of the main request, filed with a

letter dated 2 June 2008.

Figures: 1 to 10 on pages 151 to 169 of the

patent specification as granted.